Kto płaci ten ma prawo wymagać, według starego polskiego przysłowia. Obecnie przysłowie to stosuje się do sposobu rządzenia Stanami Zjednoczonymi. Typowym przykładem jest nie-etycne potępienie w Waszyngtonie raportu sędziego Richard’a Goldstone’a, przez członków obydwu izb kongresu. Raport ten był przygotowany dla Rady Obrony Praw Człowieka przy ONZ i był sporządzony na podstawie śledztwa, dotyczącego gwałcenie międzynarodowych praw człowieka oraz powiązanych z tymi prawami, międzynarodowe prawa humanitarne w czasie ostatniej wojny na terenie Gazy, między przeważającymi siłami Izraela i powstańcami z palestyńskiego Hamas’u.

Raport przygotował powszechnie respektowany i szanowany, były sędzia sądu konstytucyjnego Afryki Południowej, Richard J. Goldstone, obiektywny i sprawiedliwy człowiek żydowskiego pochodzenia, ale nie stronniczy na rzecz Likudu, partii rządzącej w Izraelu. Richard Goldstone był od 1994 do 1996 roku sędzią Trybunału Kryminalnego ONZ’tu w sprawach dotyczących Jugosławii i Rwandy.

W czasie krwawej pacyfikacji, na terenie Gazy, zostało zabitych ponad 1400 Palestyńczyków, głównie osób cywilnych i około 10 Żydów – kilku w siłach zbrojnych Izraela i kilku cywilów porażonych ogniem rakiet Hamasu. Proporcja, a raczej dysproporcja strat, sama mówi za siebie.

Raport sędziego Goldstone’a nie pomija zbrodni wojowników Hamas’s na Żydach, ale podaje szczegółowo nie proporcjonalnie liczne zbrodnie dokonane na Palestyńczykach przez wojsko Izraela. Sędzia Goldstone jest za to potępiany przez „Likdników” rządzących w Izraelu i przez lobby Izraela w Waszyngtonie, jak również przez sekretarza stanu, panią Hilary Clinton (która od dawna popiera oszustów z żydowskiego ruchu roszczeniowego przeciwko Polsce).

Pani Hilary Clinton była senatorem wybranym w stanie Nowy Jork, w stanie politycznie i ekonomicznie zdominowanym przez Żydów. W prezydenckich przed-wyborach starała się ona zdobyć pozycję kandydata na prezydenta USA, z ramienia partii demokratycznej. Kampanię wyborczą pani Clinton przegrała na rzecz senatora Barack’a Obamy, który jako prezydent zamianował panią Clinton na stanowisko sekretarza stanu.

Ostatnio rząd USA poczynił nowe ustępstwa na rzecz Likudników, w formie prób zatwierdzenia na arenie międzynarodowej, nielegalnych osiedli żydowskich na ziemiach Arabów palestyńskich, niby jako warunek do pertraktacji w sprawie traktatu pokojowego między Izraelem i przyszłym niepodległym państwem Palestyńczyków. Warunek ten jest odrzucony przez Arabów, którzy uznają granicę Izraela i Palestyny według stanu z 1967 roku i nie chcą zalegalizować dotąd nielegalnych osiedli żydowskich.

W dniu 26 października, 2009, członkowie komitetów do spraw zagranicznych USA w senacie i w izbie deputowanych w Waszyngtonie potępili raport sędziego Goldstone’a w sprawie zbrodni popełnionych na terenie Gazy w czasie krwawej pacyfikacji przez siły zbrojne Izraela. Kongresmani bezwstydnie nawoływali rząd prezydenta Obamy, żeby zdyskwalifikował raport sędziego Goldston’a i nie dopuścił do dalszego rozpowszechniania tego raportu w ONZ.

Raport sędziego Goldstone’a naturalnie jest bardzo niewygodny dla Likudników izraelskich i żaden z członków kongresu w Waszyngtonie, jak dotąd nie wystąpił w sprawie wyjaśnienia szczegółów zbrodni dokonanych w czasie ostatniej pacyfikacji terenu Gazy przez Izrael. Sprawa ta jest politycznie niewygodna dla senatorów i posłów, którzy w kampaniach wyborczych muszą zabiegać o wielo-milionowe sumy od darczyńców, wśród których do najważniejszych należą banki żydowskie takie jak Goldman Sachs.

Głównym darczyńcą kampanii wyborczej prezydenta Obamy był właśnie bank Goldman Sachs. Darczyńcy płacą na koszty kampanii wyborczych i w zamian mają prawo stawiać nawet takie wymagania jak nieetyczne potępienie i odrzucenie obiektywnego raportu sędziego Goldstone’a, żeby kultywować bogatych darczyńców i bezwstydnie pokazywać światu, że USA „nierządem stoi,” tak jak Pierwsza Rzeczpospolita przed zaborami.

Born Sept. 3, 1921
Lwów, Poland

in Dec 1939 left Warsaw. Dec 30, 1939 arrested by Ukrainians serving the Gestapo in Dukla, then transferred to Barwinek, Krosno, Jaslo, Tarnów, Oswiecim, arrived in Oranienburg-Sachsenhausen on Aug. 10, 1940.

April 19, 1945 started on the Death March of Brandenburg from Sachsenhausen; escaped gunfire of SS-guards and arrived to Schwerin and freedom on May 2, 1945.

September 1945 arrived in Brussels, Belgium; obtained admission as a regular student at the Catholic University: Institute Superieur de Commerce, St. Ignace in Antwerp.

in 1954 graduated in Civil Engineering at the top of his class. Was invited to join honorary societies: Tau Beta Pi (general engineering honorary society), Phi Kappa Phi (academic honorary society equivalent to Phi Beta Kappa), Pi Mu (mechanical engineering honorary society), and Chi Epsilon (civil engineering honorary society). Taught descriptive geometry at the University of Tennessee;

in 1955 graduated with M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering.

in 1955 started working for Shell Oil Company in New Orleans. After one year of managerial training was assigned to design of marine structures for drilling and production of petroleum.

in 1960 started working for Texaco Research and Development in Houston, Texas as a Project Engineer. Authored total of 50 American and foreign patents on marine structures for the petroleum industry;
wrote an article: The Rise and Fall of the Polish Commonwealth – A Quest for a Representative Government in Central and Eastern Europe in the 14th to 18th Centuries. Started to work on a Tabular History of Poland.

in 1972 moved to Blacksburg, Virginia. During the following years worked as Consulting Engineer for Texaco, also taught in Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University as Adjunct Professor in the College of Civil Engineering teaching courses on marine structures of the petroleum industry. Designed and supervised the construction of a hill top home for his family, also bought 500 acre ranch (near Thomas Jefferson National Forest) where he restored 200 years old mill house on a mountain stream.

in 1978 prepared Polish-English, English-Polish Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. The dictionary included a Tabular History of Poland, Polish Language, People, and Culture as well as Pogonowski’s phonetic symbols for phonetic transcriptions in English and Polish at each dictionary entry; the phonetic explanations were illustrated with cross-sections of speech (organs used to pronounce the sounds unfamiliar to the users). It was the first dictionary with phonetic transcription at each Polish entry for use by English speakers

in 1981 prepared Practical Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1983 prepared Concise Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. Wrote an analysis of Michael Ch ci ski’s Poland, Communism, Nationalism, Anti-Semitism. Also selected crucial quotations from Norman Davies’ God’s Playground – A History of Poland on the subject of the Polish indigenous democratic process.

in 1985 prepared Polish-English Standard Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. Also prepared a revised and expanded edition of the Concise Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics, also published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1987 prepared Poland: A Historical Atlas on Polish History and Prehistory including 200 maps and graphs as well as Chronology of Poland’s Constitutional and Political Development, and the Evolution of Polish Identity – The Milestones. An introductory chapter was entitled Poland the Middle Ground. Aloysius A. Mazewski President of Polish-American Congress wrote an introduction. The Atlas was published by Hippocrene Books Inc. and later by Dorset Press of the Barnes and Noble Co. Inc. which sends some 30 million catalogues to American homes including color reproduction of book covers. Thus, many Americans were exposed to the cover of Pogonowski’s Atlas showing the range of borders of Poland during the history – many found out for the firsttime that Poland was an important power in the past. Total of about 30,000 atlases were printed so far.

In 1988 the publication of Poland: A Historical Atlas resulted in a number of invitations extended by several Polonian organizations to Iwo Pogonowski to present Television Programs on Polish History. Pogonowski responded and produced over two year period 220 half-hour video programs in his studio at home (and at his own expense.) These programs formed a serial entitled: Poland, A History of One Thousand Years. Total of over 1000 broadcasts of these programs were transmitted by cable television in Chicago, Detroit-Hamtramck, Cleveland, and Blacksburg.

in 1990-1991 translated from the Russian the Catechism of a Revolutionary of 1869 in which crime has been treated as a normal part of the revolutionary program. Started preparation of the Killing the Best and the Brightest: A Chronology of the USSR-German Attempt to Behead the Polish Nation showing how the USSR became a prototype of modern totalitarian state, how this prototype was adapted in Germany by the Nazis.

in 1991 prepared Polish Phrasebook, Polish Conversations for Americans including picture code for gender and familiarity, published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1991 prepared English Conversations for Poles with Concise Dictionary published by Hippocrene Books Inc. By then a total of over 100,000 Polish-English, English-Polish Dictionaries written by Pogonowski were sold in the United States and abroad.

in 1992 prepared a Dictionary of Polish, Latin, Hebrew, and Yiddish Terms used in Contacts between Poles and Jews. It was prepared for the history of Jews in Poland as well as 115 maps and graphs and 172 illustrations, paintings, drawings, and documents, etc. of Jewish life in Poland. This material was accompanied by proper annotations.

in 1993 prepared Jews in Poland, Rise of the Jews as a Nation from Congressus Judaicus in Poland to the Knesset in Israel, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. in 3000 copies. Foreword was written by Richard Pipes, professor of history at Harvard University, and Pogonowski’s school mate in the Keczmar school in Warsaw. Part I included: a Synopsis of 1000 Year History of Jews in Poland; the 1264 Statute of Jewish Liberties in Poland in Latin and English translation; Jewish Autonomy in Poland 1264-1795; German Annihilation of the Jews. In appendixes are documents and illustrations. An Atlas is in the Part III. It is divided as follows: Early Jewish Settlements 966-1264; The Crucial 500 Years, 1264-1795; Competition (between Poles and Jews) Under Foreign Rule, 1795-1918; The Last Blossoming of Jewish Culture in Poland, 1918-1939; German Genocide of the Jews, 1940-1944; Jewish Escape from Europe 1945-1947 – The End of European (Polish) Phase of Jewish History (when most of world’s Jewry lived in Europe). Pogonowski began to write a new book starting with the Chronology of the Martyrdom of Polish Intelligentsia during World War II and the Stalinist Terror; the book in preparation was entitled Killing the Best and the Brightest.

in 1995 prepared Dictionary of Polish Business, Legal and Associated Terms for use with the new edition of the Practical Polish-English, English-Polish Dictionary and later to be published as a separate book.

in 1996 Pogonowski’s Poland: A Historical Atlas; was translated into Polish; some 130 of the original 200 maps printed in color; the Chronology of Poland was also translated into Polish. The Atlas was published by Wydawnictwo Suszczy ski I Baran in Kraków in 3000 copies; additional publications are expected. Prepared Polish-English, Eglish-Polish Compact Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1997 finished preparation of the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics including over 200,000 entries, in three volumes on total of 4000 pages; it is published by Hippocrene Books Inc; the Polish title is: Uniwesalny S ownik Polsko-Angielski. Besides years of work Pogonowski spent over $50,000 on computers, computer services, typing, and proof reading in order to make the 4000 page dictionary camera ready; assisted in the preparation of second edition of Jews in Poland, Rise of the Jews from Congressus Judaicus in Poland to the Knesset in Israel published in fall of 1997. Prepared computer programs for English-Polish Dictionary to serve as a companion to the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary printed by the end of May 1997.

in 1998 Pogonowski organized preparation of CD ROM for the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary, Practical English-Polish Dictionary, Polish Phrasebook for Tourists and Travelers to Poland, all published earlier by Iwo C. Pogonowski. The Phrasebook includes 280 minutes of bilingual audio read by actors. Started preparation for a new edition of Poland: A Historical Atlas. New Appendices are being prepared on such subjects as: Polish contribution to Allied’s wartime intelligence: the breaking of the Enigma Codes, Pune Munde rocket production; Poland’s contribution to the international law since 1415; Poland’s early development of rocket technology such as Polish Rocketry Handbook published in 1650 in which Poles introduced for the first time into the world’s literature concepts of multiple warheads, multistage rockets, new controls in rocket flight, etc. Poland’s Chronology is being enlarged to reflect the mechanisms of subjugation of Polish people by the Soviet terror apparatus. Continued preparation of the Killing the Best and the Brightest: A Chronology of the USSR-German Attempt to Behead the Polish Nation, including the 1992 revelations from Soviet archives as well as the current research in Poland. Continued preparation of two-volume English Polish Dictionary, a companion to the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary published in 1997. Reviewed Upiorna Dekada by J. T. Gross.

in 1999 Pogonowski continued writing Poland – An Illustrated History and preparing for it 21 maps and diagrams and 89 illustrations.

in 2000 Pogonowski prepared, in a camera ready form, Poland – An Illustrated History; it was published by Hippocrene Books Inc. NY 2000 and recommended by Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor under President Carter, as “An important contribution to the better understanding of Polish history, which demonstrates in a vivid fashion the historical vicissitudes of that major European nation.”

After WWI and the foundation of the Republic of Poland, the new nation was in great danger to its very existence as it was weaker than the growing power of Germany and Russia. The essence of the predicament of Poland and a threat to its independence and even to its existence, prior to the Second World War was summarized in the testament of Marshal Józef Piłsudski. He told the Poles: “veer as long as possible between Germany and Russia; if this becomes impossible, bring in to the conflict the rest of the world.” On the 70th anniversary of the beginning of WWII in 1939, it important to remember that during that year Poland saved Stalin’s Russia from dismal defeat, by refusing on January 26, 1939, to join anti-soviet alliance the Anti-Komintern Pact and take part in a two-front attack on the Soviet Union by Germany and Japan.
Polish ambassador Jozef Lipski documented in his book “Diplomat in Berlin 1933-39″ Hitler’s declarations since Aug. 5, 1935, that good Polish-German relations were of primary importance to him. He proposed an alliance against Russia, military cooperation, an air pact, etc. However, the government of Poland knew that the essence of the policies of the Nazi government, at all times, was the implementation of the doctrine of Lebensraum, which meant eventual annexation by Germany of Poland and other Slavonic countries between the Baltic and the Black Sea.
Poland announced its refusal to join the anti-Comnitern Pact at the worse possible time for Germany. In Warsaw, on January 26, 1939, the government of Poland told Joahim von Ribbentrop, the German foreign minister, that Poland will not join. This happened after the Japanese took two Soviet islands on the River Amur in 1937 and attacked the Red Russian Independent Eastern Army on the border of Manchuko in 1938 and then, at the beginning of 1939, started moving against Outer Mongolia.
The refusal by the Poles to join the pact, shattered Hitler’s strategic plans and eventually led the Berlin government to gamble with a rapprochement with Moscow, which antagonized Japan. German predicament was evident when Poland, France and Great Britain exchanged common defense guarantees in March 1939 and Germany faced an eventual two front war if it attacked Poland. It is said that Admiral Canaris upon learning about Poland’s rejection of the anti-Comintern Pact told Reinhard Heydrich that Germany did not have enough soldiers to win the coming war. The resulting complications in German-Japanese relations were soon apparent.
It should also be remembered that on March 19, 1939 Stalin delivered a speech to the 18th convention of the Soviet Communist Party – speech broadcast on Moscow radio. Stalin accused Great Britain and France of trying to foment German and Japanese attacks on the Soviet Union in order to dictate their conditions to the exhausted belligerents. Stalin then suggested a possibility of cooperation between National Socialist Germany and the Soviet Union. This offer came as a complete surprise to Berlin. It provided the Germans with the possibility of buying time by pretending to accept a permanent rapprochement with the Soviets.

Buying time was important for Germany because Poland defended her sovereignty and refused to join Germany against the Soviet Union. By doing so Poland deprived the Berlin government of the 40 to 50 well trained Polish divisions. Polish forces could have made up the deficiency in German manpower and together with 100 German divisions, would have been used in a decisive attack on Russia. The Soviet Union was the main target of the planned conquest of Slavic lands “for the next 1000 years.” When Poland refused to submit to either the German Nazis or the Soviets, the Berlin government started to gamble with a fake rapprochement with Moscow. (Pogonowski, Iwo, “Jews in Poland: A documentary History, New Jork, 1993, p. 95; ISBN 0-7818-0116-8).
Ominously, Hitler said to Jacob Burkhardt, Commissioner of the League of Nations on August 11, 1939, that: “Everything I undertake is directed against Russia; if the West is too stupid and blind to grasp this, I shall be compelled to come to an agreement with the Russians, beat the West and then, after their defeat, turn against the Soviet Union with all my forces. I need the Ukraine so that they can not starve me out as happened in the last war.” (Roy Dennan “Missed Chances,” Indigo, London 1997, p. 65). Hitler called the coming conflict “the war of the engines” (“Motorenkrieg”). In reality the German army used 600,000 horses in addition to the 200,000 trucks, which were less dependable than the horses according to Stephen Badsey, “World War II Battle Plans” 2000, p. 96.
Here is an extract from of Jan Peczkis’ Amazon review of POLAND, S.O.E, AND THE ALLIES, by Jozef Garlinski. It is obvious that the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact had been far more than a tactical or protective move by the Russians. “Communist apologists sometimes claim that the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact had only been a clever move by the Soviets, to buy more time. Far from a mere nonaggression pact, it was a clear act of Communist-Nazi collaboration. The Soviets sent 900,000 tons of crude oil, 500,000 tons of iron ore, 500,000 tons of phosphates, and many other militarily-significant goods, to Nazi Germany (p. 40).”
Earlier, Stalin fearful of a two front war by Germany and Japan against the USSR decided to stop the Japanese Kwantung Army in Manchuko by a Soviet offensive in August 1939. According to The Oxford Companion to World War II (Oxford University Press, 1995) Soviet general Grigory Zhukov was the first in history to use the blitz-krieg tactics. These tactic were developed jointly by the Germans and the Soviets on Soviet polygons after the Treaty of Rapallo of April 16, 1922. From May 28, 1939 the largest air battles in history up to that time were fought in Asia and involved 140 to 200 Soviet and Japanese aircraft (A. Stella, Khalkhin-Gol, “The Forgotten War”, Journal of Contemporary History, 18, 1983).
Stalin, concerned that the Japanese aimed to cut the Trans-Siberian railway, send Zhukov to organize a counteroffensive using 35 infantry battalions, 20 cavalry squadrons, 500 aircraft and 500 of the new and powerful T34 tanks. This force outnumbered the forces of the advancing Kwantung Army. On August 20, 1939. Zhukov launched a surprise offensive and in ten days inflicted massive casualities on the Japanese. “Zhukov’s essential achievement lay in combining tanks, artillery, aircraft and men in an integrated offensive for the first time in modern war. By 31 August, the Russians completed what they described as the most impeccable encirclement of the enemy army since Hannibal beat the Romans at Cannae. The 23rd Division of the Kwantung Army was virtually wiped out, and at least 18,000 Japanese were killed.”(P. Snow “Nomonhan -the Unknown Victory”, History Today, July 1990).
“Hitler’s Nazi-Soviet Pact of 23 August 1939, seen by the Japanese government as a betrayal of the anti-Comintern Pact, reinforced Japan’s decision to use Hitler, but never to trust him. The Nazi-Soviet pact was announced during a Japanese military disaster. … Hostilities ended officially on September 16, 1939…” (Laurie Barber, “Checkmate at the Russian Border: Russian-Japanese Conflict before Pearl Harbour”, 2000). The next day, on September 17, 1939 the Soviets, free of the armed conflict with Japan, invaded Poland. The Soviets were aware that the French were not about to keep their promise to attack Germany, when 70 percent of German forces were engaged in Poland, despite the fact that France had more tanks than Germany.

Stalin realized his mistake in killing thousands of Polish prisoners of war in 1940 including the Katyn mass execution of Polish officers, when in 1940 there was no trench warfare in France as he expected. Instead of being stuck in France and give enough time to the Russian Army to recover from the purges of the 1930ties, Hitler was victorious and could attack Russia in 1941. Russia had to depend on the help from the U.S.A. and could have used the thousand of murdered Polish p.o.w’s on the German front.

Russian cover-up of the shameful Ribbentrop-Mołotov Pact still goes on. Now after repeated world-wide condemnation of the Stalin-Hitler Pact The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) have again “declassified the documents telling about secrets of the Polish politics” in 1935-1945, including negotiations “of high-ranking Foreign Ministry officials,” members of the Defence Ministry and secret services of Poland, according to the news agency RIA Novosti reports, and referring to the chief of the SVR public relations and mass media bureau Sergei Ivanov, who tries to put Poland, the true victim of WWII, in a worst possible light.

List otwarty do:

Prezesa Rady Ministrów RP
- Donalda Tuska

Marszałka Sejmu RP
- Bronisława Komorowskiego

Marszałka Senatu RP
- Bohdana Borusewicza

Przekazany do wiadomości Prezydenta RP
- Lecha Kaczyńskiego

Szanowni Panie Premierze i Panowie Marszałkowie,

Zwracamy się do Panów, jako do osób, które pełnią najważniejsze funkcje państwowe i zgodnie z Konstytucją RP ponoszą pełną odpowiedzialność za sytuację, która budzi nasze głębokie zaniepokojenie.

Uznaliśmy, że ten niedobry stan rzeczy nie może już dłużej trwać i powinniśmy Panom przypomnieć konstytucyjne obowiązki, które potwierdzone są w słowach złożonej przez Panów przysięgi:

“…a dobro Ojczyzny oraz pomyślność obywateli będą dla mnie zawsze najwyższym nakazem”

oraz

“Uroczyście ślubuję…. czynić wszystko dla pomyślności Ojczyzny i dobra obywateli”.

Bardzo krytycznie oceniamy Panów działania wchodzące w zakres powyższych słów przysięgi, natomiast pragniemy zwrócić uwagę na karygodne zaniedbania, które wręcz przeczą tym przysięgom. Chodzi o to, że poddane Waszej odpowiedzialności i kontroli służby państwowe jawnie przeszkadzają i blokują ważne inicjatywy oddolne, uniemożliwiając rozwój pomyślności i dobra obywateli.

Pragniemy naszym listem zwrócić uwagę na pełną odpowiedzialność Panów za tę sytuację i zwrócić się z dramatycznym wezwaniem, abyście przestali szkodzić Polsce, lub zwolnili pełnione przez siebie stanowiska dla polityków, którzy pragną dobrze służyć Narodowi.

Polskę od wielu lat gnębi głęboki, wielowymiarowy kryzys, tym bardziej groźny, że zaczyna obejmować również śmiertelne zmęczenie ducha Narodu, będące skutkiem wielokrotnego załamywania nadziei. Polacy, jak powietrza, potrzebują nowej, realistycznej wizji jak wyjść z tej sytuacji. Potrzebują ukazania przejrzystego kierunku i programu działania, by pobudzić powszechną aktywność, która jest niezbędna dla dokonania zasadniczego zwrotu w biegu polskich spraw. Tym bardziej ci Polacy, którzy nie poddają się zniechęceniu i podejmują różne pożyteczne przedsięwzięcia, muszą być wspierani przez władze państwowe i chronieni przed nieodpowiedzialnymi decyzjami, które szkodzą i blokują takie inicjatywy.

Inicjatywy związane z Radiem Maryja są pod tym względem zupełnie wyjątkowym zjawiskiem. Z jednej strony w skrajnie niesprzyjających warunkach tworzą imponująco pożyteczne dzieła, które przysparzają dobra naszej Ojczyźnie i budują wspólnotę nawiązującą do najlepszych tradycji narodowych. Rodzina Radia Maryja to, naszym zdaniem, najbardziej wartościowa część świadomego swych obowiązków Narodu, która obejmuje cały przekrój społeczny – od środowisk akademickich, przez grona przedsiębiorców, lekarzy, nauczycieli, rolników, po robotników przechowujących sztandary Solidarności – od wchodzącej w dojrzałe życie młodzieży, po ludzi starszych, wnoszących bogate doświadczenie i życiową mądrość. Miłość Ojczyzny i wierność Bogu, to przymioty społeczności związanej w Rodzinę Radia Maryja, które wyzwalają bezprzykładne poświęcenie, stojące u źródeł powodzenia wielu przedsięwzięć. Tych ludzi nie wolno nikomu obrażać, ani słowem, ani niegodziwymi czynami.

Z drugiej strony wszystkie przedsięwzięcia związane z Rodziną Radia Maryja powstają w atmosferze trudnej do zrozumienia wrogości, która przejawia się nie tylko w tworzonych sztucznie przeszkodach i złośliwych blokadach, ale także w demonstrowanej publicznie niechęci, przez różne wypowiedzi i obraźliwe komentarze osób publicznych, których zachowania nie sposób dłużej tolerować. Także osoby pełniące najwyższe funkcje państwowe uczestniczą w tym procederze i nie spotykają się z adekwatną reakcją władz państwowych.

Jaskrawym przykładem naruszenia konstytucyjnych powinności jest to wszystko, co wiąże się z całą serią działań bezprawnie blokujących przyznane już fundusze na Wyższą Szkołę Kultury Społecznej i Medialnej, a także na badawczy projekt geotermalny w Toruniu. Mamy do czynienia z niespotykanym paradoksem – badania, które mogą się okazać niezwykle ważne dla przyszłości naszej Ojczyzny, nie są podejmowane przez władze państwowe. Co więcej, nadzwyczajne wysiłki, by takie badania przeprowadzić, zainicjowane przez małe grono Ojców Redemptorystów i wspierane przez rzesze ofiarnych ludzi, są przez władze państwowe sabotowane.

Ta sprawa jest pilnie obserwowana przez Naród i kiedyś trzeba będzie za ten sabotaż ponieść odpowiedzialność. Jakby tego było mało, ostatnio dowiadujemy się o kolejnych działaniach, które mają na celu utrudnianie pożytecznych inicjatyw Rodziny Radia Maryja. Wielokrotnie już kontrolowane fundacje “Lux Veritatis” i “Nasza Przyszłość” mają być ponownie w sposób nękający kontrolowane, aby ograniczyć ich możliwości działania. Ta metoda ubezwłasnowolnienia przedsiębiorstw i wszelkiej oddolnej aktywności jest od dawna stosowanym narzędziem niszczenia dobra i pomyślności indywidualnych Polaków, a także całego Narodu i nie ma żadnej wątpliwości, że taki charakter mają także te kontrole – decyzje o tych kontrolach podjęto gdzieś w pobliżu Panów odpowiedzialności.

Wzywamy Panów
do opamiętania!

Przestańcie szkodzić Polsce!

Denoting burning stake of the final solution!

Which meant to culminate with the six million burnt offering to the insatiable Yahweh, purportedly obligatory before aliyah to proceed. No wonder religiously indoctrinated fanatics were deeply divided as to the scriptural legitimacy in a treyf creation Jewish utopia in Palestine. In the meantime gigantic internment with several millions of the scapegoated Jews lasted for 130 years, during 1791-1917 period, in anticipation of the sacrificial inferno to come. Hence the immense significance ultimately attributed to the realised Holocaust.

“Russia has since 1890 adopted a deliberate plan to expel or exterminate six millions of its people for no other reason than that they refuse to become members of the Greek Church, but prefer to remain Jews. To carry out this purpose, it has used several methods. Wholesale assassinations (called pogroms), have been employed in order to arouse the religious fanaticism, the greed and the savagery of the needy, the ignorant and the depraved among the Russian people. Horrible as these pogroms are, their effects are trivial compared with those which have followed other methods countenanced by that Government”.

“The Jewish inhabitants of the congested Pale of Settlement are being harassed by restrictions on their ordinary activities, by practical denial to a serious extent of the right to educate their children, and by having thrust upon them by force, large numbers of their co-religionists who had previously settled in other places within the Empire and had there been usefully employed. By this insidious process, the Russian Government wickedly and artificially creates unnatural conditions that enable it to twist economic and social laws into the service of persecution, and it believes that by their operation the ultimate expulsion or destruction of the Jews of Russia is assured”.

Denoting burning stake of the final solution!

Which meant to culminate with the six million burnt offering to the insatiable Yahweh, purportedly obligatory before aliyah to proceed. No wonder religiously indoctrinated fanatics were deeply divided as to the scriptural legitimacy in a treyf creation Jewish utopia in Palestine. In the meantime gigantic internment with several millions of the scapegoated Jews lasted for 130 years, during 1791-1917 period, in anticipation of the sacrificial inferno to come. Hence the immense significance ultimately attributed to the realised Holocaust.

“Russia has since 1890 adopted a deliberate plan to expel or exterminate six millions of its people for no other reason than that they refuse to become members of the Greek Church, but prefer to remain Jews. To carry out this purpose, it has used several methods. Wholesale assassinations (called pogroms), have been employed in order to arouse the religious fanaticism, the greed and the savagery of the needy, the ignorant and the depraved among the Russian people. Horrible as these pogroms are, their effects are trivial compared with those which have followed other methods countenanced by that Government”.

“The Jewish inhabitants of the congested Pale of Settlement are being harassed by restrictions on their ordinary activities, by practical denial to a serious extent of the right to educate their children, and by having thrust upon them by force, large numbers of their co-religionists who had previously settled in other places within the Empire and had there been usefully employed. By this insidious process, the Russian Government wickedly and artificially creates unnatural conditions that enable it to twist economic and social laws into the service of persecution, and it believes that by their operation the ultimate expulsion or destruction of the Jews of Russia is assured”.

Gdañsk 24.01.2001

Mr. Norman G. Finkelstein

At first I would like to introduce myself. My name is Jakub Szadaj. I preside the Independent Jewish Faith Commune in Gdañsk. Browsing the Internet Journal, I have come across publications concerning the Holocaust and restitution of the post-Jewish property. I have found the interview you gave to the journal Rzeczpospolita entitled Who draws profits from the Holocaust?, as well as an interview for PAP: Norman G. Finkelstein on the “Holocaust industry”. This was very interesting to read, particularly because these topics are close to my heart. I have found somebody who shares my opinion that the Jews living in the restitution areas are more eligible to be given back their property than the International Jewish Organizations. During the negotiations in Warsaw in 1999, a project was submitted for establishing a common foundation of the Union of Jewish Congregations and the World Jewish Restitution Organization, presided by Ronald S. Lauder. The solutions suggested therein for the Polish Jews associated in the Jewish Congregations are unacceptable.

I have the shorthand notes from the negotiations between the Union of Jewish Congregations (ZGW¯) in Warsaw represented by: Andrzej Zozula, Piotr Kadlcik and Feliks Lipman, and the WJRO, represented by Kalman Sultanik, Arye Edelist, Naphtali Lavie. The negotiations focused on the agreement to divide the property of Polish Jews. The Almanac published by the ZGW¯ states that: “If a Jewish commune or the ZGW¯ are dissolved, their property will be assigned to the WJRO”. The Gdañsk Jewish Commune, the biggest one in Poland, has been dissolved under some petty pretext, in order to transfer its property onto the WJRO. Financial support for the WJRO – whose wealth is not a secret – now that we need these funds ourselves, seems absurd. We have invested a lot of work and effort in reclaiming at least part of the Jewish property. Allowing this property to be taken over by the WJRO is utterly outrageous – it is evidently detrimental to Jews in Poland and the Polish State.

Most surprisingly, the project was supported by the ZGW¯ in Warsaw. Since February 2000 we have had our own Commune, independent of the ZGW¯ in Warsaw. I rejoice because of that, but at the same time it saddens me that such a small community that Jews form in Poland should be divided and antagonized. I represent Jewish nationalism focused on Jewish Communes and congregations whose duties include the protection of the members of Jewish Communes and citizens of Jewish extraction. I am in favor of the opinion that the International Jewish Organizations are assemblies of interest groups whose intentions are in contradiction with the rights of Jewish nationals. I do not want to and I cannot accept something that contradicts the very idea of post-Jewish property restitution.

The property returned to Jews in Poland and the money acquired from it should remain in Poland and serve the Jews, rather than be taken abroad by the Foundation managed by a multimillionaire. I wish to express my respect and admiration for the man who, being such a well-known political scientist, a renowned expert in Israeli-Palestine affairs, an author of many books, openly and fearlessly speaks his mind. He is not afraid to accuse the Jewish leaders in the USA of taking advantage of their compatriots’ martyrdom for their own political and personal ends.

Such actions deserve to be praised and fully approved.

I hope that our relations will develop further,

Yours respectfully, Jakub Szadaj, Gdañsk.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On September 1, 1939, at 04:45 local time 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II at Westerplatte Poland with no American Delegation. Where is president Obama, Vice President Biden or Secretary of state Hillary Clinton?

Polish American Community and people of Poland one of the US strongest allied are outrage that US is not sending high ranking delegation to this event.

70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II at Westerplatte will be attended by German chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin and other 69 Heads of States and Governments will Participante.Among those expected to be present at the Westerplatte monument on 1 September are also the prime ministers of Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, the Baltic states, Finland, as well as European Parliament president Jerzy Buzek. France and the UK, which were Poland’s allies in 1939, will be represented by foreign ministers Bernard Kouchner and David Miliband.

But not from United States of America

To the entire world Westerplatte ( the Polish Thermopile ) in Poland is like Pearl Harbor to American people.

Westerplatte (1967) part03 [English Subtitles] Polish war movie

Clips from CBC mini documentary about Poland’s contribution to the war effort. Polish pilots of the RAF. Betrayal of Poland by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin.

Over the course of the violent engagement some 2,600 German soldiers fought against the 205-strong garrison of stalwart Poles. The exact number of German casualties has never been disclosed, but is assumed to be quite high in comparison to the Polish figures – of the 205 Polish soldiers defending the outpost, only 14 perished (including the Polish radio operator, later executed for refusing to divulge radio codes to the German side) while 53 were wounded.

On September 1, 1939, at 04:45 local time, as Germany began its invasion of Poland, Schleswig-Holstein started to shell the Polish garrison. This was followed by a repelled attack by German naval infantry. Another two assaults that day were repelled as well. Over the coming days, the Germans repeatedly bombarded Westerplatte with naval and heavy field artillery along with dive-bombing raids by Junkers Ju 87 Stukas. Repeated attacks of 3500 German soldiers were repelled by the 180 Polish soldiers for seven days. Major Henryk Sucharski had been informed that no help from the Polish Army would come but still he decided to defend to relieve attacks on Polish coast – most of the German forces were engaged in the attacks on Westerplatte. On September 7th Major Henryk Sucharski decided to surrender due to lack of ammunition and supplies. As a sign of honor for the soldiers of Westerplatte, German commander, Gen. Eberhardt, allowed Mjr. Sucharski to keep his officer’s sword while being taken prisoner.

Westerplatte Defenders Repulse Attacks From Sea, Air and Land; 70 to 200 Polish ‘Suicide Troops’ Shatter Two German Attempts to Storm Fortress After Plane and Ship Bombardments.

A band of Polish soldiers who for six days fought a “battle of the Alamo” under constant German siege today surrendered Westerplatte Fortress in Danzig Harbor, where the first shot of the European war was fired, according to announcement in Berlin
Westerplatte – il cimitero dei soldati caduti durante i combattimenti nel settembre 1939. Al centro la lapide del comandante, il maggiore Henryk Sucharski. L’avamposto militare di Westerplatte, secondo i piani strategici di difesa, doveva resistere al nemico soltanto 12 ore in attesa dell’arrivo dei soccorsi. Aveva invece resistito sette giorni agli attacchi furiosi della nave corazzata “Schlezwig-Holstein”, della fanteria e delle forze aeree tedesche.

Sep 1, 1939 – Am 1. September 1939, einen Tag nachdem der Senat die Verdienstmedaille Danziger Kreuz beschlossen hatte, beschoss die Wehrmacht die Westerplatte, und im Gefecht um das Polnische Postamt in Danzig‎ wurde dieses Gebäude erstürmt. Zudem trafen Truppen der.

Sep 1, 1939 – Pouco faltava para as cinco da manhã de 1 de Setembro de 1939, quando o couraçado alemão Schleswig-Holstein, ancorado na foz do Vístula no interior da Cidade Livre de Gdańsk começou a bombardear a guarnição militar polaca em Westerplatte.

Sep 2, 1939 – “The commander in chief greets the gallant garrison at Westerplatte and expects every man to stick to his sanguinary post.” BY ANDREAS BACKER. I … The call for sacrifice was directed at the “suicide battalion” which mans the Polish munitions dump of Westerplatte off Danzig harbor.

Sep 4, 1939 – After three days of bombardment from sea and air, a little Polish garrison still held the Westerplatte munitions base in Danzig Harbor tonight. … Thirty airplanes dropped between fifty and sixty bombs on the Westerplatte yesterday, but the Poles still retaliated with machine-gun fire.

Sep 7, 1939 – When this writer left the Nazi-held city of Danzig yesterday morning a small force of Polish soldiers–between 70 and 200 of them–still resisted valiantly in Westerplatte fortress after four days of a fierce siege. Machine-gun fire from the Polish garrison shattered completely two …

Sep 8, 1939 – A band of Polish soldiers who for six days fought a “battle of the Alamo” under constant German siege today surrendered Westerplatte Fortress in … The Schleswig-Holstein steamed into position early is the day; trained her gone on the Westerplatte and blasted away: All that , day the …

Sep 10, 1939 – They were aimed at the Westerplatte, a small Polish fortress, on a Danzig peninsula.. For nearly a week after Danzig had been proclaimed by Adolf Hitler a part of the Reich and German troops had occupied the city, the Polish garrison of the Westerplatte held out. …

Today the ruins of the barracks and two blockhouses – the only structures on the island – still remain. One of the blockhouses has been converted into a museum commemorating the battle and those who fought there, with two shells from the Schleswig-Holstein ironically propping the entrance. A placid 25m tall stone monument now marks the site of this infamous exchange that preceded the levelling of Gdansk’s Old Town and sparked a worldwide conflict that would result in immeasurable suffering (particularly in Poland). Though it is outside the city, Westerplatte is a worthwhile venture for anyone visiting Gdansk; like so many sights in Poland, it is haunted by it’s troubling history in the face of a beautiful natural environment.

Gdansk’s picturesque Westerplatte peninsula has the unhappy distinction of being the site of the official start of the Second World War. A small forested island separated from Gdansk by the harbour channel, Westerplatte was established as a Polish military outpost during the interwar period, equipped with one 75mm field gun, two 37mm antitank guns (slightly mystifying for a coastal defense), four mortars and several medium machine guns, but lacking any true fortifications. By the autumn of 1939, the Polish garrison occupying Westerplatte comprised of 182 soldiers expected to withstand a potential attack for twelve hours.

In late August, 1939, under the suspect pretense of an amiable courtesy visit, the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein dropped anchor in the channel off Westerplatte and on September 1, at exactly 04:45 local time, began it’s barrage of the Polish outpost with its superior 280 and 150mm guns. Thus began Germany’s invasion of Poland, igniting the powderkeg that would explode into World War II.

Expecting an easy victory, the German offensive was sternly repelled by Polish small arms and machine gun fire, and suffered unexpected losses during two more assaults upon Westerplatte the same day. The only Polish 75mm gun was destroyed after discharging 28 shells into the German position across the channel. Despite a German naval infantry invasion, sustained bombardment by heavy artillery and diving airraids from German warplanes, the Polish garrison repulsed the Germans for seven days, before the depleted unit, suffering from exhaustion, severe injury and a shortage of food, water, ammunition and medical supplies, was forced to surrender on September 7th.

A Song of the Soldiers of Westerplatte
Boleslaw Prus

When their days had been filled
and it was time to die in the summer,
They went straight to heaven in a coach-and-four,
the soldiers of Westerplatte.

(Summer was beautiful that year.)

They sang: “Ah, ‘tis nothing
that our wounds were so painful,
for now it is sweet to walk
the heavenly fields.”

(On earth that year there was plenty of heather for bouquets.)

In Gdansk we stood like a wall
in defiance of the German offensive,
now we soar among the clouds,
we soldiers of Westerplatte.
Those with keen sense of sight
and sound are said to have heard
in the clouds the measured step
of the Maratime Batallion.

This was the song they heard: “We’ll
take advantage of the sunshine
and bask in the warm days
in the heather fields of paradise.

But when the cold wind blows
and sorrow courses the earth,
We’ll float down to the center of Warsaw,
The soldiers of Westerplatte.”

-translated by Walter Whipple

1st September 1939
At 04.30 Stuka dive-bombers prematurely bombed the bridge at Tczew in the Pomeranian Corridor. SS troops dressed in Polish uniforms attacked the radio station at Gleiwitz and broadcast inflammatory statements urging Polish minorities to take up arms against Hitler. For a touch of realism, several bodies of concentration inmates dressed in Polish uniforms, were left behind as ‘evidence’ for journalists (Zaloga and Madej, 1991) to report on.

The Free City of Danzig was heavily shelled and bombed, inflicting heavy casualties upon the civilian population and military coastal defences or navy flotillas. In Danzig, the defenders, particularly civilian volunteers were shot. The Army Pomorze faced the 4th Army whose tactic was to isolate them in the north from the rest of the Polish Forces and then link up with the Third Army and attack Warsaw.

Daylong fighting produced at times, scenes of sheer heroism. The Pomorska Cavalry Brigade had been in contacts with the German 20th Motorized Infantry Division. Colonel Masterlarz had half the unit mount up and attempted a surprise attack from the rear. Catching an infantry battalion by surprise in a woodland clearing, the sabre attack wiped them out. Legends and myths were borne of cavalry units taking on armoured vehicles. However, what is forgotten, is that the cavalry units carried anti-tank weapons for rapid deployment (Zaloga and Madej, 1991).

On the Prussian Front the German Third Army broke through defences to the north of Warsaw. Ground attacks started at 05.00 and aimed to knock out the heavy fortifications at Mlawa. It was on this front that the Polish Mazowiecka Cavalry Brigade had a number of sabre clashes with the German First Cavalry Brigade (Zaloga and Madej,1991) thus marking an end to mounted warfare. The Polish Special Operational Group Narew had virtually no contacts with German forces due to the restraining action of the Polish Third Army and therefore effectively denied rapid gains on this front.

The heaviest fighting took place in the Southwest, a front covered by Army Lodz and further south, Army Krakow. Army Poznan in the centre saw little action or contact on the first day of fighting. The German Eighth and Tenth Armies pushed through the massive densely forested areas with major infantry clashes en route. The Wolynska Cavalry Brigade successfully countered attacks by the German 4th Panzer Division whose poor co-ordination in attack delayed advance and lost equipment. This front was geographicaly the most diverse and faced the largest concentration of mechanized troops. The heaviest fighting was around the industrial zone of Katowice. In the south, the 44th and 45th Infantry Divisions attacked throught the Jablonkow Pass near Karwina and Cieszyn which were lightly defended. In the southern mountainous area, the XXII Panzer Corps attacked just below Nowy Targ at the Dunajec river which was defended by the 1st KOP Regiment and National Guard Zakopane Battalion. Army Krakow was forced to commit support to stem the attack which was temporarily held.

Outflanked and harassed by German guerrilla units, Army Krakow had to deal with a large number of armed German units set up by the Abwehr to carry out sabotage.

Once the Germans broke through the various fronts, poor communications impeded any chance of reforming on a grand scale. From the 10th until 18th September Polish units were able to reform quickly and still were able to harass and inflict serious damage. For field commanders like Anders, confusion and contradictory orders added to the pain and humiliation of the inevitable defeat. Units attempted to move south-east despite heavy co-ordinated artillery bombardments. Soldiers and civilians who were able to bear arms bravely defended and resisted for as long as possible as they moved behind the Vistula. Encirclement began and 60,000 troops were destroyed at Radom. Partisan units were organized and regular army units kept moving southeast in order to gain supplies of food and munitions and regroup to avoid annihilation once the Russians entered the war on 17th September.

Field commanders moved as many of the remnants of the army to an escape route which led to Romania and Hungary . Units breached German lines on 22nd September before Soviet troops blocked all routes. Poland finally fell on the 6th October as the last organized resistance was crushed at Hel and Kock. Zaloga and Madej (1991) estimated the Germans took 587,000 prisoners and the Soviets 200,000. Anders (1949) estimated between 200 – 300,000 escaped into Romania and Hungary through the Dukla Pass. Those who were caught by the Soviets may have been far higher (Anders, 1949). Fiedotov, an NKVD general estimated it to be nearer 475,000. However, if all those arrested including White Russians, Jews and political prisoners, the number was between 1.5 and 1.6m people. Transported to the Gulags, few survived.

One of Poland’s greatest gifts towards the war effort was to have captured an Ultra machine (Stafford, 1997) early in the conflict. The true value of this encryption machine was instantly recognised by Polish and French code-breakers. Unfortunately, true recognition of its significance came later and the thanks given to the Poles hardly covers couple of sentences in either archives or in historical text..

Please write letters and call office of the President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton why US is not sending high ranking delegation to Poland 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II?

You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Please include your e-mail address
Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461

TTY/TDD
Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121

Vice President Joe Biden
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Rahm Emanuel

Deputy Chiefs of Staff
Jim Messina
Mona Sutphen

Senior Advisors
David Axelrod
Valerie Jarrett
Pete Rouse

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton

U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Main Switchboard:
202-647-4000

Protestant fundamentalism originated among Anglo-Saxons because of the obligation, introduced several centuries ago in Protestant (Calvinist) sects in Britain to read the Old Testament. This resulted in judaizing of British culture, which made Britain vulnerable to the influence of Jewish extremists based on the principles of the Talmud.

The Talmud teaches that Jews are not obligated to treat non-Jews in accordance with the Ten Commandments and refers to the non-Jews (Goims) as cattle. On the other hand there, there have always been Jewish writers and thinkers, such as Israel Shahak, who openly condemned the views presented in the Talmud and saw in them the source of many misfortunes. However, radical Zionists, ruling today in Israel, apply Talmudic precepts in relation to Arabs and Persians.

Jeff’a Sharlet’s, book „The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power” (Harper Collin, 2008, ISBN: 00605597 990), describes the heretical Christian point of view held by the elite cult of the richest Protestant fundamentalists in the US. The Cult glorifies wealth and power while it cultivates contempt for for compassion and mercy.

Reviewers claim that this book is very thoroughly documented and proves that a conspiracy of millionaires and billionaires among fundamentalist in the US is fighting to take over the world. They consider themselves “chosen” by God, as proven by their personal wealth, as result of divine grace and reward for belonging to their sect. Among them are many congressmen, generals, and government officials controlled by “The Family,” both in the United States and
In the so called “banana republics,” dominated by the US.

The author, Jeff Sarlet is so far the only journalist who succeeded in documenting the activities of the hidden elite, headquartered in Arlington, on the outskirts of Washington DC, “The Family,” at the core of American fundamentalist Protestant power, was originally created along the lines of European fascism in 1935 by Abraham Vereide, who organized the wealthy internationalist elite.

This secret “Family” elite is prospering today. Is most public activity is the annual White House – Congressional “Preayer Breakfest” innagurated during the administration of President Eisenhower, in the 1950’s. Central to the group faith are belief in the “biblical capitaliusm,” U.S. military power, and global domination by the U.S. Many operational principles are derived by studying thew methods of Lenin, Hitler, and Mao, to be applied in the name of peace in the subordination of the governments or through “regime change.”

Sharlet documents how far this secret elite deviates from the generally accepted view of Protestant fundamentalism and shows how influential it has been in the “war against terror” and earlier in the “Cold War” as well as in the “free enterprise” neo-colonial globalization. Sharlet writes that instead of asking what secret elite wants, one should inquire into what they already have done.

As Sharlet describes it, this elite treats Jesus as a kind of managing director, lobbyist, and even fascist leader. They have had an enormous impact on the beliefs of Americans in the 20th century and on U.S. imperialist policy in the 21st century, through their secret machinations which have been unsuspected by most Americans.

Practically unknown elite of Protestant fundamentalist heretics controls American nuclear arsenal and is mainly motivated by the desire to accumulate personal wealth to the greatest extent possible. One byproduct of their beliefs is a contempt for the historical view of Christianity as a religion of mercy, compassion and concern for the less fortunate. Ironically, according to Sharlet, this elite views the U.S. as having been created as a “Christian nation.” In general they make efforts to avoid clashing with Talmudic radical Zionists in the pursuit of mutually agreeable goals.

Thanks to Sharlet’s book, for the first time, American public gain insight into how an economic and political elite is able to direct U.S. policy in spite of denying the most fundamental Christian principles while considering itself a Christian organization. Their heresy elevates selfishness and lust for dominance to the level of Christian virtue.

Israel’s second largest bank will be forced to defend itself in court in the coming weeks over claims it is withholding tens of millions of dollars in “lost” accounts belonging to Jews who died in the Nazi death camps.

Bank Leumi has denied it holds any such funds despite a parliamentary committee revealing in 2004 that the bank owes at least $75 million to the families of several thousand Holocaust victims.

Analysts said the bank’s role is only the tip of an iceberg in which Israeli companies and state bodies could be found to have withheld billions of dollars invested by Holocaust victims in the country — dwarfing the high-profile reparations payouts from such European countries as Switzerland.

“All I want is justice,” said David Hillinger, 73, whose grandfather, Aaron, died in Auschwitz, a Nazi camp in Poland. Lawyers are demanding reparations of $100,000 for Bank Leumi accounts held by his father and grandfather.

The allegations against Bank Leumi surfaced more than a decade ago following research by Yossi Katz, an Israeli historian.

He uncovered bank correspondence in the immediate wake of the Second World War in which it cited “commercial secrecy” as grounds for refusing to divulge the names of account holders who had been killed in the Holocaust.

“I was shocked,” said Dr Katz, from Bar Ilan University near Tel Aviv. “My first reaction was: ‘My God, this isn’t Switzerland!’ ”

In 1998, following widespread censure, Swiss banks agreed to pay $1.25 billion in reparations after they there were accused of having profited from the dormant accounts of Holocaust victims.

Dr Katz’s revelations led to the establishment of a parliamentary committee in 2000 to investigate the behaviour of Israel’s banks. Its report came to light belatedly in 2004 after Bank Leumi put pressure on the government to prevent publication.

Investigators found thousands of dormant accounts belonging to Holocaust victims in several banks, though the lion’s share were located at Bank Leumi. Obstructions from Leumi meant many other account holders had probably not been identified, the investigators warned.

The parliamentary committee originally estimated the accounts it had located to be worth more than $160m, using the valuation formula applied to the Swiss banks. But under pressure from Leumi and the government, it later reduced the figure by more than half.

A restitution company was created in 2006 to search for account holders and return the assets to their families.

Meital Noy, a spokeswoman for the company, said it had been forced to begin legal proceedings this week after Bank Leumi had continued to claim that its findings were “baseless”.

The bank paid $5m two years ago in what it says was a “goodwill gesture”. Ms Noy called the payment “a joke”. She said 3,500 families, most of them in Israel, were seeking reparations from Bank Leumi.

The bank was further embarrassed by revelations in 2007 that one per cent of its shares — worth about $80 million — belonged to tens of thousands of Jews killed during the Holocaust.

Mr Hillinger, who was born in Belgium in 1936 and spent the Second Wold War hiding in southern France, today lives in Petah Tikva in central Israel.

He said before the outbreak of war his father and grandfather had invested money in the Anglo-Palestine Bank, the forerunner of Leumi, in the hope it would gain them a visa to what was then British-ruled Palestine.

Although his parents escaped the death camps, his grandparents were sent to Auschwitz and died in the gas chambers shortly after arrival.

Mr Hillinger said he had only learnt of the outstanding debt from Bank Leumi after his father, Moses, died in 1996. Papers showed the bank had paid his father “a pittance” in 1952 when he closed his account and that it had never returned his grandfather’s money.

When he wrote to Bank Leumi in 1998, it denied his grandfather had ever opened an account.

“My grandfather died because he was a Jew, and it is shameful that other Jews are exploiting his death,” he said. “We need to wake people up about this.”

A quarter of a million Holocaust survivors are reported to be in Israel, with one-third of them living in poverty, according to welfare organisations.

Shraga Elam, an Israeli investigative financial journalist based in Zurich, said after the war many Israelis showed little sympathy for the European Jewish refugees who arrived in Israel.

“David Ben Gurion [Israel’s first prime minister] notoriously called them ‘human dust’, and I remember as children we referred to them as sabonim, the Hebrew word for soap,” he said, in reference to the rumoured Nazi practice of making soap from Jewish corpses.

“In fact, I can’t think of any place in the world where [Holocaust] survivors are as badly treated as they are in Israel,” Mr Elam said.

He said Bank Leumi’s “lost” accounts were only a small fraction of Holocaust assets held by Israeli companies and the Israeli state that should have been returned. The total could be as much as $20bn.

He said European Jews had invested heavily in Palestine in the pre-war years, buying land, shares and insurance policies and opening bank accounts. During the Second World War Britain seized most of these assets as enemy property because the owners were living in Nazi-occupied lands.

In 1950 Britain repaid some $1.4 million to the new state of Israel, which was supposed to make reparations to the original owners.

However, little effort was made to trace them or, in the case of those who died in the Holocaust, their heirs. Instead the Israeli government is believed to have used the funds to settle new immigrants in Israel.

“These are huge assets, including real estate in some of the most desirable parts of Israel,” Mr Elam said.

Last year the Israeli media reported an investigation showing that the finance ministry destroyed its real estate files in the 1950s, apparently to conceal the extent of the state’s holding of Holocaust assets.

The case against Bank Leumi may end the generally muted criticism inside Israel of the banks’ role. Officials and even the families themselves have been concerned about the damage the case might do to Israel’s image as the guardian of Jewish interests.

In 2003 Ram Caspi, Bank Leumi’s lawyer, used such an argument before the parliamentary committee, warning its members that the US media “will say the Israeli banks also hide money, not just the Swiss”.

Organisations that led the campaign for reparations from European banks, such as the Jewish Claims Conference and the World Jewish Restitution Organisation, have also downplayed the role of the Israeli banks.

waht do you mean?

The Fedreal Reserve System is a private bank operating for profit and at the same time acting as a Central Bank of the United States independent of the federal government and of the president of the United States. It is printing American currency and controlling the monetarny policy of the country since 1913 and therefore today it is in control of the business cycle of inflation and depression, despite earlier warnings and clear statement in the Constitution of the United States that the federal government has the exclusive right to issue US currency.

Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1802: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
Contrary to Jefferson’s warning the Federal Reseve System continues to act as the central bank of United States. It was organized by Paul Warburg. It should be noticed that his brother Max Warburg, who resided in Germany was the president of the Rothschild Bank in Frankfurt on Main and controlled German banking during World War One.
Paul Warburg, was the main architect of the Federal Reserve System in U.S., an institution which played key role in financing American war effort during World War One, while Paul Warburg was its director. Federal Reserve System serves as the central bank in control of the monetary policy of U.S. and it has been from the beginning controlled by Jews, and operated free of any veto by the president of the United States. Federal Reserve System is no more “Federal” than is the “Federal Express,” private delivery enterprise.
Gary Allen writes that the Federal Reserve System is a tool used by mostly Jewish conspiracy, thanks to which, international bankers are able to increase, without any limits, state debts and derive from these debts colossal profits, using compounded interest and thereby have control over governments unable to pay their debts.
During the Wilson administration U.S. debt increased by 800% and it was increasing fast during Bush’s “war on terror,” especially because now the government of the United States, free of the gold standard, has monopoly to legally printing treasury bonds and Federal Reserve System can print dollar notes in any amount necessary to prevent bankruptcy and maintain dollars as the reserve currency in central banks and in trade on the world market of such commodities as crude oil, for example. The dollar printing monopoly makes dollars the safest currency in the world despite the huge deficits in foreign trade, for which deficit U.S. pays mainly with treasury bonds with guaranteed face value.
Two month before the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the conspiring bankers created the instrument for payment of the astronomical state debts, in form of the federal income tax, proportional to personal income, just as Karl Marks had demanded earlier, in his Communist Manifesto.
The bankers had reserved for themselves tax exemptions to minimize their tax burden and freely invest in revolutionary movements and war strategies, which serve the purpose of centralization of power in the name of homeland security etc. which today favors Jewish neoconservatives and gives them a chance to control the government by means of military-industrial-Zionist complex and to collect their profits and compound interests.
Allen believes that during World War One, Bernard Baruch had full control over the US economy, as the head of the “War Industries Board.” This board, had been planned twenty years earlier, by banker-conspirators. Baruch then obtained for himself over $200 million, in today’s dollars worth billions.
Paul Warburg had to resign from the Federal Reserve System, when it became known in America that his brother Max Warburg, was in charge of German state finances. The third of Warburg brothers, Felix, was a son-in-law of Jacob Schiff, who was the main partner of the New York firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in which firm the three Warburg brothers were also partners. Max Warburg was, as I mentioned, also in charge of Rothschild bank in Frankfurt, Germany.
Jacob Schiff successfully financed Leon Trotsky, with some $20 million and according to the book by a Russian general Arsene de Goulevich, “Tsardom and the Revolution,” received from Lenin’s government $100 million in gold during 1918-1922, paid directly to the firm Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in New York.
Bolshevik Revolution was financed also by Max Warburg and Olaf Aschberg using money from “Nye Banken” in Stockholm, Sweden. Schiff spent millions for the overthrow of the tsarist government first, then of the Kerensky government, and at the same time he spent ten million dollars for help for Jewish population in Russia.
Gary Allen believes that the same bankers dominated the terms of the Treaty of Versailles and prepared the next world war by financing Hitler’s regime, as a “reaction” to Bolshevism and as a trigger mechanism for the Second World War. It is known that at Versailles, in 1918, the French marshal Ferdinand Foche pointed to the free city of Gdańsk and correctly predicted that Gdańsk would be the pretext to start the WWII.
The career of Aleksander Helphand, the famous owner of the Wannsee palacial residence in Berlin, is described in the book by Z. A. B. Zeman and W. B. Scharlau: “The Merchant of Revolution – The Life of Alexander Israel Helphand (Parvus),” London, Oxford University Press, 1965.
In 1903 Helphand tutored Leon Trotsky on strategy of mass strikes and Marks’s original “revolution in permanence,” which later became Trotsky’s “permanent war for communism.” A century later, with the decline of communism, Jewish followers of Trotsky in New York, converted to radical Zionism and created the ideology of neo-conservatism, this time based on a “permanent war for democracy,” for building of a global empire and for benefit of the future hegemony of the state of Israel “from Niles in Egypt to Eufrates in Iraq.”
The roots and anatomy of the “three trillion dollar swindle” which caused the financial crisis of 2008, is well described by Frank Partnoy in his book “The Inside Story of a Wall Street Trader” (1997). Professor Partnoy holds degrees in mathematics and economics, as well as a law degree from Yale School of Law. Frank Partnoy is now an assistant professor of law at the University of San Diego, where he specializes in financial market regulation.

Frank Partnoy started as a “derivatives” salesman at First Boston, the investment bank in New York. “Derivatives” are a class of “financial instruments” known as the most profitable and the most dangerous products ever devised by the Wall Street “cabal,” where unsuspecting consumer is the prey.

Portnoy describes how Morgan Stanley earned the largest fee in history, 74.5 million dollars, devising a “derivative” on which a Japanese company lost millions, because it could not understand the risks of the unregulated market in derivatives (risk stated in fine print). Thus, Portnoy shows how the unregulated and private „Central Bank of the United States” allowed the present crisis to happen and wy this crisis is known as the “three trillion dollar swindle.”

Print Added: 2009-03-26

Antygoizm pochodzi z egotyzmu radykalnych Żydów i jest komplikowany przez żydowski problem genetyczny TSD, zwłaszcza wśród polskich i wschodnio-europejskich Żydów. Para zdrowych nosicieli tej genetycznej choroby ma 25% szans urodzenia dziecka nawiedzonego tą nieuleczalna chorobą. Z tego powodu małżeństwo nosicieli tej choroby chce jak najwcześniej dowiedzieć się czy poczęte przez nie dziecko nie ma we krwi dowodów na tę śmiertelną chorobę.

Na wypadek takiego nieszczęścia, rodzice nie-urodzonego jeszcze dziecka, domagają się prawa do legalnego przeprowadzenia zabiegu przerwania ciąży. Mimo tego, że niewielka część Żydów znajduje się w tej sytuacji, sprawa przerywania ciąży została dołączona do wywrotowego arsenału żydowskiego razem z niby obroną praw homoseksualistów, kobiet, etc. Bardziej radykalną bronią żydowską jest legalny w Izraelu handel żywym towarem, pornografia i handel syntetycznymi narkotykami, których przemysł izraelski produkuje najwięcej na świecie.

Talmud jest główną kodyfikacją strategii żydowskiej przetrwania. Kodyfikacja ta powstała na przestrzeni kilku wieków i została ukończona w Babilonie, czyli dzisiejszym Bagdadzie, około 500 lat po urodzeniu Chrystusa. Głównym elementem Talmudu jest przekonanie o wyższość Żydów nad nie-Żydami oraz podstawowa zasada, że dziesięć przykazań wyłącznie dotyczy Żydów i że nie-Żydzi mogą być traktowani jak bydło. Talmud również daje wskazówki Żydom jak powinni pasożytować n a gojach, czyli nie-Żydach.

Niestety kapelani armii Izraela nauczają Żydów-żołnierzy, żeby postępowali według Talmudu i zabijali bez miłosierdzia Arabów, jako faktycznych lub potencjalnych wrogów. Znęcanie się Żydów nad Arabami w Palestynie ma na celu spowodowanie Arabów do opuszczenia przez nich ich stron rodzinnych. Pisze o tym dokładnie profesor Izrael Shahak w jego książce pod tytułem „Żydowskie Dzieje i Religia: Żydzi i Goje – XXX wieków historii.”

Notorycznie, Żydzi kultywują mit, że zawsze są krzywdzeni przez gojów. Żydzi sami nienawidzą okazywania skruchy, za krzywdy wyrządzane przez Żydów innym. Faktycznie ofiary krzywd wyrządzonych przez Żydów, są nagminnie przez nich nienawidzone. Stąd pochodzi niesłychana nienawiść do chłopów polskich i ukraińskich w literaturze żydowskiej. Lata terroru Jakuba Bermana, w czasie dziesięcioletnich rządów żydowskich w Polsce z ramienia Sowietów, oraz działalność żydowskiego ruchu roszczeniowego, są obecnie jednymi z głównych powodów stałych napaści żydowskich na Polaków, w prasie kontrolowanej przez Żydów.

Najbardziej szkodliwy dla Polaków był i jest żydowski ruch roszczeniowy, kierowany przez aferzystów w Ameryce, którzy pomnożyli wielokrotnie ilość Żydów europejskich, którzy przeżyli wojnę pod niemiecką okupacją, pobrali dla tych ludzi odszkodowanie w wysokości wielu miliardów dolarów z Niemiec i ze Szwajcarii, a następnie pieniądze te sprzeniewierzyli. Dlatego profesor Norman Finkelstein, autor książki „Holocaust Industry,” uważa żydowski ruch roszczeniowy za bandę oszustów.

Kevin MacDonald, profesor University of Southern California, opisuje w swojej książce o Żydach pod tytułem „Kultura Krytyki,” jak w powojennych państwach satelickich, Żydzi kierowali sowieckim aparatem terroru. W Polsce, czynił to Jakub Berman, który mianował Żydów na kluczowe stanowiska w komunistycznym aparacie terroru. Starsi Polacy pamiętają lata terroru Jakuba Bermana.

Podobnie w Rosji, po rewolucji, Żydzi pomagali stworzyć aparat terroru, w tradycji „tysiącletniego terroru rabinów,” który trwał do połowy 19go wieku i jest szczegółowo opisany przez profesora Izraela Shahak’a w wyżej wymienionej książce. Żyd Laureny Beria, któremu udowodniono jego Żydostwo wkrótce po śmierci Satlina, przygotował począwszy od 3go pazdzienika, 1939 roku do wiosny 1940 roku, tak zwaną imienną „listę katyńską” w celu egzekucji ponad 25,000 Polaków, przez NKWD.

W Polsce, po 1944 roku, szalał przez 10 lat terror Jakuba Bermana, który mordował dziesiątki tysięcy patriotów polskich i przygotowywał na masowe zesłanie żołnierzy Armii Krajowej do Rosji. Trudno pogodzić książki J. T. Grossa, z tymi faktami historycznymi. Niestety twórczość Grosa idzie w parze z perfidnym oczernianiem Polaków przez prezydenta Aleksandra Kwaśniewskiego, za pomocą przeprosin i skruchy, podczas gdy w rzeczywistości Żydzi, którzy przeżyli wojnę masowo mordowali Polaków-patriotów, w ramach aparatu terroru Jakuba Bermana.

Taktyka ogłupiania społeczeństwa polskiego jest dobrze zilustrowana w sugestywnym tekście Kwaśniewskiego, który występując w jarmułce powiedział, że wraża przeprosiny i skruchę „w imieniu tych Polaków, którym sumienie nakazuje tak postąpić.” Był to tekst na użytek wewnątrz Polski. Inaczej pisano w Izraelu i w USA, gdzie media podały, że w imieniu państwa polskiego, prezydent Polski, wyraził wobec wszystkich Żydów na świecie przeprosiny i skruchę. W liście do mnie pani Condoleezza Rice, działająca w rządzie USA zgodnie z życzeniami lobby Izraela, dała dowód swojego posłuszeństwa wobec radykalnych Żydów, kiedy napisała w tym liście, że jakoby „prezydent Kwaśniewski zachował się w Jedwabnem w sposób godny naśladowania.”

Perfidny Kwaśniewski prawdopodobnie znał fakt, że zbrodnie w Jedwabnem, były dokonane przez „sonder komando” z Ciechanowa, pod dowództwem Hauptsturmfuerer’a Hermann’a Schaper’a, który był skazany po wojnie w Niemczech, na sześć lat więzienia za tą zbrodnię, w dokonaniu której, Niemcy użyli około 400 litrów benzyny, do podpalenia zarekwirowanej stodoły i zastrzelili Żydów, którzy nieśli części rozbitego betonowego pomnika Lenina. Jak wiadomo wówczas Polacy w Jedwabnem nie mieli ani benzyny ani broni palnej, których posiadanie było zabronione pod karą śmierci.

Szerko głoszona fałszywa propaganda, krytykowana przez profesora Mac Donalda mówi „że Żydzi bolszewicy nie identyfikowali się z Żydami.” Bogaci bankierzy żydowscy w Nowym Jorku finansowali rewolucję bolszewicką i byli dumni z nieproporcjonalnie wielkiej ilości Żydów w rosyjskim ruchu rewolucyjnym. Mówił o tym z dumą Jacob Schiff (Jacob Hirsch Schiff ,1847-1920), bankier nowojorski, wspólnik rodziny W. Averell’a Harrimana, który był mistrzem ceremonii na konferencji w Teheranie w 1943 roku, gdzie alianci dokonali zdrady Polski.

Schiff jako prezes banku Kuhn, Loeb & Co. dał Leonowi Trockiemu 20 milionów dolarów w złocie, na bolszewicki pucz w St. Persburgu w 1917 roku. Później rząd Lenina zwrócił temu bankowi pięciokrotnie w złocie, 100 milionów dolarów, w nagrodę za pieniądze otrzymane, na opłatę zorganizowanych band zbrodniarzy w celu dokonania puczu bolszewickiego w St. Petersburgu.

Obecnie, ponad 90 lat po puczu bolszewickim i po upadku Związku Sowieckiego, Polacy są w nienawiści Żydów na drugim miejscu po Palestyńczykach, których Żydzi traktują tak jak Niemcy traktowali Żydów w czasie wojny, chociaż nie używają komór gazowych. Od czasu powstania państwa Izrael jest kolej na szczególną żydowską nienawiść do Palestyńczyków, w nieludzki sposób traktowanych w czasie tworzenia państwa Izrael i jego starań osiągnięcia „hegemonii od rzeki Nil w Egipcie do rzeki Eufrat w Iraku.”

Organizacja charytatywna Interpal, fałszywie oskarżana przez Żydów o terroryzm, działa na terenie Palestyny i stara się ratować Arabów nieludzko traktowanych przez ekstremistów żydowskich, rządzących w Izraelu. Interpal zbiera fundusze na służbę zdrowia i szkoły na terenach palestyńskich. Tymczasem na terenach Palestyny, okupowanych przez armię Izraela, Żydzi zbudowali wielki „mur hańby” czyli ścianę getta arabskiego i uruchomili 500 rogatek, które paraliżują poruszanie się Palestyńczyków, oraz zbudowali nielegalne osiedla dla ponad 400,000 nielegalnych osadników.

Obecnie miliony Palestyńczyków żyją na wygnaniu i państwo Izrael absolutnie nie zgadza się na wypłatę jakichkolwiek odszkodowań za zbrodnie popełnione przez Żydów na Arabach, jak również za stałe gwałcenie prawa międzynarodowego i rezolucji ONZ, potępiających bezprawie i masowe morderstwa dokonywane na Palestyńczykach, takie jakie z początkiem roku 2009 miały miejsce na terenie Gazy, prawie do chwili przejęcia władzy w USA przez prezydenta Barack’a Hussein’a Obamę.

Tymczasem fałszywa propaganda żydowskiego ruch roszczeniowego i jednoczesne ukrywanie masowych zbrodni żydowskich w ramach terroru komunistycznego, doprowadziło do takiego stanu rzeczy, że o ile zbrodniarzy hitlerowskich postawiono pod sąd, o tyle zbrodniarzy- komunistów przed żadnym sądem nie postawiono. Powszechnie wiadomo, że stało się tak z powodu wielkiego udziału Żydów, w kolosalnych zbrodniach epoki komunizmu. Ten stan rzeczy utrwala w Polsce, między innymi Gazeta Wyborcza, książki J.T. Gross’a oraz publikacje Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego.

Dziesięć lat przez zbrodniami Hitlera, w czasie narzucania kolektywizacji, Żydzi pod wodzą Lazara Kaganowicza, wymordowali głodem dwa razy więcej chłopów w Sowietach, niż Hitler wymordował Żydów dziesięć lat później. Wówczas Żydzi chwalili się w Kijowie, w czasie narzuconego „głodomoru,” że w stolicy Ukrainy, żaden Żyd nie był głodny.

Profesor Norman Finkelstein opisuje szczegółowo w swoich książkach, że sedno samo-zakłamania Żydów uformowane zostało w latach 1945-1967, kiedy skończył się okres żywej pamięci zbrodni, popełnianych przez Żydów, od 1939 roku współpracujących z sowieckim aparatem terroru na polskich terenach.

W 1967 roku zaczął się trwający do dziś okres skutecznego narzucania zakłamanej propagandy i ostrej cenzury, tak, że obecnie, mało kto, zdaje sobie sprawę, że w dwudziestym wieku, żydowskie ofiary stanowiły mniej niż 3% dwustu szesnastu milionów ofiar masowych mordów popełnionych w tym największym „wieku śmierci” w historii ludzkości. Tymczasem Żydzi szerzą propagandę „antygoizmu,” w ramach którego „antypolonizm” odgrywa ważną rolę.

Dwukrotna zdrada Polski przez Londyn dotyczyła machinacji brytyjskich w sprawie wschodnich granic Polski. Propozycje angielskie nazwano „linią Curzona” tak jak również nazywano „linią Curzona” granicę między Afganistanem i Pakistanem. Lord Curzon nie wiele miał do czynienia ze sprawą polskich granic, ale pozostawił po sobie powiedzenie, że od tysięcy lat „Afganistan jest cmentarzem imperiów.” Nigdy w rzeczywistości Linia Curzona nie była granicą polski, ale pochodziła od Dawida Lloyd George’a, który był premierem brytyjskim (1916-1922) szkodliwym dla sprawy polskiej, ponieważ uważał Polskę za sojusznika Francji, konkurenta W. Brytanii.

Pierwszej zdrady Polski dokonał Lloyd George 12 lipca 1920 roku, w czasie ofensywy sowieckiej na Warszawę. Wówczas sfałszował on granicę proponowaną rządowi Lenina przez konferencję ambasadorów państw alianckich 11go lipca 1920go roku. Lloyd George uczynił to przy pomocy Żyda z Polski, agenta wywiadu brytyjskiego, który póżniej był działaczem syjonistycznym i profesorem historii w Anglii, pod nazwiskiem Lewis Bernstein Namier (1888-1960), byłym studentem uniwersytetu lwowskiego.

Namier ogłaszał się jako „ofiara antysemityzmu” Romana Dmowskiego, kiedy pracował w „politycznym wywiadzie” angielskim i pomagał Lloyd George’owi zniszczyć plan Dmowskiego, który w imieniu Polski, na konferencji pokojowej w Paryżu, żądał przyłączenia do Polski Prus Wschodnich, z wyjątkiem wolnego miasta Królewca.

Namier pomagał Lloyd George’owi przeforsować na miejsce wolnego miasta Królewca, wolne miasto Gdańsk. Wówczas naczelny wódz sił zbrojnych Francji, marszałek Ferdynand Foche, wskazał na Gdańsk i powiedział, że „Tu zacznie się Druga Wojna Światowa.

Namier służył jako polityczny sekretarz Żydowskiej Agencji w Palestynie (1929-31) do czasu, kiedy „nawrócił się” na protestantyzm, żeby ożenić się z Angielką. Namier zawsze popierał zakulisowe wpływy finansowej elity żydowskiej (grubby self-interested elite) i w tym celu manipulował faktami historycznymi, za co był ostro krytykowany przez sir Herbert’a Butterfield’a.

Obecnie Ukraińcy wychowani jeszcze przez Austryjaków, jako narzędzie ich anty-polskiej polityki” „divide et impera,” w tak zwanej przez Austrię Galicji, obecnie nazywają polskie wschodnie tereny przygraniczne, jako „Zakurzonię” na pamiątkę nazwy „Curzone Line” proponowanej w czasie ofensywy bolszewickiej na Warszawę w 1920 roku.

Churchill, syn Żydówki, był znacznie ważniejszym syjonistą od Namiera i jego zdrada dokonana wobec Polski przy pomocy prezydenta Roosevelt’a, była porównania bardziej szkodliwa dla Polaków w latach 1943-1945, niż Linia Curzon’a proponowana przez Lloyd George’a była w 1920 roku. Wówczas główną stratą Polski było brytyjskie odrzucenie żądań Dmowskiego, żeby przyłączyć do Polski Prusy Wschodnie i uczynić z Królewca zamiast z Gdańska „wolne miasto.”

Naturalnie w pertraktacjach z Zachodem, Stalin powoływał się na propozycję Lloyd George’a, w formie tak zwanej „Linii Curzona” z 1920 roku i było rzeczą prostą dla anty-polskiego i pro-sowieckiego Roosevelt’a, żeby przyjąć za oczywiste, żeby Lwów wraz z całym województwem lwowskim znalazł się po sowieckiej stronie w 1945 roku.

Generał Władysław Anders opisał w książce „Bez ostatniego rozdziału,” jak Churchill zdradził Polskę i powiedział mu: „Pan nie jest zadowolony z konferencji jałtańskiej.” Na co generał Anders odpowiedział: „Mało powiedzieć, że nie jestem zadowolony. Uważam, że stało się wielkie nieszczęście. Na takie załatwienie sprawy naród polski nie zasłużył i my walczący tutaj nie mogliśmy tego oczekiwać. Polska pierwsza krwawiła w tej wojnie i poniosła ogromne straty. Była sojuszniczką Wielkiej Brytanii od początku i w najcięższych dla niej chwilach. Na obczyźnie zdobyliśmy się na największy wysiłek, na jaki stać było żołnierza, w powietrzu, na morzu i lądzie. W Kraju zorganizowaliśmy największy podziemny ruch oporu przeciw Niemcom. Żołnierz walczył o Polskę, walczył o wolność swego narodu. Co dzisiaj my, dowódcy, mamy powiedzieć żołnierzowi? Rosja Sowiecka, która do r. 1941 była w ścisłym sojuszu z Niemcami, zabiera nam obecnie połowę naszego terytorium, a w pozostałej części Polski chce ustanowić swoje rządy. Wiemy z doświadczenia, do czego to zmierza.

Typowa była gwałtowna odpowiedź Churchill’a: „Wy sami jesteście temu winni. Już od dawna namawiałem was do załatwienia sprawy granic z Rosją Sowiecką i oddania jej ziem na wschód od linii Curzona. Gdybyście mnie posłuchali, dzisiaj cała sprawa wyglądałaby inaczej. Myśmy wschodnich granic Polski nigdy nie gwarantowali. Mamy dzisiaj dosyć wojska i waszej pomocy nie potrzebujemy. Może pan swoje dywizje zabrać. Obejdziemy się bez nich…”

Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Born Sept. 3, 1921
Lwów, Poland

Protestant fundamentalism originated among Anglo-Saxons because of the obligation, introduced several centuries ago in Protestant (Calvinist) sects in Britain to read the Old Testament. This resulted in judaizing of British culture, which made Britain vulnerable to the influence of Jewish extremists based on the principles of the Talmud.

The Talmud teaches that Jews are not obligated to treat non-Jews in accordance with the Ten Commandments and refers to the non-Jews (Goims) as cattle. On the other hand there, there have always been Jewish writers and thinkers, such as Israel Shahak, who openly condemned the views presented in the Talmud and saw in them the source of many misfortunes. However, radical Zionists, ruling today in Israel, apply Talmudic precepts in relation to Arabs and Persians.

Jeff’a Sharlet’s, book „The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power” (Harper Collin, 2008, ISBN: 00605597 990), describes the heretical Christian point of view held by the elite cult of the richest Protestant fundamentalists in the US. The Cult glorifies wealth and power while it cultivates contempt for for compassion and mercy.

Reviewers claim that this book is very thoroughly documented and proves that a conspiracy of millionaires and billionaires among fundamentalist in the US is fighting to take over the world. They consider themselves “chosen” by God, as proven by their personal wealth, as result of divine grace and reward for belonging to their sect. Among them are many congressmen, generals, and government officials controlled by “The Family,” both in the United States and
In the so called “banana republics,” dominated by the US.

The author, Jeff Sarlet is so far the only journalist who succeeded in documenting the activities of the hidden elite, headquartered in Arlington, on the outskirts of Washington DC, “The Family,” at the core of American fundamentalist Protestant power, was originally created along the lines of European fascism in 1935 by Abraham Vereide, who organized the wealthy internationalist elite.

This secret “Family” elite is prospering today. Is most public activity is the annual White House – Congressional “Preayer Breakfest” innagurated during the administration of President Eisenhower, in the 1950’s. Central to the group faith are belief in the “biblical capitaliusm,” U.S. military power, and global domination by the U.S. Many operational principles are derived by studying thew methods of Lenin, Hitler, and Mao, to be applied in the name of peace in the subordination of the governments or through “regime change.”

Sharlet documents how far this secret elite deviates from the generally accepted view of Protestant fundamentalism and shows how influential it has been in the “war against terror” and earlier in the “Cold War” as well as in the “free enterprise” neo-colonial globalization. Sharlet writes that instead of asking what secret elite wants, one should inquire into what they already have done.

As Sharlet describes it, this elite treats Jesus as a kind of managing director, lobbyist, and even fascist leader. They have had an enormous impact on the beliefs of Americans in the 20th century and on U.S. imperialist policy in the 21st century, through their secret machinations which have been unsuspected by most Americans.

Practically unknown elite of Protestant fundamentalist heretics controls American nuclear arsenal and is mainly motivated by the desire to accumulate personal wealth to the greatest extent possible. One byproduct of their beliefs is a contempt for the historical view of Christianity as a religion of mercy, compassion and concern for the less fortunate. Ironically, according to Sharlet, this elite views the U.S. as having been created as a “Christian nation.” In general they make efforts to avoid clashing with Talmudic radical Zionists in the pursuit of mutually agreeable goals.

Thanks to Sharlet’s book, for the first time, American public gain insight into how an economic and political elite is able to direct U.S. policy in spite of denying the most fundamental Christian principles while considering itself a Christian organization. Their heresy elevates selfishness and lust for dominance to the level of Christian virtue.

Protestant fundamentalism originated among Anglo-Saxons because of the obligation, introduced several centuries ago in Protestant (Calvinist) sects in Britain to read the Old Testament. This resulted in judaizing of British culture, which made Britain vulnerable to the influence of Jewish extremists based on the principles of the Talmud.

The Talmud teaches that Jews are not obligated to treat non-Jews in accordance with the Ten Commandments and refers to the non-Jews (Goims) as cattle. On the other hand there, there have always been Jewish writers and thinkers, such as Israel Shahak, who openly condemned the views presented in the Talmud and saw in them the source of many misfortunes. However, radical Zionists, ruling today in Israel, apply Talmudic precepts in relation to Arabs and Persians.

Jeff’a Sharlet’s, book „The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power” (Harper Collin, 2008, ISBN: 00605597 990), describes the heretical Christian point of view held by the elite cult of the richest Protestant fundamentalists in the US. The Cult glorifies wealth and power while it cultivates contempt for for compassion and mercy.

Reviewers claim that this book is very thoroughly documented and proves that a conspiracy of millionaires and billionaires among fundamentalist in the US is fighting to take over the world. They consider themselves “chosen” by God, as proven by their personal wealth, as result of divine grace and reward for belonging to their sect. Among them are many congressmen, generals, and government officials controlled by “The Family,” both in the United States and
In the so called “banana republics,” dominated by the US.

The author, Jeff Sarlet is so far the only journalist who succeeded in documenting the activities of the hidden elite, headquartered in Arlington, on the outskirts of Washington DC, “The Family,” at the core of American fundamentalist Protestant power, was originally created along the lines of European fascism in 1935 by Abraham Vereide, who organized the wealthy internationalist elite.

This secret “Family” elite is prospering today. Is most public activity is the annual White House – Congressional “Preayer Breakfest” innagurated during the administration of President Eisenhower, in the 1950’s. Central to the group faith are belief in the “biblical capitaliusm,” U.S. military power, and global domination by the U.S. Many operational principles are derived by studying thew methods of Lenin, Hitler, and Mao, to be applied in the name of peace in the subordination of the governments or through “regime change.”

Sharlet documents how far this secret elite deviates from the generally accepted view of Protestant fundamentalism and shows how influential it has been in the “war against terror” and earlier in the “Cold War” as well as in the “free enterprise” neo-colonial globalization. Sharlet writes that instead of asking what secret elite wants, one should inquire into what they already have done.

As Sharlet describes it, this elite treats Jesus as a kind of managing director, lobbyist, and even fascist leader. They have had an enormous impact on the beliefs of Americans in the 20th century and on U.S. imperialist policy in the 21st century, through their secret machinations which have been unsuspected by most Americans.

Practically unknown elite of Protestant fundamentalist heretics controls American nuclear arsenal and is mainly motivated by the desire to accumulate personal wealth to the greatest extent possible. One byproduct of their beliefs is a contempt for the historical view of Christianity as a religion of mercy, compassion and concern for the less fortunate. Ironically, according to Sharlet, this elite views the U.S. as having been created as a “Christian nation.” In general they make efforts to avoid clashing with Talmudic radical Zionists in the pursuit of mutually agreeable goals.

Thanks to Sharlet’s book, for the first time, American public gain insight into how an economic and political elite is able to direct U.S. policy in spite of denying the most fundamental Christian principles while considering itself a Christian organization. Their heresy elevates selfishness and lust for dominance to the level of Christian virtue.

Solomon Morel, 86, was commandant of a death camp at Swietochlowice, Poland after World War II. The camp’s population included many innocent Polish men, women, and children of German descent whose homes, businesses and belongings had been seized by Jewish communist authorities. The victims were then herded into numerous concentration camps, one at Swietochlowice.

Solomon Morel, barbaric torturer now hiding out in Israel.

Poland is demanding that Israel extradite for trial a Jewish man accused of brutal tortures and mass killings in a Soviet concentration camp.

Solomon Morel, 86, was commandant of a death camp at Swietochlowice, Poland after World War II. The camp’s population included many innocent Polish men, women, and children of German descent whose homes, businesses and belongings had been seized by Jewish communist authorities. The victims were then herded into numerous concentration camps, one at Swietochlowice.

Morel was indicted in 1994 by a Polish court and ordered to face charges of “crimes against humanity.” Among the crimes the Jewish commandant allegedly committed: murders by bashing the heads of babies against stone walls; bludgeoning inmates to death with stools and clubs; inflicting extreme pain by forcing objects up inmates’ anus; forcing women and children to parade around nude in subfreezing temperatures; making inmates eat human feces; and starving people to death.

Upon his indictment, Solomon Morel, assisted by the Israeli government, fled to Tel Aviv, Israel where he has been hiding out. American television’s 60 Minutes program tracked him down and located Morel in that city. His whereabouts are known to the Israeli authorities.

Up to 80,000 people are believed to have died as a result of torture, deprivation, and starvation in post-World War II concentration camps, all of which were headed by Jewish commandants.

According to a report in London’s The Telegraph, newspaper (January 2, 2005) and in John Sack’s investigative book, An Eye for An Eye, “Stalin deliberately picked Jews as camp commandants in the knowledge they would show little mercy to the inmates.”

The Polish public prosecutor leading the Morel case, Eva Kok, insisted that the claims could not be “swept under the carpet.” She added: “The Israelis are extremely efficient in pursuing people they have accused of such crimes—and they must accept that other nations want to do the same.”

Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Comments on Jan Tomasz Gross’s
Ghastly Decade 1939-1948

Copyright @ 1998 by Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
All rights reserved.

The matters related to compensation for Poles and Jews for damages suffered under Nazi and Soviet occupation.

Reuters Agency reported from Buenos Aires, Argentina on Fri, 19 Apr 1996 (14:50:17 PDT) on The World Jewish Congress.

Israel Singer, General Secretary of the World Jewish Congress stated that “More than three million Jews died in Poland and the Polish people are not going to be the heirs of the Polish Jews. We are never going to allow this. (…) They’re gonna hear from us until Poland freezes over again. If Poland does not satisfy Jewish claims it will be “publicly attacked and humiliated” in the international forum.

Today some Jews are estimating the value of Jewish assets lost in Poland and vicinity in the billions of dollars. Descendants of the Holocaust victims obviously could not hope to extract billions of dollars from descendants of the Polish gentile victims of war. Aware of these difficulties, some Jews have promoted a myth about Polish complicity in the Holocaust. Obviously it would be easier to extract money from descendants of the guilty rather than descendants of innocent co-victims whose property was also destroyed or eventually, in many cases, taken from them by the Soviet puppet government.

Jan Tomasz Gross wrote three essays in the spirit of this kind of myth. They were published in Krakw in 1998 by Universitas under the title of “Upiorna Dekada, 1939-1948. (Ghastly Decade 1939-1948).” On 118 small-size pages the author accuses the Polish nation of complicity in the Holocaust and in eviction of the Jews. This propaganda effort is surprising, coming from a writer of serious works.

A symbolic buzzard eating dead flesh is shown on the cover the Ghastly Decade 1939-1948. It resembles communist propaganda posters, especially the famous “spit-soiled dwarf of reaction of 1945.” The decade “1939-1948″ does not represent any distinct period in Polish history. It does, however, include the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany and the exodus of Jews from Eastern and Central Europe. It was forced by pogroms staged by the Soviets in all satellite states. The exodus was made possible by opening the Iron Curtain for hundreds of thousands of Jews. The notion that these people were not fit to live under communism is patently wrong. Millions of those “unfit to live under communism” perished in the “Gulag Archipelago.” Only Jews had the privilege to emigrate en masse from the Soviet Bloc because Stalin had other plans for them. The Polish nation had no complicity in these events.

Stalin exploited the Zionist movement in order to abolish the British Mandate in Palestine. In the process he created a window of opportunity, to use the words of Paul Johnson, for establishing the State of Israel. Stalin’s purpose was to embitter the conflict between Arabs and Jews and to blockade the supplies of Arab oil to the West. He also helped to inflame the hatred of the Muslim world against the United States. Stalin’s strategy worked and deadly terrorism of Islamic fundamentalists is growing long after the Soviet dictator is gone.

Gross falsifies quotations in order to make his points. On page 56 he changes the meaning of a quote in the diary of dr. Zygmunt Klukowski (Dziennik z lat okupacji Zamojszczyzny – A diary of the years of occupation of Zamojszczyzna). Gross insinuates that in October 1942 Poles murdered some 2300 Jews while the Germans deported for execution 934 other victims. The deception is achieved by omission of quotation marks (“nasi”); this changed the meaning of a crucial statement of the original diary, in which reference was made to locally stationed German gendarmes.
Self defense and national identity under the occupation.

The ethnic Poles considered German and Soviet invaders as equally dangerous whereas many Jews were trying to find security on the Soviet side. The ethnic Poles were naturally preoccupied with saving their nation, which was exposed to massive executions starting two years before the Holocaust. From the beginning of the war, the Germans were committing mass murders on the Polish civilian population, especially throughout western Poland, newly annexed by Germany. They brought with them lists of victims prepared long before the invasion of Poland. The Soviet NKVD prepared a list of 21,857 people of the Polish leadership community all of whom were executed during the Spring of 1940. Mass execution of the Jews in German gas chambers began two years later.

The Polish resistance movement was the largest in occupied Europe. In order to break the Polish resistance Nazi-German terror apparatus (1939-1945) and the communist security forces (1939-1956) tortured more gentile Poles than any other European ethnic group.

Gross does not recognize the fact that helping Jews was a part of the resistance against the Nazis. Illogically he cites the fact that more Poles were engaged in the armed resistance than in saving of the Jews as a proof of Polish anti-Semitism.

In order the understand the desperate struggle of the Poles in the face of the greatest catastrophe in the Polish history and the general disinterest of the Polish Jews in the fate of the Polish state one can quote statements by the Nobel Prize laureate Isaac Bashevis Singer (1904-1991) in New York’s Forverts of Sept. 17, 1944. Writing under the pen-name Iccok Warszawski under the title “Jews and Poles Lived Together For 800 Years But Were Not Integrated” he stated:

“Rarely did a Jew think it necessary to learn Polish, rarely was a Jew interested in Polish history or politics. (…) Even in the last few years it was still a rare occurrence that a Jew would speak Polish well. Out of three million Jews living in Poland, two and half million were not able to write a simple letter in Polish and they spoke [Polish] very poorly. There were hundreds of thousands of Jews in Poland to whom Polish was as unfamiliar as Turkish.” In the same paper he wrote on March 20. 1964: “My mouth could not get accustomed to the soft consonants of [Polish] language. My forefathers have lived for centuries in Poland but in reality I was a foreigner, with separate language, ideas and religion. I sensed the oddness of this situation and often considered moving to Palestine.” (The above quotations are from Chone Shmeruk’s Isaac Bashevis Singer and Bruno Schultz published in the Polish Review Vol. XXXVI, 1991, pp.: 161-167.) Bashevis Singer suggests that Jews in Poland were a self-segregated ethnic or national group which could not pass as ethnic Poles.
Death penalty for helping Jews was unique to Poland.

The essence of the policies of the Nazi government at all times was the implementation of the doctrine of the Lebensraum, or German “living space.” The aim of the Berlin government was to seize Slavic lands and replace the Slavic population with what they considered “racial Germans.” Thus, Poland was to be colonized by Germans and the Polish nation eradicated. For this reason the Nazi-Germans used every opportunity to kill Poles. One of the examples of this policy was the death penalty and immediate execution of entire Polish families and neighborhoods for helping Jews. At the same time, for example, in Denmark, which the Germans did not intend to colonize, no one was executed for helping any of the few Jews who lived there.

Gross disregards these facts and on the page 41 he gives the following illogical title to a chapter:

On the fact that the prevailing Polish anti-Semitism also was the reason why the Poles who helped Jews were brutally and totally murdered by the Germans.

Then on page 60 Gross writes “how was it that the people who sheltered Jews during the war, did not like to admit it after the war. (…) It was believed that anyone helping Jews got rich” and therefore could be robbed or repressed for “breaking the local code of behavior.” Gross does not mention the fact that it often was difficult to admit to one’s neighbor that by sheltering a Jew one was risking one’s neighbor’s life without his knowledge – it was easier not to tell one’s neighbor about the “time bomb” next door and therefore not to celebrate the fact that it did not explode.

One could consider how much more Polish gentiles could have done to avert the tragic fate of the Jews in a situation where Polish gentiles could not prevent the killing of millions of Polish Christians and when the Polish Nation itself faced genocide. It is difficult to find a Polish gentile family which did not experience the loss of close relatives under the German and Soviet occupations. In central Poland, which the Germans turned into killing fields called by them a General Protectorate, there were eleven million Polish gentiles and two million Polish Jews. They were separated by the cultural barrier described by Bashevis Singer. Thus, for each Polish family there was one Jew that desperately needed help. The presence of the prewar German minority and of “racial Germans,” recruited locally by the Nazis, further complicated the struggle for survival of both Polish gentiles and Jews.

Also important was the Soviet policy to nominate Jews to very visible posts in the Communist terror apparatus in order to shift the blame to the Jews for Soviet crimes. This perfidious Soviet policy did not facilitate a postwar admission that one risked one’s and others’ lives while sheltering the very people who later became Soviet executioners in Poland. Widespread Jewish complicity in the Soviet terror apparatus installed in Poland speaks volumes about their lack of concern for the existence of a sovereign Polish nation.
Arab oil versus the pogrom in Kielce.

Stalin signed in Yalta a pledge to hold free elections in Poland. The Soviets broke this pledge and used various propaganda means to draw the Allies’ attention away from this fact. They exploited the horrible Jewish tragedy, about which the world was beginning to learn the gruesome details. The Soviets used the accusation of Polish anti-Semitism to justify their protracted occupation of Poland, while at the same time the NKVD staged pogroms in all satellite states, in particular in Poland.

19th century ritual murder accusations of the Black Hundred and the Tsarist Okhrana were recycled by the Soviets. Of the many pogroms in 1945 and 1946 only the Kielce pogrom of July 4, 1945 was exploited worldwide by the Soviet propaganda. The pogroms in Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Czechia, and eastern Galicia as well as the Kielce pogrom was conducted under close control of the NKVD in order to generate an exodus of Jews who otherwise would not emigrate.

The American Ambassador to Poland was convinced the date of the 4th of July was chosen for an efficient dissemination of news among the American Jewry on the anniversary of the American Independence, a day free of work (Arthus Bliss-Lane, I Saw Poland Betrayed, New York, 1948). A month later a bloody pogrom was staged in Bratislava, Slovakia, where participants of a veterans’ convention were ordered to march to Jewish quarters where they committed crimes similar to those in Kielce. Needless to say, Gross treats the Kielce events as a genuine proof of Polish anti-Semitism.

On the fiftieth anniversary of the Kielce pogrom, the post-communists exerted much effort trying to whitewash the NKVD and UB which engineered and controlled the pogrom, while blaming it on Polish mob. It bears repeating, however, that innocent people were tortured and executed within a week after the pogrom, after a show trial which lasted a few days. The strength of the post-communist grip on Poland makes the correction of these mendacities difficult.

I have personally discussed the Kielce events with Israeli Judge Mrs. Sara Dotan. She was assigned to supervise in 1996 in Tel-Aviv the deposition of Israeli survivors of Kielce pogrom for a report prepared by post-communist investigators Zbigniew Mielecki and others. Judge Dotan stated that she was severely shocked to learn from the witnesses that the Kielce murders were committed by soldiers and Catholic priests.

I have tried to explain to her that apparently the witnesses mistook the military shirts equipped with white neck bands for the Roman collars (which were not worn by Polish priests in 1946). Apparently some of the uniformed men from the Soviet terror apparatus in Poland (such as soldiers from the Blocking Companies of the Second Infantry Division stationed in Kielce, soldiers from the Internal Corps as well as the uniformed riot police) were assigned to stage the pogrom. Apparently, they were given civilian coats and pants to feign a role of a Polish mob. By wearing the regular military shirts they appeared to the Israeli witnesses as having had the Roman collars now popular among the clergy visiting the Holy Land.

The tragic events known as the Pogrom of Kielce of 1946 were demonstrably a part of Soviet postwar global strategy. The Soviets ruthlessly exploited Jews for Soviet political purposes.

In New York on July 7, 1946 the Society For The Promotion Of Poland’s Independence issued a Declaration On the Kielce Crime. The declaration was signed by prominent historians Henryk Askenazy, Oskar Halecki and others. It stated:

(…)The Warsaw regime receiving its orders from Moscow and acting strictly in obedience to them has (…) [pursued] policies planned methodically and aimed at compelling the Jews to leave Poland and to embarrass the British Government in matters pertaining to the Palestine problem, and, furthermore, to aggravate the political crisis in the Near East, to envenom Judeo-Arab antagonisms. It is indeed for that purpose that the Warsaw regime endeavors to squeeze in the remnants of Poland’s Jewish population which has succeeded in escaping Hitler’s massacre, into American and British zones of occupation of Germany.”

Soviet attempts to destabilize the oil-rich Near East also included the opening of the Iron Curtain to allow hundreds of thousands of Jews, many of whom went to Palestine, to join the struggle for the independence of Israel. The emigrating Jews were armed with Czech weapons given to them by the Soviets. Bernard Lewis (Semites and Anti-Semites. New York: W.W. Norton 1986) states that the Soviet Bloc was the only source of weapons used by the Jews during the decisive struggles in Palestine. In the Spring of 1947 Andrei Gromyko was the first to propose in the UN the establishing of the State of Israel. Decisive moves by the USSR in the UN on the recognition of the State of Israel were a part of the strategy to make Islamic owners of the Near East oil fields dependent on Soviet weapons and political support. Soviet aim was to blockade the supply of Arab oil to the United States and its allies as well as to generate fanatical hatred of the Muslim world against the West.
Crime during catastrophic events

One can endlessly cite criminal acts and moral failures inside Ghetto walls and outside of them. The courts of the Polish Home Army (AK) associated with the Polish Government-in-Exile in London condemned to death and executed traitors and criminals. All over the world cataclysms offer an opportunity for people to act on their worst instincts.

In the United States it is a standard procedure to call on the national guard to protect the population against widespread looting and crime during catastrophic events. No one in America considers such crimes to be a national disgrace. Anti-Polish propaganda practiced by Gross and others like him demands that the Polish Nation accept the behavior of individual criminals to be sins of all Poles.
The Holocaust Museums

Gross quotes Jzef Lipi ski, the famous professor of economics, who wrote Two homelands (“Dwie Ojczyzny”) “anti-Polonism is as bad as anti-Semitism or as anti-Ukrainism,” and then goes on to criticize Poland for not copying American museums of the Holocaust. These museums practice anti-Polonism and spread the myth about Polish complicity in the Holocaust. Large exhibits of the 1946 Pogrom of Kielce are shown as the Polish phase of the genocide of the Jews.

There is nothing in the Holocaust Museums on the German megalomaniac interpretation of the theory of evolution which says that life is a mortal struggle for the survival of the fittest. The Germanic race was supposed to be the fittest, as opposed to Semitic and Slavic races. Marx strengthened the confusion when he came up with his theory of history according to which the law of the jungle was justified in the political struggle between nations or social classes.

The Holocaust Museums do not show how Marx and Darwin provided fertile ground for the development of anti-Semitism which percolated in German society throughout the second half of the nineteenth century, as German racism and the ideals of German superiority gained ground. At the same time Wagner’s operas were strengthening German megalomania, Nietzsche’s dream of supermanhood pleased the Germans. While Bismarck’s regime toned down anti-Semitism, it directed its hatred towards Polish Catholics. Bismarck marked the Poles for destruction in order to assure Germany’s rule over Prussian territory (Werner Richter, Bismarck, New York: Putnam Press, 1964. p. 101). While Bismarck’s anti-Catholic campaign was being conducted in parts of Poland occupied by Germany, mixed Christian-Jewish marriages were occurring quite often among the Germans. The children of those marriages were thaught to say that they were totally and unconditionally German. But anti-Semitism kept growing, sustained among other reasons by a resentful realization that Jews played a prominent role in German society.
Forcing of Jews to be executioners both in ghettos and death camps.

The Holocaust Museums should show how the racist sentiments were at the root of the opinion that German defeat in 1918 was due to Jews and how anti-Semitism became the rallying force for politicians and demagogues in the Weimar Republic. In this atmosphere, the descendants of mixed Jewish-German marriages leaned over backward to prove that their loyalties lay with Germany rather than with Jewry. Therefore when Hitler came to power, many members of such families volunteered for the job of solving the Jewish question. Among such people were von Heydrich, Globocnik, Eichman, Knochenn, Dannecker and many others. These people represented a “pathological Jewish self-hatred,” to use the words of a Jewish historian Gerald Reitlinger (SS-Alibi of a Nation 1922-1945, Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1951 & 1981). In particular, Reitlinger points out that when SS General Reinhard von Heydrich became responsible for the program of extermination of the Jews, he arranged it so that the Jews themselves were forced to be executioners of Jews both in ghettos and death camps.

As a result an average Jewish policeman in the Warsaw Ghetto dispatched over 2,200 persons to the gas chambers of Treblinka. At the Umschlagplatz in Warsaw, where Jews were loaded into trains going to Treblinka, Jewish policemen offered food in the railway carriages to entice hungry inhabitants of the ghetto to enter. The most horrible dimension of the Jewish tragedy in World War II was that German planners made the Jews themselves execute the Jewish genocide. The abominable activities of the extortionists (szmalcowniki), or gentiles who collaborated with the Nazis as “racial Germans” (the volksdeutsche) or other collaborators, were of marginal importance in the genocide of Polish Jews. The real destruction was done with active participation of Jewish Councils and Jewish Police. This aspect of the Jewish tragedy has been carefully hidden in the US Holocaust Museum, which instead prominently features such “Polish” elements as the Kielce pogrom.
Reconciliation versus tradition

Traditional Jewish animosity toward the Poles developed during the partitions of Poland. It was much more common than Jewish hatred of the Germans. This was mentioned by Polish Catholic writer Zofia Kossak-Szczucka during the Holocaust when she was appealing for sacrifices of Polish gentiles for the cause of saving Jews within the egota program financed by Polish Government-in-Exile in London.

Today the Jewish attitude toward Poles manifests itself in the use of generalizations when dealing with accusations. Jewish students are often thaught that the Holocaust would not have taken place if the Poles did not want it. To teach about the Holocaust an animal farm rendition of the genocide of the Jews is used showing Jews as mice, Germans as cats, and Poles as swine (Maus by Art Spiegelman). Some of the colleges in America include this new version of the animal farm as an obligatory reading. If ever this cartoon rendition of the Holocaust is translated into Polish and published in Poland it will offend many who remember how the Nazis referred to the Poles as swine.

In the conclusion of his Ghastly Decade Gross equates Polish anti-Semitism with Hitlerism in Germany, Stalinism in Russia, and legally- sanctioned slavery and racism in the United States. These comparisons are highly unfair. Anti-Semitism never was legally sanctioned in free Poland. When Poland was a Soviet satellite the Warsaw regime carried out Moscow’s orders whether in Kielce, or in 1968, or at any other time during the entire history of Peoples’ Poland.

Gross writes: The Poles – because of the Holocaust – must study the history of the persecution of the Jews in Poland. Otherwise they will not be able to live in harmony with their own identity. The insinuation included in this statement is in contrast with what Simon Wiesenthal wrote in Krystyna, a Tragedy of Polish Resistance: “In the Polish history, the relations between Poles and Jews never were simple.” On his eightieth birthday Wiesenthal said: I know what kind of role Jewish communists played in Poland after the war. And just as I, as a Jew, do not want to shoulder responsibility for the Jewish communists, I cannot blame 36 million Poles for those thousands of [wartime] extortionists (szmalcownicy) [common criminals].
Conclusion

The separatist Polish Jews described by Bashevis Singer are no more. Today Jews in Poland are a part of the Polish Nation and they should follow the conciliatory advice of Simon Wiesenthal

During the Second World War Poland was devastated and plundered by the Germans and the Soviets. Jewish possessions in Warsaw were devastated, together with the possessions of all inhabitants of the Polish capital. After the war the capital was rebuilt from ruins with great effort and sacrifice of the Polish people. So it was in other Polish towns. The Polish population was systematically robbed by the Germans and the Soviets. Essentially by the end of 1948 there was hardly a person in Poland, Jew or Gentile, whose property was not destroyed or taken over either by the Nazis or the Communists. All claims for restitution for damages incurred in the years 1939-1989 should be settled without regard of creed or ethnic origin.

Unfortunately, Gross, despite his scientific credentials, is practicing propaganda in the spirit of the statements made by the Secretary General of the Jewish World Congress quoted at the beginning of this text. Gross’s propaganda helps those who make demands for ransom to be paid by the Polish Government to compensate for crimes perpetrated in Poland by the Nazis, the Soviets, and by common criminals.

Page Tools
Email to a friend Printer format
An old Jewish man who took his own cold-blooded revenge against Germans for the Holocaust will not be extradited back to Poland from Israel to answer charges of genocide.

The case of Solomon Morel, 86, is the only one in Holocaust history where a Jew stands accused of war crimes against Germans.

It has perplexed legal minds in both countries. Poland says genocide is genocide whether a Jew or a Nazi committed it, while many Israelis see rough justice in the 1500 German deaths for which Mr Morel is alleged to be responsible.

Now the Israeli Government has said that Mr Morel will not be sent back to stand trial in Poland under any circumstances.

Mr Morel, who came from the little Polish town of Grabowo, claims he was an Auschwitz survivor whose family was murdered by the Nazis during World War II. A book, An Eye for an Eye, which documents his strange life, claims his family was indeed liquidated, but by Poles who collaborated with the Nazis. It also says that he was never imprisoned by the Germans.

Advertisement
AdvertisementBy 1943 he was employed peeling potatoes for a Jewish partisan brigade before escaping to the Soviet Union, where he trained in the gruesome interrogation methods of the NKVD, Stalin’s political police, before returning to Poland in 1945. He was then put in charge by the communists of a camp containing thousands of German prisoners including SS men, soldiers and civilians.

John Sack, the Jewish-American author of An Eye for an Eye, claims Mr Morel, as commandant of Swietochlowice Camp, morphed into the kind of monster that would have been welcomed by the Gestapo.

“His favourite method of killing prisoners was hacking the skull of his victims with a wooden leg of a chair,” according to the book. “It is quite possible that in Swietochlowice several thousand persons were murdered by Morel and his men.”

They would beat them and throw the bodies out of the window.”
Camp survivorSack’s book, and a score of Polish books and newspaper articles, said he beat, shot, starved, tortured and killed with gusto in the camp.

“I knew Morel in the camp. He was a very brutal man,” survivor Dorota Boriczek said. “He was young then. He would come in at night. We could hear the cries of the men then. They would beat them and throw the bodies out of the window.”

In 1989, a Polish reporter found Mr Morel living in a part of Katowice assigned for former uniformed functionaries of communist terror.

In the early 1990s, the Main Commission for the Investigations of Crimes Against the Polish Nation started an official investigation of Mr Morel’s activities in the Swietochlowice Camp after witness articles appeared in the press.

In 1994, Mr Morel sought political asylum in Sweden. This was refused. He then successfully sought sanctuary in Israel.

Poland tried to extradite him seven years ago on torture charges. Israel refused. So prosecutors began preparing a genocide case, for which there is no statute of limitations.

Last week, they received a blank refusal from Israel saying “there was no basis whatsoever” to extradite Mr Morel.

A Polish prosecutor said testimony from former inmates documented Mr Morel’s torture of at least 13 prisoners.

“There should be one measure for judging war criminals, irrespective whether they are German, Israeli, or any other nationality,” the prosecutor said.

Solomon Morel was a 18 year-old in 1937, who lived with his aunt in £ódŸ, Poland. When World War Two came, he refused to serve in the Polish army. By 1942, he and his brother organized a criminal band and robbed local people.

In 1942, the Communist partisans recruited him, where he worked as a guide through the forests. Today, the Polish government want to hang him for his grave crimes.

Morel Captured

Morel claimed he was a resistance fighter, but he was known as a black marketeer, and pimped Polish girls to German soldiers.

He was arrested by the Nazis for criminal activity, and sent to Auschwitz. He claimed to have lost 39 relatives at Auschwitz.

In 1945, Morel Becomes Commandant Of Zgoda Camp

A former subcamp of Auschwitz, in 1945 the NKVD took it over and put Solomon Morel in charge.

The camp was considered one of the most cruel Stalinist crimes against the Silesian population.

The Camps

They didn’t arrest war criminals, but mainly civilians. The communist Jews emptied local villages of their German leaders and sent them there.

The Russian Bolsheviks Killed Everyone

If a gentile owned a business, he would be arrested, and sent to Morel. A local Jew would then buy the business for back taxes. “His favorite method of killing prisoners was hacking the skull of his victims with a wooden leg of a chair,” according to the book. He killed thousands.

The NKVD Raped The Countryside

Morel and his band of ‘Jewish ex-partisans’ also abducted local children. Local town Jews informed on town girls, who were soon abducted. About 6,000 people were kept in the camp since it was opened.

A Lust For Young Boys

Morel used the camp as his base for drugs, prostitution, and the Bolshevik’s natural fascination with torture. He kept young boys for his personal pleasure.

German Girls raped

Jewish guards would tie young Fraulines to a post after they raped them.

The Younger The Better

These Bolshevik Jews wouldn’t hesitate to rape this child. 7

Polish Witness

“I knew Morel in the camp. He was a very brutal and sadistic man,” survivor Dorota Boriczek said. “He was young then, full of lust, I could hear the cries of the young boys during the night.”

Jews Beat Prisoners

The guards at Morel’s camp were Jewish criminals fresh out of Auschwitz, and the first thing they did was beat their old Nazis guards to death with shovels.

Even The NKVD Despised Him

In the hysteria of war they could have this vampire do their bidding, but by 1948 they wanted no part of the creature.

After The War

In 1989, a Polish reporter found Mr. Morel living in a part of Katowice assigned for former uniformed functionaries of communist terror.

Morel Is On The Run

In the early 1990s, the Main Commission for the Investigations of Crimes Against the Polish Nation started an official investigation of Mr. Morel’s activities in the Swietochlowice Camp after witness articles appeared in the press.

Flees To Israel

In 1994, Mr. Morel sought political asylum in Sweden. This was refused. He then successfully sought sanctuary in Israel.

Israel Refused Extradition

Last week, Polish authorities received a blank refusal from Israel saying “there was no basis whatsoever” to extradite Mr. Morel.

Chodzi o ważną lekcję udzieloną przez Teda Galena Carpentera, prezesa prestiżowego Cato Institute w Waszyngtonie, szefa wydziału obrony i polityki zagranicznej oraz autora ośmiu książek dotyczących stosunków międzynarodowych, prezydentowi Polski, Lechowi Kaczyńskiemu. Prezydent Kaczyński wystąpił przed kamerami telewizji TVN24, wyrażając swoje głębokie rozczarowanie z powodu upadku projektu budowy wyrzutni rakiet amerykańskich typu „Tarcza” w Polsce. Stanowisko profesora Carpentera w tej sprawie można znaleźć artykule pod tytułem The Limits of Deterrence (Granice odstraszania) z 3 września 2008 roku.

Tłem obecnej sytuacji międzynarodowej jest gwarantowane obopólne zniszczenie nuklearne Rosji i USA na wypadek konfliktu między tymi państwami. Biorąc to pod uwagę, profesor Carpenter pisze, że gwarancje bezpieczeństwa, obiecywane przez USA 50 państwom, są dokładnie tyle warte, co czeki bez pokrycia. Przypomina to gwarancje dane Polsce w 1939 roku przez Brytyjczyków i Francuzów, które nie spowodowały włączenia się tych państw w akcje przeciwko agresorowi niemieckiemu, który napadł na sojuszniczą Polskę.

Fakt, że USA mają bez porównania większą gospodarkę niż Rosja, traci znaczenie wobec równowagi siły niszczącej ich arsenałów. Poza tym ważną sprawą jest nierówny ciężar gatunkowy sprawy „Tarczy” dla USA i Rosji. Dla Stanów Zjednoczonych posiadanie rakiet w Polsce, o kilka minut lotu pocisku od Moskwy, jest atrakcyjnym manewrem strategicznym, z użyciem polskiego pionka, który można poświęcić w razie grożących mu rosyjskich bomb nuklearnych.

Natomiast dla Rosji szachowanie przez USA rakietami ustawionymi blisko rosyjskich ośrodków dowodzenia i kontroli jest czymś bez porównania bardziej nie do zaakceptowania, niż było dla USA stawianie sowieckich wyrzutni rakiet na Kubie w 1962 roku, gdzie odległość ich od Waszyngtonu była dwa razy większa, niż planowanych wyrzutni „Tarczy” w Polsce od Moskwy.

Obecną sytuację opisał Ryan Lucas z Associated Press, 8 marca 2009 roku, w artykule pod tytułem Polish President: Missile defense should go ahead; Polish President: US decision against missile defense would be unfriendly gesture. (Prezydent Polski twierdzi: należy budować w Polsce wyrzutnie rakiet Tarczy; Polski prezydent twierdzi, że decyzja USA przeciwko budowie wyrzutni rakiet Tarczy byłaby nieprzyjaznym gestem). Tego rodzaju wypowiedzi prezydenta Polski kompromitują go w oczach wszystkich ludzi, rozumiejących obecną grę strategiczną między USA i Rosją.

Prezydent Obama napisał ostatnio do prezydenta Rosji, Dymitra Miedwiediewa, że w zamian za rosyjską pomoc w ograniczaniu programu nuklearnego Iranu, gotów jest zrezygnować z budowy wyrzutni rakiet „Tarcza” w Polsce. Nie ulega najmniejszej wątpliwości, że gdyby Rosjanie zbombardowali Polskę bombami nuklearnymi z powodu potencjalnego zagrożenia Moskwy nuklearnymi pociskami „Tarczy”, Waszyngton w żadnym razie nie użyłby bomb nuklearnych przeciwko Rosji, ponieważ chodzi mu głównie o uniknięcie rosyjskiego ataku nuklearnego na teren USA. Natomiast prezydent Polski całkowicie niepotrzebnie naraża swój kraj, przy okazji zamrażając kontrakty na dostawy polskiej żywności do Rosji, z korzyścią dla innych członków NATO i UE.

Równowaga terroru nuklearnego arsenałów USA i Rosji idzie w parze z tym, jakie znaczenie ma dana sprawa dla każdej z superpotęg nuklearnych. Zachodnia Europa w czasie „zimnej wojny” miała bez porównania większe strategiczne znaczenie dla USA niż dla Sowietów i dlatego wówczas USA były gotowe obrócić Polskę w strefę zatrutą radioaktywnie za pomocą bombardowania nuklearnego, w celu zablokowania dostępu z ZSRR do Europy Zachodniej. W latach 70. XX wieku bronił Polski pułkownik Ryszard Kukliński, uniemożliwiając Sowietom przygotowanie niespodziewanego ataku na Zachód, przez przekazanie CIA kilkudziesięciu tysięcy dokumentów sztabu Paktu Warszawskiego.

Pamiętamy, jak zaciekły syjonista Winston Churchill zdradził Polskę w Teheranie w 1943 roku, a w roku 1944 powiedział Stalinowi, że losy Polski i Polaków mało go obchodzą. Chodziło mu tylko o zachowanie pozorów, o to, by wybory w Polsce znajdującej się pod sowiecką okupacją nie były skandalicznym fałszerstwem, potępionym przez opinię światową i eksponującym zdradę polskiego sojusznika przez jej brytyjskiego sprzymierzeńca.

Obecnie zarówno państwa bałtyckie, jak i Polska, niby zabezpieczone gwarancjami NATO, faktycznie łudzą się, zdaniem profesora Carpentera, ponieważ gwarancje te są blefem, a nie odbiciem faktycznego znaczenia owych państw dla USA. Są prawdziwymi „czekami bez pokrycia”, kompromitującymi polityków, którzy albo naiwnie wierzą w te gwarancje, albo perfidnie wysługują się obcym interesom kosztem własnej ojczyzny.

Niestety, prezydent Kaczyński jest „recydywistą”, ponieważ wcześniej, jako ówczesny minister sprawiedliwości i prokurator generalny, podpisał rozkaz przerwania ekshumacji w Jedwabnem, kiedy chodziło o ustalenie, ile osób zostało tam zamordowanych i w jaki sposób ludzie ci stracili życie. Oszuści z żydowskiego ruchu roszczeniowego, posługując się oszukańczą książką J. T. Grossa Sąsiedzi, sugerowali, że zwłoki tych Żydów, którzy nieśli rozbity pomnik Lenina, zostały pochowane na kirkucie, czyli żydowskim cmentarzu, a nie w stodole, gdzie się faktycznie znalazły po zastrzeleniu tych ludzi przez Niemców. Działo się to podczas niemieckiej okupacji, kiedy broń palna była dla Polaków absolutnie niedostępna, co zresztą potwierdza nawet Gross.

Perfidia Grossa polegała na kłamstwie, mającym na celu niedopuszczenie polskich badaczy medycyny sądowej do ustalenia, że ludzie, którzy nieśli rozbity pomnik Lenina, zostali zastrzeleni przez Niemców w stodole, po wykopaniu przez nich dołu w klepisku. Niemcy użyli około 400 litrów benzyny, żeby stodoła stanęła w ogniu. Ówczesny rabin Warszawy i Łodzi (obecny naczelny rabin Polski) Michael Schudrich skutecznie interweniował u Kaczyńskiego, żeby nie dopuścić do całkowitej kompromitacji oszustów z żydowskiego ruchu roszczeniowego, którzy fałszywie oskarżają Polaków, a jednocześnie bogacą się nieustannie, przejmując sumy odszkodowań np. ze strony banków szwajcarskich dla ofiar holokaustu.

Oszuści z żydowskiego ruchu roszczeniowego przywłaszczają sobie odszkodowania należne żydowskim ofiarom zbrodni niemieckich i wielokrotnie mnożą liczbę żyjących ofiar, jak dowodzi tego profesor Norman Finkelstein, autor książki Holocaust Industry. Autor ten miał przykre doświadczenia w czasie dwudziestu lat pokonywania trudności w uzyskaniu odszkodowania dla swojej matki, byłej więźniarki Auschwitz.

Lekcja profesora Carpentera udzielona prezydentowi Kaczyńskiemu nie powinna nikogo dziwić. Wiadomo z historii, począwszy od starożytności, że słabsze narody nie mogą polegać na obietnicach silniejszych. Przykładem są też doświadczenia Polaków w czasach napoleońskich, kiedy przelewali krew, walcząc pod wodzą Napoleona, który cynicznie kłamał i fałszywie obiecywał, że odbuduje Polskę niepodległą. Podobnie postępują dziś USA, udzielając fałszywych gwarancji bezpieczeństwa Polsce, jak dowodzi profesor Carpenter w swoim artykule The Limits of Deterrance.

Is this the same Hillary Rodham Clinton who referred to a former aide as a ” Fucking Jew Bastard “?

Strange!

W celu wytłumaczenia źródeł obecnego kryzysu należy przypomnieć, że bank centralny USA, Federal Reserve System, jest instytucją prywatną ukierunkowaną na zyski właścicieli i nie podlega kontroli rządu w Waszyngtonie. Jednocześnie wszystkie banki w USA obowiązuje wymóg prawny utrzymywania tylko „ułamkowych rezerw” w stosunku do sum udzielanych w pożyczkach („fractional reserve banking”).

Ten stan rzeczy stwarza zagrożenie w momencie, gdy duża liczba właścicieli rachunków oszczędnościowych oraz rachunków czekowych żąda wypłaty przekraczającej „ułamkową” lub „częściową” rezerwę, znajdującą się w danym momencie w banku. Jeżeli zdarzy się to w tym samym czasie kilku bankom, wytwarza się panika i następuje kryzys, który pogłębia fakt, że polityka monetarna USA i innych państw Zachodu nie znajduje się w rękach państwa. Jest sprawowana przez banki centralne, które mają prawo np. w USA drukować banknoty amerykańskie, ale należą do prywatnych właścicieli, działających na zasadzie zysku, a nie dla dobra państwa i jego obywateli.

Na obywatelach natomiast ciąży obowiązek płacenia podatków, między innymi na spłacanie długów państwowych, zaciąganych na zbrojenia lub w celu ratowania gospodarki w czasie kryzysu. Obecne wydatki rządu prezydenta Obamy na ratowanie zapaści gospodarczej USA są bez porównania mniejsze niż długi zaciągnięte przez prezydenta Busha na wojnę w Iraku. Przypomnijmy, że wojna ta została wywołana „dla dobra” Izraela, jak twierdzi profesor Zelikov, oraz w nadziei na zysk z rabunku paliwa, zdaniem Wolfowitza i Greenspana, byłego prezesa banku centralnego w USA. Za sprawą rządów Busha długi państwowe USA są obecnie wywindowane na najwyższy poziom w historii tego państwa.

Ludzi wprowadza się w błąd za pomocą kontrolowanych mediów, które szerzą fałszywą propagandę, że „wolny rynek” automatycznie zachowuje równowagę i nie podlega panice ani też nie przeżywa „śmierci kredytu,” jak to przedstawiała polska karykatura z XVI wieku. Początkiem obecnego kryzysu były oszustwa w sprzedaży kontraktów na wygórowane pożyczki hipoteczne, przedstawiane jako równie pewne jak bony skarbowe USA.

W rzeczywistości od trzydziestu lat klasa pracująca w USA biednieje i poziom płac stoi w martwym punkcie, podczas gdy poszczególni miliarderzy dorabiają się fortun, przenosząc miejsca pracy w produkcji do Chin i innych krajów taniej robocizny, takich jak Wietnam, gdzie płace wynoszą mały ułamek kosztów robocizny w USA. Naturalnie Amerykanie nie mogą oszczędzać, chcąc utrzymać swoją dotychczasową stopę życiową.

Rezultatem jest nagminne posługiwanie się lichwiarskimi kartami kredytowymi, a z drugiej strony gromadzenie połowy wszystkich pieniędzy na świecie w Azji Wschodniej, która dostarcza Amerykanom towarów na kredyt po stosunkowo niskich cenach, podczas gdy rząd w Waszyngtonie płaci bonami skarbowymi z deficytu w handlu zagranicznym. Przy czym premie pośredników za udzielanie nadmiernie wysokich pożyczek hipotecznych nie są uzależnione od tego, czy pożyczki te są spłacane, czy nie.

Prezydent Eisenhower powiedział przy końcu swojej kadencji, że jego następca J. F. Kennedy niebawem dowie się, iż prezydent USA nie ma kontroli ani nad arsenałem nuklearnym tego państwa, ani nad amerykańskim bankiem centralnym, który kontroluje ilość pieniądza w Stanach Zjednoczonych, kierując się własną korzyścią, według zasady, że ilość pieniądza wzrasta w rezultacie wzrostu cen i dochodów. Wynika to z tego, co napisałem na początku artykułu, że banki w USA podlegają wymogom prawnym utrzymywania tylko „ułamkowych rezerw” w stosunku do udzielanych pożyczek. Niektórzy politycy w historii USA narażali wręcz życie, starając się o wprowadzenie prawa wymagającego 100 procent rezerw w wysokości depozytów bankowych. Spotkałem się ze spekulacjami, że z tego właśnie powodu został zabity prezydent Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865).

Zdaniem specjalisty od polityki monetarnej w USA, profesora Miltona Friedmana, typ instytucji banków centralnych, takich jakie istnieją obecnie w Wlk. Brytanii i w Stanach Zjednoczonych, stwarza sytuację, w której rząd nie jest w stanie kontrolować ani ilości własnego pieniądza, ani tak zwanego „money supply”, czyli kwoty dolarów puszczanych w obieg. Jest to wynikiem prawa utrzymywania przez banki jedynie „ułamkowych rezerw” w stosunku do sum udzielanych w pożyczkach. Ten stan rzecz przyczynił się do obecnego kryzysu lichwiarskiego kapitalizmu na świecie

Członek parlamentu palestyńskiego Mustafa Barghouti napisał, że w ostatnich wyborach Izrael dokończył swojej transformacji w państwo apartheidu. Zasadniczo zgadza się z nim Neve Gordon, profesor nauk politycznych na uniwersytecie Ben-Guriona, autor książki Izrael’s Occupation.
Izrael, według profesora Gordona, żyje w stałym kryzysie i przed wyborami rysowały się dwie alternatywy. Albo nawrót ku moralności i zaakceptowaniu Arabów, albo dalszy zwrot na prawo ku ksenofobii, neofaszystowskich tendencji oraz propagandy w tradycji Talmudu, oskarżającej przeciwników o wszystkie własne grzechy.
W wyniku ostatnich wyborów mapa polityczna Izraela przesunęła się w kierunku skrajnej prawicy partii Kadima i Likud, które wywodzą się z żydowskiego ruchu faszystowskiego w przedwojennej Polsce, Bejtaru, do którego podobną nazwę nosi dzisiejsza partia Beitein, a samo słowa Beitar jest używane nadal w nazwach klubów sportowych. Obecnie trzy neofaszystowskie partie zdobyły głosy około 80 procent wyborców, co zapewne okaże się bardzo szkodliwe dla sprawy pokoju na Bliskim Wschodzie.
Podobnie sądzi dr Mustafa Barghouti, pisząc, że w wyniku ostatnich wyborów nastąpił nawrót do rasizmu żydowskiego, tak że państwo Izrael ulega ostatecznej transformacji w państwo apartheidu z rasistowskim systemem politycznym. Jest to rezultatem dwóch procesów. Pierwszy z nich to zakorzenienie w społeczeństwie strachu i nienawiści do Arabów w wyniku działań rządu Izraela oraz całego kompleksu wojskowo-przemysłowego, wspomaganego rasistowską indoktrynacją armii przez rabinat wojskowy. Drugim jest żydowska dominacja mediów zachodnich, które zwłaszcza pod naciskiem lobby Izraela praktycznie stały się wspólnikami w zbrodniach wojennych na terenie Gazy, Iraku, etc. W mediach tych panuje milczenie na temat rzeczywistości czterdziestoletniej okrutnej okupacji ziem Palestyńczyków.
Obecnie Izraelczycy uważają, że mogą bezkarnie robić z Arabami, co im się podoba, obserwując w mediach zachodnich kompletny brak krytyki wobec okrutnego łamania praw ludzkich przez Żydów w Palestynie. W rezultacie skrajni syjoniści doszli do przekonania, że dysponują dostateczną kontrolą nad opinią Zachodu, żeby móc iść w kierunku rasistowskiego systemu apartheidu, czego jesteśmy obecnie świadkami. Beniamin Natanyahu to otwarty rasista, a pani Livini pokrywa swój rasizm szminką. Barak przewyższa rasizmem oboje z nich, nie mówiąc o Avigdorze Liebermanie, niebezpiecznym neofaszyście, który publicznie chwali się, że mordował Palestyńczyków własnymi rękami.
Nic dziwnego, że zdaniem dra Mustafy Barghoutiego, nie pozostaje Palestyńczykom nic innego, jak walczyć przeciwko systemowi apartheidu, który ich niszczy. Podkreśla, iż jest obowiązkiem organizacji międzynarodowych zaprzestać ukrywania zbrodni Izraela przed światem.
Swego rodzaju wsparcie dla opinii Barghoutiego daje były marszałek Knesetu, Abraham Burg, autor książki The Holocaust Is Over: We Must Rise From Its Ashes (Holokaust minął: trzeba otrząsnąć się z popiołów). Burg jest obecnie jednym z najsurowszych krytyków rządu Izraela, mimo że w przeszłości był prezesem Jewish Agency oraz World Jewish Organization (Światowej Organizacji Syjonistów). Przewiduje on, że po utworzeniu nowego rządu Izraela nadal będą trwać mordercze ataki na ludność terenów Gazy, połączone z blokadą, jak i dalsza rozbudowa nielegalnych osiedli żydowskich na ziemiach palestyńskich.
Zarówno Palestyńczycy, jak i coroczne rezolucje ONZ, domagają się od Izraela końca okupacji i powrotu do granic z 1967 roku. Premier palestyński Salaam Fayad oficjalnie żąda od nowego rządu Izraela zakończenia ponad czterdziestoletniej okupacji ziem palestyńskich.
Były prezydent USA Jimmy Carter opublikował nową książkę pod tytułem: We Can Have Peace In the Holly Land: A Plan that Will Work (Pokój jest możliwy w Ziemi Świętej: plan, który może się udać). Ponieważ poprzednia książka prezydenta Cartera, której tytuł w tłumaczeniu brzmi: „Palestyna: pokój, nie apartheid”, krytykowała okupacyjną politykę rządu Izraela na palestyńskich terenach Gazy oraz zachodniego brzegu rzeki Jordan, jej autora nie dopuszczono do głosu na zjeździe partii demokratycznej w Denver.
Opisany w nowej książce „plan Cartera” stanowi odwrotność planów rasistów izraelskich, którzy dążą do stworzenia jednego „czysto” żydowskiego państwa od Morza Śródziemnego do rzeki Jordan, podczas gdy opinia światowa, ONZ, oraz wszystkie państwa arabskie żądają powrotu do granic z 1967 roku.
Carter proponuje, żeby pozostawić nielegalne osiedla i pół miliona Żydów na wschód od Jerozolimy aż do rzeki Jordan, a jednocześnie udostępnić Arabom tunel lub kolej i szosę przez te tereny oraz wydzielić dla nich z ziem Izraela równej wielkości obszar (pustynny?) na południu tego państwa. Według Cartera, zbrodniczy i morderczy napad na tereny Gazy może w reakcji przynieść poparcie dla jego planu.
Tymczasem Izrael dopuszcza na tereny Gazy tylko 15 do 25 procent żywności, leków i pitnej wody koniecznej dla półtora miliona Arabów, uwięzionych i blokowanych tak od strony morza, jak i w granicach lądowych. Dlatego tereny te opisywane są jako jeden wielki obóz śmierci dla ludności arabskiej.
Były prezydent Carter jest zdania, że USA powinny nieść pomoc prześladowanej ludności arabskiej w wysokości 10 milionów dolarów dziennie, tak jak to wypłaca Izraelowi skarb USA, mimo pogwałcenia przez to państwo traktatu przeciwko rozpowszechnianiu broni nuklearnej i twardej obrony swego monopolu nuklearnego na Bliskim Wschodzie.

Drukuj Dodano/uzupełniono

Radykalizacja Izraela od śmierci Yitzaka Rabina by Professor Pogonowski

Nastąpiła wyraźna radykalizacji Izraela od śmierci premiera Yitzak‘a Rabin’a, który był zamordowany strzałem w plecy, w listopadzie 1995 przez radykalnego syjonistę Yigal’a Amir’a. Wówczas dwie trzecie obywateli Izraela popierało zawarcie pokoju z Arabami i powrót do granic z 1967 roku, mimo mylnych sloganów, że Żydzi byli zmuszeni do „płacenia ziemią za pokój,” kiedy chodziło o ewakuacją przez Izrael nielegalnie okupowanych terenów palestyńskich.

Obecnie atmosfera zmienia się tak dalece, że turecki premier Recept Tayyip Erdogan, głowa rządu państwa zaprzyjaźnionego z Izraelem, powiedział 31 stycznia, 2009, że „Palestyna jest więzieniem pod gołym niebem.” Ludobójstwo ponad 1300 arabskich mieszkańców terenów Gazy przez wojska Izraela zaogniło atmosferę przed wyborami 10tego lutego, 2009, kiedy wyborcy izraelscy wybiorą nowy parlament oraz nowego premiera.

Premierem może zostać radykalny syjonista i zwolennik ataku na Iran, Bnjamin Netanyahu z partii Likud pochodzącej z żydowskiego ruchu faszystowskiego, Bejtaru, w przed-wojennej Polsce. Partia ta może wygrać 35 głosów w 120 osobowym Knessecie. Jak wiadomo Netanyahu był przeciwnikiem zakończenia okupacji terenu Gazy, która już wówczas była przez dysydentów izraelskich przyrównywana do więzienia amerykańskiego na wyspie Alcatraz, po 38 latach okupacji izraelskiej.

Netanyahu zaleca bezlitosne wytępienie zwolenników palestyńskiej partii niepodległościowej Hamas’u na terenie Gazy. Ironią losu jest, że wielu historyków nazywa Hamas „dzieckiem Izraela,” ponieważ rząd izraelski zorganizował religijną partię Hamas jako przeciw-wagę partii Fatah, dowodzonej wówczas przez Arafat’a. Hamas pod dowództwem Szejkh’a Ahmed’a Yassin’a miał regularny kontakt z rządem Izraela w latach 1970tych i 1980tych by w końcu zginąć z rąk służb Izraela.

Rząd Izraela nie pozwala na udział w nadchodzących wyborach Arabów, obywateli Izraela, których jest półtora miliona, wśród siedmiu milionów obywateli Izraela. Dotąd mieli oni trzy miejsca w Knessecie, ale obecnie są oskarżeni o sympatyzowanie z terrorystami. Naturalnie zakaz udziału Arabów w wyborach izraelskich kompromituje demokracją izraelską, ale radykalni syjoniści powiązani z lobby Izraela w USA, nie przejmują się tymi oskarżeniami, podczas gdy Arabowie izraelscy złożyli prawdopodobnie bezskuteczną skargę w Sądzie Najwyższym Izraela.

Turcja, według Associated Press, zwróciła się do rządu prezydenta Obamy o nową definicją terroru i organizacji terrorystycznych na Bliskim Wschodzie, w celu uzyskania nowej podstawy polityki USA na Bliskim Wschodzie w czasie wizyty przedstawiciela USA, b. Senatora George’a Mitchell’a, syna kobiety libańskiego pochodzenia, który wykazał się jako skuteczny rozjemca w Irlandii.

Turcja zwraca uwagę, że od początku rząd Izraela był pod dowództwem ludzi znanych z aktów terroru, włącznie z mordem komisarza ONZ Folke Bernardotte. Obecnie pod wpływem lobby Izraela, USA uważa Hamas i Hizbullah jako organizacje terrorystyczne, które mają własne siły zbrojne. Hamas wygrało wybory na terenie Gazy w 2007 roku i jest tam do dziś przy władzy. Natomiast Hisbullah jest legalną partią polityczną w Libanie. Według prawa międzynarodowego obie te organizacje mają prawo bronić się według konwencji genewskich z 1949 roku.

Jako świeckie państwo muzułmańskie i członek NATO ubiegający się o członkostwo w Unii Europejskiej, Turcja pośredniczy między Hamas’em i Hizbullah a innymi członkami NATO. W czasie ataku Izraela na tereny Gazy, 27 grudnia 2008, w ostatnich dniach kadencji usłużnego wobec syjonistów prezydenta Bush’a, Turcja prowadziła pertraktacje na rzecz pogodzenia Izraela z Syrią. Atak Izraela na tereny Gazy Turcy poczytali jako zniewagę pod ich adresem i dalsze zagrożenie pokoju na Bliskim Wschodzie przez rząd izraelski.

Przedstawiciel Iranu w Davos, Manouchechr Mottami powiedział, że cały region Zatoki Perskiej jest skłonny współpracować z rządem prezydenta Obamy, jeżeli rząd ten zaprzestanie polityki konfrontacji, inspirowanych przez Izrael, to osiągnie on szybkie rozwiązanie przeciągających się kontrowersji przeciwko Iranowi w sprawie broni nuklearnych. Teheran nie wie czy zmiany w polityce USA będą poważnymi zmianami strategicznymi czy tylko taktycznymi.

Radykalizacji polityki Izraela od śmierci premiera Yitzak‘a Rabin’a jest ewidentna. Wojna przeciw Irakowi jest najdłuższą wojną w historii USA. Propagowana pod hasłem „wolność Iraku” była uzasadniana przez lobby Izraela oskarżeniem, że „Irak zagraża istnieniu Izraela.” W rzeczywistości wojna ta była prowadzona dla dobra Izraela, według prezesa komisji 9/11 profesora Zelikowa. Obecnie atak na Iran jest znowu uzasadniany hasłem, że „Iran zagraża egzystencji Izraela.” Miejmy nadzieję, że prezydent Obama nie postąpi tak jak jego poprzednik.

Professor Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Born Sept. 3, 1921
Lwów, Poland

in Dec 1939 left Warsaw. Dec 30, 1939 arrested by Ukrainians serving the Gestapo in Dukla, then transferred to Barwinek, Krosno, Jaslo, Tarnów, Oswiecim, arrived in Oranienburg-Sachsenhausen on Aug. 10, 1940.

April 19, 1945 started on the Death March of Brandenburg from Sachsenhausen; escaped gunfire of SS-guards and arrived to Schwerin and freedom on May 2, 1945.

September 1945 arrived in Brussels, Belgium; obtained admission as a regular student at the Catholic University: Institute Superieur de Commerce, St. Ignace in Antwerp.

in 1954 graduated in Civil Engineering at the top of his class. Was invited to join honorary societies: Tau Beta Pi (general engineering honorary society), Phi Kappa Phi (academic honorary society equivalent to Phi Beta Kappa), Pi Mu (mechanical engineering honorary society), and Chi Epsilon (civil engineering honorary society). Taught descriptive geometry at the University of Tennessee;

in 1955 graduated with M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering.

in 1955 started working for Shell Oil Company in New Orleans. After one year of managerial training was assigned to design of marine structures for drilling and production of petroleum.

in 1960 started working for Texaco Research and Development in Houston, Texas as a Project Engineer. Authored total of 50 American and foreign patents on marine structures for the petroleum industry;
wrote an article: The Rise and Fall of the Polish Commonwealth – A Quest for a Representative Government in Central and Eastern Europe in the 14th to 18th Centuries. Started to work on a Tabular History of Poland.

in 1972 moved to Blacksburg, Virginia. During the following years worked as Consulting Engineer for Texaco, also taught in Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University as Adjunct Professor in the College of Civil Engineering teaching courses on marine structures of the petroleum industry. Designed and supervised the construction of a hill top home for his family, also bought 500 acre ranch (near Thomas Jefferson National Forest) where he restored 200 years old mill house on a mountain stream.

in 1978 prepared Polish-English, English-Polish Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. The dictionary included a Tabular History of Poland, Polish Language, People, and Culture as well as Pogonowski’s phonetic symbols for phonetic transcriptions in English and Polish at each dictionary entry; the phonetic explanations were illustrated with cross-sections of speech (organs used to pronounce the sounds unfamiliar to the users). It was the first dictionary with phonetic transcription at each Polish entry for use by English speakers

in 1981 prepared Practical Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1983 prepared Concise Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. Wrote an analysis of Michael Ch ci ski’s Poland, Communism, Nationalism, Anti-Semitism. Also selected crucial quotations from Norman Davies’ God’s Playground – A History of Poland on the subject of the Polish indigenous democratic process.

in 1985 prepared Polish-English Standard Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. Also prepared a revised and expanded edition of the Concise Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics, also published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1987 prepared Poland: A Historical Atlas on Polish History and Prehistory including 200 maps and graphs as well as Chronology of Poland’s Constitutional and Political Development, and the Evolution of Polish Identity – The Milestones. An introductory chapter was entitled Poland the Middle Ground. Aloysius A. Mazewski President of Polish-American Congress wrote an introduction. The Atlas was published by Hippocrene Books Inc. and later by Dorset Press of the Barnes and Noble Co. Inc. which sends some 30 million catalogues to American homes including color reproduction of book covers. Thus, many Americans were exposed to the cover of Pogonowski’s Atlas showing the range of borders of Poland during the history – many found out for the firsttime that Poland was an important power in the past. Total of about 30,000 atlases were printed so far.

In 1988 the publication of Poland: A Historical Atlas resulted in a number of invitations extended by several Polonian organizations to Iwo Pogonowski to present Television Programs on Polish History. Pogonowski responded and produced over two year period 220 half-hour video programs in his studio at home (and at his own expense.) These programs formed a serial entitled: Poland, A History of One Thousand Years. Total of over 1000 broadcasts of these programs were transmitted by cable television in Chicago, Detroit-Hamtramck, Cleveland, and Blacksburg.

in 1990-1991 translated from the Russian the Catechism of a Revolutionary of 1869 in which crime has been treated as a normal part of the revolutionary program. Started preparation of the Killing the Best and the Brightest: A Chronology of the USSR-German Attempt to Behead the Polish Nation showing how the USSR became a prototype of modern totalitarian state, how this prototype was adapted in Germany by the Nazis.

in 1991 prepared Polish Phrasebook, Polish Conversations for Americans including picture code for gender and familiarity, published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1991 prepared English Conversations for Poles with Concise Dictionary published by Hippocrene Books Inc. By then a total of over 100,000 Polish-English, English-Polish Dictionaries written by Pogonowski were sold in the United States and abroad.

in 1992 prepared a Dictionary of Polish, Latin, Hebrew, and Yiddish Terms used in Contacts between Poles and Jews. It was prepared for the history of Jews in Poland as well as 115 maps and graphs and 172 illustrations, paintings, drawings, and documents, etc. of Jewish life in Poland. This material was accompanied by proper annotations.

in 1993 prepared Jews in Poland, Rise of the Jews as a Nation from Congressus Judaicus in Poland to the Knesset in Israel, published by Hippocrene Books Inc. in 3000 copies. Foreword was written by Richard Pipes, professor of history at Harvard University, and Pogonowski’s school mate in the Keczmar school in Warsaw. Part I included: a Synopsis of 1000 Year History of Jews in Poland; the 1264 Statute of Jewish Liberties in Poland in Latin and English translation; Jewish Autonomy in Poland 1264-1795; German Annihilation of the Jews. In appendixes are documents and illustrations. An Atlas is in the Part III. It is divided as follows: Early Jewish Settlements 966-1264; The Crucial 500 Years, 1264-1795; Competition (between Poles and Jews) Under Foreign Rule, 1795-1918; The Last Blossoming of Jewish Culture in Poland, 1918-1939; German Genocide of the Jews, 1940-1944; Jewish Escape from Europe 1945-1947 – The End of European (Polish) Phase of Jewish History (when most of world’s Jewry lived in Europe). Pogonowski began to write a new book starting with the Chronology of the Martyrdom of Polish Intelligentsia during World War II and the Stalinist Terror; the book in preparation was entitled Killing the Best and the Brightest.

in 1995 prepared Dictionary of Polish Business, Legal and Associated Terms for use with the new edition of the Practical Polish-English, English-Polish Dictionary and later to be published as a separate book.

in 1996 Pogonowski’s Poland: A Historical Atlas; was translated into Polish; some 130 of the original 200 maps printed in color; the Chronology of Poland was also translated into Polish. The Atlas was published by Wydawnictwo Suszczy ski I Baran in Kraków in 3000 copies; additional publications are expected. Prepared Polish-English, Eglish-Polish Compact Dictionary with complete phonetics, published by Hippocrene Books Inc.

in 1997 finished preparation of the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary with complete phonetics including over 200,000 entries, in three volumes on total of 4000 pages; it is published by Hippocrene Books Inc; the Polish title is: Uniwesalny S ownik Polsko-Angielski. Besides years of work Pogonowski spent over $50,000 on computers, computer services, typing, and proof reading in order to make the 4000 page dictionary camera ready; assisted in the preparation of second edition of Jews in Poland, Rise of the Jews from Congressus Judaicus in Poland to the Knesset in Israel published in fall of 1997. Prepared computer programs for English-Polish Dictionary to serve as a companion to the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary printed by the end of May 1997.

in 1998 Pogonowski organized preparation of CD ROM for the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary, Practical English-Polish Dictionary, Polish Phrasebook for Tourists and Travelers to Poland, all published earlier by Iwo C. Pogonowski. The Phrasebook includes 280 minutes of bilingual audio read by actors. Started preparation for a new edition of Poland: A Historical Atlas. New Appendices are being prepared on such subjects as: Polish contribution to Allied’s wartime intelligence: the breaking of the Enigma Codes, Pune Munde rocket production; Poland’s contribution to the international law since 1415; Poland’s early development of rocket technology such as Polish Rocketry Handbook published in 1650 in which Poles introduced for the first time into the world’s literature concepts of multiple warheads, multistage rockets, new controls in rocket flight, etc. Poland’s Chronology is being enlarged to reflect the mechanisms of subjugation of Polish people by the Soviet terror apparatus. Continued preparation of the Killing the Best and the Brightest: A Chronology of the USSR-German Attempt to Behead the Polish Nation, including the 1992 revelations from Soviet archives as well as the current research in Poland. Continued preparation of two-volume English Polish Dictionary, a companion to the Unabridged Polish-English Dictionary published in 1997. Reviewed Upiorna Dekada by J. T. Gross.

in 1999 Pogonowski continued writing Poland – An Illustrated History and preparing for it 21 maps and diagrams and 89 illustrations.

in 2000 Pogonowski prepared, in a camera ready form, Poland – An Illustrated History; it was published by Hippocrene Books Inc. NY 2000 and recommended by Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor under President Carter, as “An important contribution to the better understanding of Polish history, which demonstrates in a vivid fashion the historical vicissitudes of that major European nation.”

W Polsce Żydów nie wypada krytykować, można narazić się tym, nie tylko środowiskom żydowskim, ale i mediom. Można za to do woli krytykować inne narodowości – Romów, Ukraińców czy Niemców. Wystarczy tylko powiedzieć jedno zdanie krytykujące postawy czy działania środowisk żydowskich a posądzenia o antysemityzm i nietolerancję są pewne.

Żydzi to naród, dla którego los nie był łaskawy. Po zakończonych klęską powstaniach żydowskich, które miały miejsce pod koniec I i na początku II wieku naszej ery, Żydzi zostali wygnani z Palestyny. Od tamtej pory większość narodu żydowskiego żyła w diasporze. To, co z pewnością wyróżnia ten naród od innych, to fakt, że mimo rozproszenia po całym świecie zachował swoją tożsamość i kulturę. To, co ich łączy, niezależnie od miejsca zamieszkania to najczęściej religia. Wielka wiara, jaką nacechowani są Żydzi, pozwoliła im przez ponad dwa tysiące lat zachować swoją kulturę. Naród ten jest bardzo solidarny.

Politycy, media, dyplomaci, tematu Żydów unikają jak ognia. Boją się, aby przypadkiem nie powiedzieć złego słowa o tym narodzie, co zresztą media skrzętnie na pewno by odnotowały i opisały, przypisując owej osobie “antysemityzm” To, co skłoniło mnie do napisania tego artykułu, to moja wędrówka po forum internetowym, gdzie ludzie wyrażają swoje opinie bez żadnych zahamowań, piszą co myślą. Choć te opinie często są skrajne, to na pewno nie można zarzucić im jakiejś zależności, zależności, która z oczywsitych względów występuje w wypowiedziach polityków czy w mediach.

Osoba o nicku Pełny Nienawiści napisała: “Dlaczego Arabów, którzy walczą o swoje ziemie nazywa się terrorystami a Żydów, którzy ich wypędzili ze swoich ziem się głaszcze? Gdzie jest ONZ?” Inny forumowicz napisał: “Wielu ludzi po prostu lituje się nad Żydami wiedząc, przez co oni przeszli w okresie II wojny światowej. Natomiast wielu jest ociemniałych, którzy nie wiedzą, co Żydzi zrobili i robią tym, których uważa się dziś za terrorystów.”

Dlaczego w Polsce i nie tylko, temat Żydów jest tematem tabu, dlaczego większość boi się ich krytykować? Może boją się reakcji mediów i przypięcia etykiety antysemity. Broń Boże, nie jestem żadnym antysemitą, tylko uważam, że Żydzi to taki sam naród, jak każdy inny.

Protestant fundamentalism originated among Anglo-Saxons because of the obligation, introduced several centuries ago in Protestant (Calvinist) sects in Britain to read the Old Testament. This resulted in judaizing of British culture, which made Britain vulnerable to the influence of Jewish extremists based on the principles of the Talmud.

The Talmud teaches that Jews are not obligated to treat non-Jews in accordance with the Ten Commandments and refers to the non-Jews (Goims) as cattle. On the other hand there, there have always been Jewish writers and thinkers, such as Israel Shahak, who openly condemned the views presented in the Talmud and saw in them the source of many misfortunes. However, radical Zionists, ruling today in Israel, apply Talmudic precepts in relation to Arabs and Persians.

Jeff’a Sharlet’s, book „The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power” (Harper Collin, 2008, ISBN: 00605597 990), describes the heretical Christian point of view held by the elite cult of the richest Protestant fundamentalists in the US. The Cult glorifies wealth and power while it cultivates contempt for for compassion and mercy.

Reviewers claim that this book is very thoroughly documented and proves that a conspiracy of millionaires and billionaires among fundamentalist in the US is fighting to take over the world. They consider themselves “chosen” by God, as proven by their personal wealth, as result of divine grace and reward for belonging to their sect. Among them are many congressmen, generals, and government officials controlled by “The Family,” both in the United States and
In the so called “banana republics,” dominated by the US.

The author, Jeff Sarlet is so far the only journalist who succeeded in documenting the activities of the hidden elite, headquartered in Arlington, on the outskirts of Washington DC, “The Family,” at the core of American fundamentalist Protestant power, was originally created along the lines of European fascism in 1935 by Abraham Vereide, who organized the wealthy internationalist elite.

This secret “Family” elite is prospering today. Is most public activity is the annual White House – Congressional “Preayer Breakfest” innagurated during the administration of President Eisenhower, in the 1950’s. Central to the group faith are belief in the “biblical capitaliusm,” U.S. military power, and global domination by the U.S. Many operational principles are derived by studying thew methods of Lenin, Hitler, and Mao, to be applied in the name of peace in the subordination of the governments or through “regime change.”

Sharlet documents how far this secret elite deviates from the generally accepted view of Protestant fundamentalism and shows how influential it has been in the “war against terror” and earlier in the “Cold War” as well as in the “free enterprise” neo-colonial globalization. Sharlet writes that instead of asking what secret elite wants, one should inquire into what they already have done.

As Sharlet describes it, this elite treats Jesus as a kind of managing director, lobbyist, and even fascist leader. They have had an enormous impact on the beliefs of Americans in the 20th century and on U.S. imperialist policy in the 21st century, through their secret machinations which have been unsuspected by most Americans.

Practically unknown elite of Protestant fundamentalist heretics controls American nuclear arsenal and is mainly motivated by the desire to accumulate personal wealth to the greatest extent possible. One byproduct of their beliefs is a contempt for the historical view of Christianity as a religion of mercy, compassion and concern for the less fortunate. Ironically, according to Sharlet, this elite views the U.S. as having been created as a “Christian nation.” In general they make efforts to avoid clashing with Talmudic radical Zionists in the pursuit of mutually agreeable goals.

Thanks to Sharlet’s book, for the first time, American public gain insight into how an economic and political elite is able to direct U.S. policy in spite of denying the most fundamental Christian principles while considering itself a Christian organization. Their heresy elevates selfishness and lust for dominance to the level of Christian virtue.

yes the Italian person living in Krakow Poland “Roberto Lucchesini, originally from Tuscany, for several years now a resident of Krakow, hasn’t been sleeping well recently. Before he will be able to move his arms normally again, he will have to go through long rehab. All this because of how he was treated, in broad daylight in front of passers-by and several teenagers who were hermetically closed in their coach-buses. Israeli bodyguards, equipped with firearms, binded his arms behind his back over his head with handcuffs. In Krakow, in the middle of the street. A moment before, the Italian was trying to make coach drivers parking in front of his house turn their engines off. – ‘Israelis handcuffed me, threw me on the ground, my face landed in dog excrement, and then they were kicking me’. After that the perpetrators were gone. Italian had to be freed by the Polish police.”
he did purchase his house in Poland he did paid! and you came to Poland with the claims which are all fraud!

Israel have to pay money to the Polish People the money you got from Germany Switzerland Astria and you never shared with Polish citizens suffered enormously during the Holocaust — Jews and non-Jews.
You just keep the Money to buy arms and destroy other countries.
One day the leaders of the Israel will go to the International Court.

Poland will neve pay any money to radicals of the Zionist Movement. You have to pay back to Poland

Source: Przekrój weekly of May the 10th 2007
Link to original article in Polish
Author: Anna Szulc
English translation: MoPoPressReview
The list of losses Israeli teenagers’ visits leave behind is long and costly. It begins with burned carpets in Polish hotels, and ends with Jewish teenagers’ trauma. But more and more often with local residents’ trauma too.

Roberto Lucchesini, originally from Tuscany, for several years now a resident of Krakow, hasn’t been sleeping well recently. Before he will be able to move his arms normally again, he will have to go through long rehab. All this because of how he was treated, in broad daylight in front of passers-by and several teenagers who were hermetically closed in their coach-buses. Israeli bodyguards, equipped with firearms, binded his arms behind his back over his head with handcuffs. In Krakow, in the middle of the street. A moment before, the Italian was trying to make coach drivers parking in front of his house turn their engines off. – ‘Israelis handcuffed me, threw me on the ground, my face landed in dog excrement, and then they were kicking me’. After that the perpetrators were gone. Italian had to be freed by the Polish police.

Lucchesini moved to Kazimierz, a district of Kraków, that used to be a Jewish commune of which the only things left now are synagogues and memories, often painful. He found an apartment with a view on the synagogue. – ‘Back then I had thought this was the most beautiful place on Earth’ – he says – ‘after some time I understood that the place is indeed beautiful, but not for its today’s residents’.

Kicking instead of answers

Jews search tourist

Other resident of Kazimierz, Beata W., office worker is of similar opinion. Israeli security searched her handbag on one of the streets, without telling her why.
- ‘When I asked what was this all about, they told me to shut up. I listened, I stopped talking, I was afraid they’d tell me to get undressed next’ – she says annoyed.
A young polish Jew, who as usual in Sabbath, went to pray in his synagogue couple months ago, also didn’t get his answer. He only asked, why can’t he enter the temple. Instead of an answer, he got kicked.
- ‘I saw this with my own eyes’ – says Mike Urbaniak, the editor of Forum Of Polish Jews and correspondent of European Jewish Press in Poland. – ‘I saw how my friend is being brutally attacked by security agents from Israel, without any reason.’

All this apparently in sake of Israeli childrens’ safety.
- ‘For Poles it may be difficult to understand, but security agents accompany Israelis at all times, both in Israel and abroad’ – explains Michał Sobelman, a spokesman for Israeli embassy in Poland. – ‘This is a parents’ demand, otherwise they wouldn’t agree for any kind of trip. Poland is no exception.’

But it was in Poland, as Mike Urbaniak reports, where Jews from Israel brutally kicked a Polish Jew in front of a synagogue, and then threatened him with prison. In plain view of the Israeli teenagers.

- ‘We are very sorry when we hear about such incidents’ – Sobelman admits – ‘Detailed analysis is carried out in each case. We will do everything we can, to prevent such situations in the future. Maybe we will have to change training methods of our security agents, so that they would know Poland is not like Israel, that the scale of threats here is insignificant?

Professor Moshe Zimmermann, head of German History Institute at Hebrew University in Jerusalem thinks however, that the problem is not only in the security agents’ behaviour. He thinks Israelis basically think that Poles aren’t equal partners for them. And it’s not only that they think Poles can’t ensure their children’s safety.

- ‘They are not equal partners to any kind of discussion. It applies also to our common history, contemporary history and politics. In result Israeli youth see Poles as second category people, as potential enemies’ – he explains bluntly.

An instruction on conduct with the local inhabitants given away to Israeli teenagers coming to Poland couple years ago may confirm professor’s opinion. It contained such a paragraph: ‘Everywhere we will be surrounded by Poles. We will hate them because of their participation in Holocaust’.

Jews hate Poles

- ‘Agendas of our teenagers’ trips to Poland are set in advance by the Israeli government, and are not flexible’ – says Ilona Dworak-Cousin, the chairwoman of the Polish-Israeli Friendship Association in Israel. – ‘Those trips basically come down to visiting, one by one, the places of extermination of Jews. From that perspective Poland is just a huge Jewish graveyard. And nothing more. Meeting living people, for those who organise these trips, is meaningless.’

A resident of Kraków’s Kazimierz district, who is of Jewish descent, says that there is nothing wrong with that: – ‘Israelis don’t come to Poland for holiday. Their aim is to see the sites of Shoah and listen to the terrifying history of their families, history that often is not told to them by their grandparents, because of its emotional weight. Often young people who are leaving, cry, phone their parents and say “why didn’t you tell me it was that horrible?”. To be frank, I am not surprised they have no interest in talking about Lajkonik‘.

However according to Ilona Dworak-Cousin the lack of contact with Poles, causes Israeli youth to confuse victims with the perpetrators. – ‘They start to think it were the Poles who created concentration camps for Jews, that it is the Polish who were and still are the biggest anti-Semites in the world’ – adds Dworak-Cousin, who is Jewish herself.

The above mentioned Kraków resident has a different opinion. – ‘I don’t believe anyone was telling them that the Poles had been doing this. That’s why there is no need for discussing anything with the Poles’.

Teenagers behaving badly

However, many Israelis say that although the instruction was eventually changed, the attitude to Poles has not changed at all.
- ‘Someone in Israel some day decided, that our children going to Poland have to be hermetically surrounded by security’ – says Lili Haber president of Cracovians Association in Israel. – ‘Someone decided that young Israelis cannot meet young Poles, and cannot walk the streets. Basically these visits aren’t anything else but a several-day-long voluntary prison.’

RIch brat jews

Voluntary, but also very expensive: 1400 USD per person. Not every Israeli parent can afford such a trip.

- ‘Moreover, as it turns out, the children are too young, to visit sites of mass murders’ – adds dr Ilona Dworak-Cousin. Traumatic experiences that accompany visits in death camps have its consequences. Kids become aggressive. And instead of getting to know the country of their ancestors, in which Jews and Poles lived in symbiosis for over 1000 years, Israeli teenagers cause one scandal after another.

Shitting in beds

It happens sometimes, that somewhere between Majdanek and Treblinka, young Israelis spend their time on striptease ordered via the hotel telephone. It happens sometimes, that the hotel service has to collect human excrement from hotel beds and washbasins. It happens sometimes, that hotels have to give money back to other tourists, who cannot sleep because Israeli kids decided to play football in hotel corridor. In the middle of the night.

Jews block streets

6-year-old Krzys from Kazimierz played football too. On Sunday night on 15th April, after shooting two goals, he wanted to go home, as usual. He lives near a synagogue, in front of which hundreds of young Israelis have gathered on celebrations preceding March of Living. Just before Szeroka street he was stopped by some not-so-nice men. – ‘This is a semi-private area today. There is no entry’ – he was told. It didn’t help, when he told them, his mum will get upset if he won’t be home on time.

Security officers, which is interesting, were Polish this time and accompanied by the Polish police. They also denied access to the area to a Dutch couple, who had reserved a table at one of the restaurants on Szeroka street six months ago. – ‘Is this a free country?’ – One of the tourists tried to make sure.

On a normal day you can access Szeroka street from several sides. That evening from none. I tried to get through myself, without any success. Only eventually, the police helped me to pass the security line.

- ‘There are no official restrictions here’ – they were convincing me a moment later, although the “unofficial practice” was different.

- ‘We have only set certain restrictions in movement’ – Sylvia Bober-Jasnoch, a spokeswoman for Malopolska Region Police press service, explained to me later.

The police cannot say anything else. Polish law does not allow residents to be denied access to the streets they live at. Even during the so called mass events (however the celebrations on Szeroka did not have that status) residents have the right to go back to their homes and tourists have the right to dine in a restaurant. Also Israeli security agents have no right to stop or search passers-by.

I tried to find out more on the rights of Israeli security agents in Poland. First at the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, from where my question was sent to…. the Ministry of Education. I have also sent questions to the Home Office. Although I was promised, I received no answer. Only person eager to talk on that matter was Maciej Kozłowski, former ambassador in Israel, currently the Plenipotentiary of the Minister of Foreign Affairs for Polish-Israeli relations.

- ‘Regulations are imprecise’ – admits Kozłowski. ‘Basically bodyguards from a foreign country should not move around Poland armed. However for the government of Israel security matters are a priority. Any convincing that their citizens should use the services of Polish security turned unsuccessful’.

Airplane like battle field

The Polish-Italian couple, Robert Lucchesini, his wife Anna, and their two-year-old daughter, cannot understand Polish government’s attitude. Which contrary to the Israeli government, is not able to ensure the safety of its citizens. Safety is not the only thing among the pair’s priorities, but also peace and quietness. They are however being woken up every morning by the loud noises of engines, of the Polish coach-buses with groups of Israeli youth. Their Polish drivers brake driving regulations all the time. They’re allowed to park at the square near the synagogue (in front of Robert’s house) only for up to 10 minutes. They stay there much longer, even hours. With their engines turned on. Reason? Youth’s safety – they would be able to leave quicker in case of a threat. And because Israeli kids need to be served coffee. Because even though Kazimierz is full of cafes, Israeli teenagers don’t go there. They are being told: no contacts with environment, no talking to passers-by, no smiles nor gestures.

This has been going for years. Israeli groups contact with Poles only there where they have to. First in airplanes.

Slapped stewardess

- ‘A plane after such group has landed, looks like a battle field’ – admits a worker of LOT Polish Airlines asking for his name not to be published. – ‘The worst thing is these kids’ attitude to Polish staff. Recently a stewardess was slapped by a teenager in her face. Because he had been waiting for his coca-cola too long’.

Leszek Chorzewski, LOT spokesman, admits that Israeli youth is a difficult customer. – ‘They demand not only more attention then other passengers, but also more security precautions’ – he adds. These precautions are long aircraft and airport controls conducted by Israeli services. These are also the high demands of the teenagers’ security agents.

Katarzyna Łazuga, student from Poznań, could see that first hand. She participated in a tourist guides’ training on one of Polish airports. ‘Young people from Israel entered the room we were in’, she recalls. – ‘Our group was then made to stop classes and rushed out of the room. Israeli security officers told us to go out, right now and without any talking. Because… we were “staring” at their clients. Yes, we were looking at them. They were catching attention, they were good looking.’

Young Israelis see Poles also there, where they board – in Polish hotels. If any of them still wants to have them. Most of those in Kraków don’t want to any more.

- ‘We have resigned from admitting Israeli youth once and for all’ – admits Agnieszka Tomczyk, assistant manageress in a chain of hotels called System. ‘We could not afford to refund the loses after their stays any more’.

Shiting in beds

These loses being: demolished rooms, broken chairs and tables, human excrements in washbasins or trash bins, or like in Astoria, other hotel in Kraków, burned carpet. Astoria also backs out from having Israeli groups. One of the reasons is that the teenagers’ security agents were ordering other guests, whom they didn’t like, to leave.

- ‘I understand that Israeli security agents are over-sensitive to any disturbing signals. They are coming from a country where bombs explode almost daily, and young people die in terrorist attacks’ – ensures Mike Urbaniak. – ‘But Poland is one of the safest countries in Europe. Here, excluding tiny number of incidents, Jews are not being attacked, and Jewish institutions don’t need security, which is very unusual on a world scale’.

Huge business

Chasidim, travelling in great numbers from Israel, also (surprisingly) don’t need security agents. Including for example many Orthodox Jews, who came to visit our country recently, as they wanted to pray at Tzadik of Lelów’s grave. They came to the market square in Kazimierz without any security assistance and without any fear.

- ‘They chatted eagerly with tourists interested in their outfits, with passers-by who don’t see Jews with side curls every day’ – adds Urbaniak.

In Kazimierz chasidim are nothing unusual. Like groups of Israeli teenagers. This year 30,000 Israeli teenagers are coming to Poland, and they will have 800 security agents to protect them.

Roberto Lucchesini reported to the Polish police that he got beaten by Israeli security. Krakow Prosecution Office is investigating the case, and so is its counterpart in Israel.

- ‘Results of this investigation are of medium importance’ – thinks Ilona Dworak-Cousin. – ‘What matters is if the youth that visits Poland, will still treat it as hostile and completely alien country’.

Polish-Israeli Friendship Association in Israel and Cracovians Association in Israel both try to convince the government of their country, not to send any more teenagers to see only the death camps in Poland. Chances are slim.

- ‘These trips are mostly a huge business for people who organise them’ – says Lili Haber – ‘including Israeli bodyguards’.

ANDREZEJ WAJDA FILM,1957,”Watch them closely,for these are the last hours of their lives”,announces a narrator,foretelling the tradgady that unfolds as a war ravaged company of home army resistence fighters tries to escape the nazi onslaught through the sewers of warsaw.Determined to survive,the men and women slog through the hellish labyrinth,piercing the darkness with the strength of their individual spirits.
Based on true events,kanal was the first film ever made about the warsaw uprising and brought director Andrzej Wajda to international audiences.

Dennis Ross works for Zionist Israel for for American people.

If the latest events and the negative role of US diplomacy has shown anything it is that we can’t have the same US policies in regards to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

The news leaks that former Clinton advisor Dennis Ross might be getting the nod to be involved in the new administration as an advisor to the Middle East is certainly not the change that President elect Barack Obama promised during his election campaign.

The prevailing impression in the region and especially among Arabs is that, Dennis Ross was nothing more than a postman for the Israelis. On more than one occasion Arab negotiators have complained that Ross in his job as an American envoy was given them a carbon copy of documents or proposals that the Israelis had sent to their Arab interlocutor.

Perhaps Ross’s biggest problems happened after he left the White House as he led the, now disproven myth about what actually happened during the Barack-Arafat-Clinton Camp David talks in the last days of the Clinton administration. At that time Ross led the chorus of Israeli apologists placing all the blame for the failure of the talks on the Palestinian leader. Ironically, Ross, himself, was the person who convinced Arafat to go to Camp David after solemnly promising him that neither side will be publicly blamed if the talks fail. Palestinian president Arafat had told Ross that the time was not ripe for a summit but Ross, in connivance with Barack, attempted to railroad a bad deal down Arafat’s throat. Arafat who felt that the deal was very bad for Palestinians asked his US hosts if they can get the support of Arab leaders, they were unable to.

Dennis Ross’s lexicon is one reflection of his bias. In a speech he gave to the Seeds for Peace organization, last April, Ross refused to use the universally accepted word “occupation” in describing Israeli army’s presence in the Palestinian territories. Instead he used the word “Israeli control.”

After he left his job as senior Mideast negotiator continued to work and speak mostly on behalf on behalf of pro Israel Jewish organizations. If the US wants an honest broker, they can certainly find many other much more neutral and respected individuals to Arabs and Israelis including well qualified and politically honest and neutral American Jewish academics and diplomats.

America is poised on a new course when the champion of change, Barack Obama takes office on January 20th. Those who totally believe in a nonviolent solution to the Arab Israeli conflict and wish for true and lasting peace, wish on America’s new president to apply his change mantra to the position of his special advisor to the Middle East.
Daoud Kuttab

I went with two young women who have focused on Palestinian human rights, and were in Palestine last year doing work with youth to develop a creative and nonviolent response to the wall, and a third young woman who is learning about the situation much as I am.

One point of the conversation on the way to the rally focused on how, in the Geneva conventions, collective punishment is a war crime. The tactics used by Israel in response to the use of rockets by Hamas – sound bombs, blocking food and medical supplies into the area, and now days of air strikes – these are forms of collective punishment, effecting and killing children, women, civilians, elderly.

When we arrived to the area near the rally and memorial, the streets were lined with clusters of people. We met up at an Arab bakery, got warmed up. Whole families were in attendance, together. One of the women who’d been to Palestine last year says it was that way there, that you are expected to understand your political situation and be involved at any age.

As soon as we got to the actual rally, we saw sign with a shoe taped to it, one of the more humorous I’ve seen in a while. Most folks were holding Palestinian flags. There were chants – “Free, free Palestine!”, “1, 2, 3, 4 – Stop the Killing, Stop the War!!”, and “Muslims/People, United, Will Never Be Defeated” by a side group. Several chants were happening at a time, reminding me that its hard to be organized in grief, under attack. The waves of powerlessness keep you chaotic. We didn’t stay for very long, and I was overwhelmed by the need to do more, overwhelmed by the jaded tones of Palestinian voices knowing that it is too late, the blood is everywhere.

I don’t know how it feels to be Arab, seen as a terrorist monolith, with displacement and massacre of my people approved of by the major super powers of the world. It would seem that to be Palestinian, now, means that sophisticated technology is being used to build walls through your land, tear down your home, bomb and strike you; and if you respond with rockets, you are called a terrorist, and expendable.

I do know that the majority of people of color in the US came here either because they were stolen from their own lands and brought to work here, or displaced from their homelands by war, poverty or persecution, and driven to be in this space. Many of us had our cultures erased or diluted in this process, and have forgotten what it means to be connected to the ancestral land of our people. I can’t overemphasize the depth of this loss of culture and place; I know it makes it hard for many people in the U.S. to even understand the displacement that has been happening in Israel-Palestine since 1948.

I know that most of the people I surround myself with every day look back on the massacres of Native Americans as a point of irreconcilable grief and shame in the founding of the U.S. It is not enough to say it was sad but oh well, that’s how history progresses. It’s the part of history that keeps us from the future we want. The cowboys vs. indians games many of us were taught to play as children are fabled re-imaginings of colonization, much like the current heroes vs. terrorist stories being presented today around the world, amplified in Israel and the US. It is shameful, and sensational.

How many times must we allow the same thing to happen before we learn no good can come of it?

We get to a point like this when we look at history in a shallow way, or in a reactive way. It’s very hard, with the Holocaust of Jewish people in our recent collective history, to clearly see what is happening in Israel now. And yet, this is very clearly a cycle of trauma playing out – to avoid extinction, a campaign was launched for Israel as a place for a people without a place…unfortunately, the place was inhabited, and the struggle of those inhabitants with the growing settler population and expansion of Israel has been a bloody mess since then. In July 2008, Barack Obama (then a presidential candidate) voiced the key argument from the Israeli government – Hamas is firing rockets at civilian Israeli homes and they must defend themselves.

This is a short sighted analysis. The fact is that Palestinians have been under attack since 1948, attacks on their homes, farmland and right to exist. Their efforts to exist, to participate as a democratic society up against a force increasingly funded and armed by the U.S. has so far earned Palestinians no right to defend themselves. Palestinians, in response, democratically elect a body that promises to fight and defend their homeland. Ceasefires and negotiations are all shadowed by the constantly constructed Wall, the ongoing displacement and enclosure of Palestinian civilians, the growth of checkpoint culture, the denial of a right to return which would mean a right to truly coexist.

What is deeply needed is a truth and reconciliation process, with ownership taken on all sides. Instead, as is happening more and more with nations that obstruct the desires of the U.S. and its allies, the small and violent and desperate attempts at warfare (in reaction to extinction of their culture and people) by a smaller body are labeled terrorism, and they are marked for obliteration by a larger body that gets the OK to do so with the silence and lack of action by economic global partners. This happened in Germany during World War II, this happened during the founding of the U.S., this happened in South Africa during Apartheid.

Friends know that I tend to root (and organize and mobilize) for the underdog. But this has been hard to write about or maneuver, as I’ve had Jewish friends who I respect tell me I don’t understand, that it is more complicated than I am seeing. History is certainly overwhelmingly complex, and I don’t believe that good vs. evil is the way of the world – but I do believe that humans participate in evil actions, can slowly become complicit in evil policy, driven by fear.

It is beginning to feel, to me, that those friends of mine simply cannot accept the reality of what is being done in their name, by their families, by their people. I am an American citizen, it is hard to sleep knowing the things my country is doing around the world, and I work on many levels to change the course of this country, recognizing the privilege/responsibility of citizenship I was born into. As an American, I am part of the funding body of all that Israel does, and from that vantage point, this is not so complicated: Gaza is a massacre, checkpoints and walls and limiting medical and food supplies – these are signs that an apartheid is happening, and the Israeli government is evolving Zionism into something akin to an Afrikaner or even Nazi politic, even as thousands of people in Israel join hundreds of thousands around the world to protest this murderous direction.

The more that Palestinians are pushed against a wall, the less likely peace is possible.

The United Nations shares much of my analysis, perhaps as uselessly. Even President Jimmy Carter has referred to Israeli’s current political approach as apartheid. The governments of 3 countries (the US, Egypt, and Israel) are allowing this moment – having denied the Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere adequate food and medicine for months, largely impassable borders on both sides (Egypt’s government has held a closed border against the desires of it’s people), and now after rockets were fired – apparently more for prison break style attention than impact – it gives Israel the opportunity to obliterate these people, one walled prison at a time.

Many Palestinians in other parts of their homeland stay quiet, not wanting to bring the murderous eye onto them. The Palestinian rights activists I talk to are numb, bitter and hopeless; others of us try to rally something more than grief and confusion – wishing we could change the course of this.

As people of color who have our own various histories of resisting the erasure of our cultures from this planet against the spread of military-corporate assimilation, we must stand with the Palestinians, speak out, and take action. The anger and mourning we feel should drive us to break the cycle of domination vs. extinction. Fear, including the righteous fears of Jewish people who want to exist, and the righteous fears of Palestinians that they will be relegated to life in a walled prison and never allowed to be home – these fears are not going to create a world in which peace is possible. We must approach the Israeli people as brothers and sisters who have gone astray in the wake of their own trauma, help them to clean the blood from their hands, and come home to the human family.

I am including (click for more) the best piece I have read so far that frames the situation in Gaza, and encourage you to consider it and pass it along. I welcome thoughts and responses, welcome others to move out of silence!

Gaza and the Ghetto

In September 1939, Nazi Germany invaded Poland in what it termed initially a “defensive war”. The invasion was in part justified by the Nazi desire to reunify what it considered historic German territory and to claim Lebensraum for a race that considered itself superior to those that surrounded it in Central and Eastern Europe. Not only the Jews, but the Slavic races, were considered inferior, less than human, and regarded as populations that could be transferred to make room for Aryans.

It was, of course, the Jews who bore the brunt of Nazi racism. By 1940, the Nazis had begun to concentrate Poland’s Jewish population into ghettos in the main cities prior to their planned transport to the camps. In Warsaw, the largest of these ghettoes, three or four hundred thousand Jews were enclosed in less than 5% of the city, walled in by a 10-20 foot high wall, and gradually strangled by starvation and the shortage of all goods, including fuel and power. Malnutrition and disease was rampant and the exits and entrances of the ghetto were closely controlled. Resistance was subject to collective punishment: tens of Jews could be murdered in retaliation for the least act of defiance. In 1943, in the face of imminent transportation and the annihilation of the Jewish population, the remaining Jews in Warsaw organized combat brigades. The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising began. Despite the overwhelming force of the German Army and the utter inadequacy of their own weaponry, they fought a desperate struggle in the name not only of the Jews of Poland but of Poland’s right to resist fascism and occupation. “It is a fight”, they proclaimed to the Poles beyond the ghetto walls, “for our freedom, as well as yours; for our human dignity and national honour, as well as yours….”

An inspiration to resistance movements throughout Europe, the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising is remembered less as a lost cause than as the heroic struggle that it was. Though crushed by German armour and military power, in hand-to-hand and street-to-street fighting, the Jewish resistance in Warsaw stands as a symbol of the right of an oppressed people to resist occupation, collective punishment, genocide and ethnocide.

Yet imagine if the policy of appeasement had continued and Nazi Germany had made good its claim to occupy land that it considered part of the historic homeland of its people. Suppose Poland had gradually been settled, as was planned, with German families who might for the most part have desired to make peaceful and prosperous lives for themselves on the new lands they believed were rightfully theirs. Suppose Pearl Harbour had never happened, and the United States had not entered the war against the Axis powers: France and Britain would have concluded some form of peace with Hitler’s Germany, probably on the face-saving pretext of fighting a global war against Soviet communism, while the small nations of Eastern Europe would have been abandoned to their fate. Germany, instead as being seen as a nation of Nazis and war criminals, would have been understood as the bulwark of Europe’s defense against the Soviet Union, while the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto and the Polish resistance that supported them would have been remembered, if at all, as the “bandits” that the German generals knew them as. History, as we know, is rewritten by the victors.

Gaza too is a ghetto. One and a half million Palestinians, most of them refugees dispossessed of the lands and homes that were theirs for centuries, inhabit the most densely populated square miles of the Middle East if not the world. They are hemmed in by security walls and barbed wire fences, unable to move in or out without the permission of Israel, the occupying power. They have lived in a permanent state of siege, unable to conduct free trade with the rest of the world, virtually unable to visit the West Bank, unable even to fish in the sea off their coasts, subject to perpetual surveillance and control by land, sea and air. Their hospitals lack even the most essential medicines; power and water are controlled by the Israeli government; all goods that enter or leave this virtual prison camp do so by permission of the occupying power. The siege of Gaza has been one long collective punishment inflicted upon the population for their temerity in having elected, in free and open elections, a party, Hamas, that Israel and their ally, the United States and European Union, condemn as terrorists. Their principal crime is to deny the right to exist of a state that has dispossessed their people, occupied their lands, denied their historical existence, subjected them to ethnic cleansing, torture and collective imprisonment, destroyed their olive groves, walled them in behind a “security fence” designed to impede movement and access to farm land, schools, universities and places of work. And all these measures have been openly declared, by an Israeli minister in government, to be designed to suffocate Gaza into submission.

All this, the siege and its terrible effects on a civilian population struggling to survive in the most inhuman conditions imaginable, was ongoing before the current Israeli assault on the population of Gaza, its police force as well as old people and school children, infants and invalids. This is not an act of “defense” on the part of Israel, but a bloody continuation of a war of offense, differing only in the intensity and publicness of its brutality and in its abrupt, bloody and systematic nature. It is a war of collective punishment against a population whose resistance is less in its occasional and mostly harmless retaliatory rocket attacks than in its simple refusal to give in. It is an offensive war, like the 2006 and 1982 wars against Lebanon, and against a people whose right to resist occupation is inscribed in international law. It is a war whose crimes—once again–include the indiscriminate, because inevitable and foreseen, slaughter of civilians, including infants and children, attacks on non-military institutions including mosques, a university and a television station, and the deliberate planning of an assault whose proclaimed ends far exceed the suppression of the purported casus belli, the rocket launching sites. It is a war designed to destroy the civil infrastructure of Hamas and to break the will of the Palestinians in Gaza to continue their resistance.

The right of the Palestinian people to resist is as indubitable as the right of the Jews of Warsaw to resist the Nazis, or of the Polish or French people to fight against their occupation by the Nazis. Israel is not the West’s proxy in the so-called global war against terrorism. It is a state that itself inflicts terror, and does so with a force and brutality far exceeding anything available to the most violent of terrorist organizations. It is a state whose colonial aim, to occupy and to settle land historically occupied by another people in order to provide unlimited Lebensraum for its own ethnic group, is evidenced every day in the continuing expansion of the illegal settlements on the West Bank. It is an apartheid state, whose self-declared constitution as a “Jewish State for a Jewish People” should have no more international legitimacy than South Africa’s “white state for a white people” or Northern Ireland’s “Protestant State for a Protestant people”, both of which finally fell to a combination of military and civil resistance and international opprobrium.

It is long beyond time for Israel, now the exception in every respect among nations, to be held accountable to the norms of international law. It is time for Israel to be subjected to the same scrutiny as any other state that bases its polity on sectarianism and racism, that has established one set of laws for one ethnic group and another for the rest. It is time for Israel to by judged by the international law that everywhere condemns extended occupation, condemns collective punishment, war against civilians, population transfers or ethnic cleansing, dispossession of the occupied people and the settlement of their lands. It is time for us to name Israel what it is so long as it continues to pursue the most extreme of Zionist visions: a colonial, apartheid state with neither legitimacy nor a deserved place among the community of democratic nations.

It is time for us to cease the appeasement of Israel. Even the most ardent of appeasers of Nazi Germany never supplied Germany with arms or foreign aid, with fighter planes with which to bomb civilians, never labeled the resistance to Nazism “terrorism”, never actively participated in the German stranglehold on the ghettoes where it confined its subject populations. “Constructive engagement” did not work with South Africa; numerous U.N. General Assembly resolutions that have expressed the virtually unanimous international condemnation of Israel’s occupation of Palestine and its wars against its neighbors have not worked. It is time for the truth about Israel to be disseminated, even against the most effective control of the western media by Israel’s lobbyists. It is time for all who care about justice and peace, for human rights, for the fate of the innocent and the oppressed, the stateless and the dispossessed, make our voices heard. Let it not be said that in their most extreme hour of need, the Palestinian people were abandoned by the world, as the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto were abandoned in 1943.

David Lloyd,
Los Angeles,
December 30, 2008

International Powers Condemn Israel’s Offensive on Gaza

GAZA, December 27, 2008 (WAFA)- The lethal Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip, which resulted in more than 225 Palestinian citizens martyrs and 700 injured, has faced international condemnations.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called, Saturday, for an immediate halt of violence, and condemned excessive use of force leading to civilian casualties.

Ban said, in a statement issued by his spokesperson, that he is ‘deeply alarmed’ by the heavy violence and bloodshed in Gaza, and the continuation of violence in southern Israel, and called for ‘an immediate halt to all violence.’

Meanwhile, the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, said that he is ‘deeply concerned’ over the Israeli air strikes that have killed more than 225 Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip.

‘Israel needs to meet its humanitarian obligations, act in a way to further the long-term vision of a two-state solution, and do everything in its power to avoid civilian casualties,’ said the prime minister.

In Paris, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for an immediate halt to the violence in the Gaza Strip and Israel, a statement from the presidential Elysee Palace said.

Russia considered it necessary to stop large-scale military action against Gaza, which has already led to major casualties and suffering among the civilian Palestinian population, according to a statement by Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Middle East envoy Tony Blair deplored the ‘tragic of loss of life’, and urged a ‘new strategy for Gaza, which brings that Territory back under the legitimate rule of the Palestinian Authority in a manner which ends their suffering.’

Joining a chorus of international criticism against Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip, Switzerland condemned Saturday’s attacks on Gaza City and described it as ‘excessive.’

Raport biskupa kieleckiego Czesława Kaczmarka przekazany ambasadorowi USA w Warszawie Arthurowi Bliss Lane’owi

/1946 wrzesień – 06, Kielce/
Zajścia kieleckie z dnia 4 lipca 1946 r.
WstępW dn. 4 lipca 1946 r. zaszedł w Kielcach fakt zamordowania 39 Żydów i 2 Polaków oraz poranienia 40 osób pochodzenia żydowskiego (liczba podawana przez urzędowy akt oskarżenia i przez prasę), mordowali mieszkańcy Kielc, akcja ich trwała zdaniem urzędowego aktu oskarżenia od godz. dziesiątej rano z przerwami do godziny prawie szóstej po południu. Cała polska prasa rządowa poświęciła temu faktowi mniejsze lub większe ustępy, zgodnym chórem stwierdzono, że chodziło tu o przygotowany przez organizacje podziemne, których nici sięgają aż generała Andersa, pogrom Żydów, że był to ruch o charakterze faszystowskim. Nikt jednak z tego obozu nie starał się o odpowiedź na pytanie, dlaczego ów “pogrom” trwał tak długo, nikt w prasie rządowej nie próbował przekonywająco wyjaśnić, dlaczego pogrom stał się możliwy w mieście wojewódzkim, w którym są silne oddziały milicji, służby bezpieczeństwa i wojska.
Przy uważnym czytaniu prasy rządowej czytelnikowi krytycznemu narzuca się szereg innych jeszcze pytań, powstaje mnóstwo niejasności, samo nawet ujęcie sprawy w prasie rządowej jest nieco dziwne. Mamy olbrzymie komentarze, o charakterze politycznym, powtarza się stale slogany o demokracji, faszyzmie, milczeniu kleru, półsłówkami lub jak najkrócej omawia się sam przebieg wypadków, zeznania świadków, nie wspomina o obronie, o zachowaniu się milicji, Urzędu Bezpieczeństwa, wojska itp.
Z lektury tej powstaje nieodparte wrażenie, że prasie rządowej chodzi nie tyle o wyjaśnienie konkretnego wypadku, jaki miał miejsce, ile raczej o jego wyzyskanie dla celów propagandowych, o użycie go jako argumentu wobec przeciwników ideowych w kraju i za granicą. W tych warunkach staje się koniecznością wyjaśnienie przyczyn, przebiegu i następstw zajść w Kielcach nie poprzez pryzmat korzyści, jaką ma z nich obóz rządzący w Polsce, lecz jedynie w imię prawdy, o ile da się ją tutaj uchwycić.
Opieramy się przede wszystkim na zeznaniach świadków naocznych, a nawet aktorów tej sprawy. Pochodzą oni z różnych sfer: inteligencja i ludzie prości, tacy, którzy nienawidzą Żydów i tacy, którym Żydzi są obojętni. Zeznania te nie były składane dla sądu, nie mają charakteru ani obrony, ani oskarżeń, robione były jako wspomnienia piszący lub mówiący zwykle nie wiedzieli, do jakiego celu mają one służyć. Opieramy się nadto na akcie oskarżenia, sporządzonym przez prokuratora Naczelnej Prokuratury Wojskowej 6 lipca 1946 r., na świadkach procesu i na prasie.
Geneza wypadków kieleckich 4 lipca 1946 r.Pierwsze pytanie, które się nasuwa przy omawianiu zajść kieleckich, to pytanie, dlaczego do nich doszło. Prasa rządowa podkreśla sadyzm zabijających i powtarza za aktem oskarżenia, że tłum był podjudzany przez “reakcyjnych” zbrodniarzy, przez podżegaczy, podobno nawet przez umundurowanych andersowców. Jest to tłumaczenie zbyt symboliczne. Polacy nie mają opinii sadystów, poza tym w świetle doświadczenia historycznego widać, że narody stają się sadystyczne dopiero po dłuższym przygotowaniu propagandowym. Z Niemców na przykład robiono sadystów przez dziesiątki, o ile nie setki lat. Odpowiedź na postawione tu pytanie utrudnia i to, że w Kielcach nie było przedtem żadnych wystąpień antyżydowskich, że mieszka tu ludność spokojna, bądź co bądź katolicka, że mordowali – według urzędowego aktu oskarżenia – nie jacyś rozgoryczeni życiem bezrobotni lub nędzarze, lecz przedstawiciele drobnego mieszczaństwa, ludzie biedni, ale nie nędzarze.
Bezpośrednią przyczyną zajść miało być według aktu oskarżenia i prasy opowiadanie 9-letniego Henryka Błaszczyka, którego jakoby Żydzi mieli zamknąć w piwnicy, z której uciekł. Błaszczyk miał opowiadać na ulicy, że Żydzi go chcieli zabić. Ale rzecz jasna, że samo to tylko opowiadanie nie mogło sprowokować tak okrutnego zachowania się tłumu. Dlaczego więc miało ono miejsce? Odpowiedź może być tylko jedna. Dlatego, że tłum nienawidzi Żydów. Ta nienawiść mogła sprawić, że uwierzono opowiadaniu chłopca, że stało się ono ostatnią kroplą, która spowodowała wylew tej nienawiści w formie niesłychanie drastycznej. Rzecz jasna, że nie czuje się nienawiści do ludzi obojętnych, nieszkodliwych, nienawidzi się tylko wrogów czy też tych, których się za wrogów uważa i to z przyczyn, jeśli chodzi o tłum, konkretnych, jasnych, wyraźnych.
W Kielcach przyczyny tej nienawiści były dwojakiego rodzaju. Jedne miały charakter ogólny, były jak gdyby koniecznym tłem dla przyczyny specyficznej, wzburzającej szczególnie szerokie masy. Zanim jednak przejdziemy do ich omówienia, musimy tu podkreślić bardzo ważne zjawisko. Oto po olbrzymich mordach Żydów w roku 1943 dokonywanych przez władze niemieckie w Polsce ówczesnej, a więc i w Kielcach, nie było wrogiego nastawienia do Żydów i nie było antysemityzmu. Wszyscy współczuli Żydom, nawet ich najwięksi wrogowie. Wielu Żydów ocalili Polacy, boć przecież bez pomocy polskiej nie ocalałby żaden. Ratowano ich, choć były za to surowe kary, aż do kary śmierci włącznie. Tak było w roku 1944 i na początku roku 1945.
Po wejściu wojsk sowieckich, po rozciągnięciu władzy rządu lubelskiego na całą Polskę, ten stan rzeczy zmienił się gwałtownie. Zaczyna się niechęć do Żydów, szerzy się szybko, ogarniając szerokie masy społeczeństwa polskiego – wszędzie, a więc i w Kielcach, Żydzi są nielubiani, a nawet znienawidzeni na całym obszarze Polski. Jest to zjawisko nieulegające najmniejszej wątpliwości. Nie lubią Żydów nie tylko ci Polacy, którzy nie należą do żadnej partii lub też są w opozycji, ale nawet wielu spośród tych, którzy oficjalnie należą do partii rządowych. Powody tej niechęci ogólnej są powszechnie znane, w każdym razie nie wynikają one ze względów rasowych.
Żydzi w Polsce są głównymi propagatorami ustroju komunistycznego, którego naród polski nie chce, który mu jest narzucany przemocą, wbrew jego woli. Każdy Żyd ma poza tym dobrą posadę lub nieograniczone możliwości i ułatwienia w handlu i przemyśle, Żydów jest pełno w ministerstwach, na placówkach zagranicznych, w fabrykach, urzędach, w wojsku i to wszędzie na stanowiskach głównych, zasadniczych i kierowniczych. Oni kierują prasą rządową, mają w ręku tak surową dziś w Polsce cenzurę, kierują urzędami bezpieczeństwa, dokonują aresztowań.
Niezależnie od szerzenia komunizmu, nie odznaczają się oni taktem, zwłaszcza w stosunku do ludzi o przekonaniach niekomunistycznych. Są często aroganccy i brutalni. Wielu z nich nawet nie pochodzi z Polski. Przybywszy z Rosji, słabo mówią po polsku, jeszcze słabiej orientują się w stosunkach polskich. Na podstawie powyższych powodów powiedzieć zatem można, że sami Żydzi ponoszą lwią część odpowiedzialności za nienawiść, jaka ich otacza. Przeciętny Polak sądzi (mniejsza o to, słusznie czy niesłusznie), że prawdziwymi i szczerymi zwolennikami komunizmu w Polsce są tylko Żydzi, bo olbrzymia większość komunistów Polaków – to zdaniem ogółu – ludzie interesu, bezideowi, którzy są komunistami tylko dlatego, że im się to sowicie opłaca.
Tak się przedstawia tło ogólne wypadków kieleckich. Omówienie tej sprawy jest dlatego ważne, że rzuca ona światło na zachowanie się milicji i wojska podczas zajść kieleckich.
Obok tej przyczyny działała jednak na masy w Kielcach przyczyna druga, którą by można nazwać bezpośrednią. Już na parę miesięcy przed dniem 4 lipca 1946 r. rozchodziły się po Kielcach wersje o ginięciu dzieci obu płci. Księża z parafii kieleckich byli od czasu do czasu proszeni przez stroskanych rodziców o ogłaszanie z ambon wezwań, by ci, którzy mogą udzielić informacji o pobycie dzieci, powiadomili o tym rodziców. Ogłoszenia takie umieszczano i na słupach. Nie była to jakaś propaganda, bo dzieci ginęły rzeczywiście. Parę wypadków znanych jest z całą pewnością. Szeroki ogół uważał, że sprawcami ich są Żydzi, którzy na dzieciach popełniają mord rytualny, toteż skargi rodziców dzieci wpływały bardzo podniecająco przeciwko Żydom, zwłaszcza na ludzi prostych. Te niewątpliwe fakty ginienia dzieci oburzały nawet wielu ludzi z inteligencji. Niektórzy z nich informowali na przykład piszącego, że Żydzi dokonują transfuzji krwi z dzieci, a ofiary, z których pobrano krew, mordują.
Fakty tu opisane były meldowane milicji, która jednak okazywała wobec nich zupełną obojętność, nie przeprowadzając śledztwa, ale i nie dementując otrzymanych wiadomości. Ta bezczynność władz policyjnych utwierdzała szerokie masy w przekonaniu, że Żydom w Polsce wszystko wolno, że wszystko może im uchodzić bezkarnie.
Urzędowy akt oskarżenia, a za nim prasa rządowa wiążą wypadki kieleckie z referendum odbytym 30 maja 1946 r. Istotnie wiadomy z relacji tysięcy i dziesiątków tysięcy ludzi fakt, że co najmniej 90% uprawnionych głosowało “nie”, a tymczasem władze rządowe ogłosiły, że było na odwrót, mógł wpłynąć na zwiększenie podniecenia mas ludowych, łatwiej ulegających podnietom uczuciowym. Nie wydaje się jednak, by ten czynnik odegrał poważniejszą rolę przyczynową w zajściach kieleckich.
Tenże akt oskarżenia, a za nim cała prasa rządowa piszą, bez żadnych dowodów co prawda, zupełnie gołosłownie, że “pogrom” ludności żydowskiej w Kielcach był specjalnie przygotowany przez WiN, NSZ i elementy wsteczne. Chodzi tu o dwie kwestie: specjalne przygotowanie pogromu i przygotowanie go przez WiN i NSZ. Tego wyjaśnienia zajść kieleckich przyjąć jednak nie można. Jest rzeczą znaną, zarówno z prasy z licznych procesów, jak i z opowiadań świadków, że organizacje podziemne rozporządzają sporą ilością broni wojskowej wszelkiego rodzaju, że potrafią staczać z komunistami prawdziwe bitwy. Jeżeli zatem one przygotowały i to specjalnie, a więc jako tako starannie wypadki kieleckie, to musieli brać w nich udział ludzie uzbrojeni i połowa przynajmniej Żydów padłaby od kul pistoletowych, wśród dowodów rzeczowych winny się znaleźć jakieś rewolwery czy pistolety automatyczne. Te rzeczy chyba nie ulegają wątpliwości. Prokurator rządowy, którzy tak dużo mówił o winie andersowców i NSZ, na pewno by i na mordowanie Żydów bronią tych czynników nie omieszkał zwrócić uwagę.Tymczasem jeden ze sprawozdawców procesu, niepodejrzany, bo piszący w gazecie komunistycznej, tak pisze o rozprawie sądowej: “Przed stołem sędziowskim postawiono stolik, na którym zostały złożone dowody rzeczowe: kamienie, cegły zbroczone krwią, kije, sztachety z płotów, rura od kaloryfera poplamiona krwią i rower damski”.
Potwierdzają to uczestnicy procesu sądowego, nawet prokurator w akcie oskarżenia mówi, że Żydzi byli “wyrzucani i wypychani”, gdzie rzucały się na nich grupy osób, masakrując ich “uderzeniami rur żelaznych, cegieł itp.”. Nie ma tu mowy o broni palnej, zatem gdzie dowody o specjalnym przygotowaniu tych zajść i o przygotowaniu ich przez NSZ czy WiN? Owszem, rzeczywiście 2/3 Żydów zostało zamordowanych bronią wojskową, ale nawet prokurator nie przypisał za to winy tym organizacjom. Dalej, aktem oskarżenia objęto 12 osób, tymczasem nawet tenże prokurator nie zarzucił ani jednej z tych osób przynależności do NSZ lub WiN.
Twierdzenie zatem aktu oskarżenia o przygotowaniu wypadków kieleckich przez te organizacje należy uznać z pozbawione jakichkolwiek dowodów. Chyba że chodzi o przygotowanie moralne, ale to przecie – w świetle tego, co powiedziano wyżej – byłoby niemożliwe, gdyby w masach nie było nienawiści do Żydów z innych powodów, już przedtem nagromadzonej. Akt oskarżenia podaje na dowód swej tezy tylko to, że w tłumie usłyszano okrzyki: “Bić Żydów, niech żyje rząd sanacyjny, niech żyje Anders i niech żyje [Fragment tekstu nieczytelny] Żydów”. Pierwszy z nich jest zrozumiały, bo nie tylko nawoływano do bicia, ale i bito naprawdę.
Drugi okrzyk jest już a priori zupełnie niemożliwy. Gdyby autor aktu oskarżenia był Polakiem, a przynajmniej jako tako orientował się w tym, co działo się w Polsce od roku 1939, to widziałby, jak jest niepopularny rząd sanacyjny i jeśli ktoś wzniósł taki okrzyk istotnie, to chyba dla zabawy lub po pijanemu, a w akcie oskarżenia nie wypadało tego powtarzać. Co ważniejsze jednak, to to, że nikt, absolutnie nikt ze świadków zajść kieleckich tych trzech ostatnich okrzyków nie słyszał, nawet podczas procesu zapytywani o to świadkowie faktowi temu przeczyli.
Dlatego z całą stanowczością trzeba stwierdzić, że aczkolwiek okrzyk: “niech żyje Anders” – byłby zupełnie zrozumiały ze względu na dużą popularność tego generała w Polsce, to jednak okrzyk ten wraz z drugim o rządzie sanacyjnym i o Hitlerze są po prostu wymysłem prokuratora, aczkolwiek powtórzyła ten fakt za nim prasa rządowa. Jest to kłamliwy trick propagandowy i nic więcej.
Akt oskarżenia mówi także, że “ustalono niezbicie, że wśród podżegaczy i zabójców znajdowali się nawet umundurowani andersowcy”. Chodzi tu chyba o żołnierzy, którzy wrócili z armii polskiej na Zachodzie, innych przecież mundurów nie ma. Ci istotnie mogli być w tłumie i mogli brać udział w zabijaniu, ale akt oskarżenia sam obala wypowiedziane tu twierdzenie, jeżeli bowiem prokurator twierdzi, że coś ustalił “niezbicie”, to daje na to dowody albo na podstawie zeznań oskarżonych, tymczasem – to dziwne – żadnego umundurowanego andersowca nie aresztowano, albo na podstawie zeznań świadków, tymczasem i tych nie zacytowano. I to zdanie zatem należy uznać za niezgodny z prawdą wymysł aktu oskarżenia, przeznaczony chyba dla własnych zwolenników i dla zagranicy. Tak się przedstawia tło i przyczyny pośrednie zajść kieleckich w dniu 4 lipca.

Sprawa Henryka Błaszczyka, bezpośredniego sprawcy zajść kieleckich
Nie mamy zamiaru opisywać szczegółowo wypadków dnia 4 lipca, bo nie chodzi nam o to, którego Żyda w jakim czasie zamordowano. Przedstawienie tak dokładne byłoby niemożliwe, gdyż nie rozporządzamy odpowiednim materiałem dowodowym. Zresztą czynów tłumu, dokonywanych często równocześnie w paru naraz miejscach, odtworzyć się nie da. Tu zeznania świadków są i muszą być chaotyczne. Toteż ograniczymy się tylko do tego, co z tych zeznań da się wydobyć niewątpliwie, a co dotyczy rzeczy dla nas istotnej. Należą do nich trzy sprawy: początek zajść, główne fazy i kto mordował. Te trzy zagadnienia dadzą się wyjaśnić z całą pewnością.
Początek zajść wiąże się z osobą 9-letniego chłopca Henryka Błaszczyka.
Według urzędowego aktu oskarżenia i prasy rządowej sprawa ta przedstawiała się następująco: w dniu 1 lipca chłopiec znikł “w nieustalonych na razie okolicznościach” z domu rodzicielskiego. “W toku śledztwa niezbicie ustalono”, mówi tenże akt, że “chłopak znalazł się w odległej o 25 km od Kielc wsi Pielaki powiatu końskie i tu przebywał kolejno u trzech gospodarzy. W tym samym czasie na terenie Kielc rozpuszczono pogłoski o ginięciu dzieci, uprowadzanie których przypisywane było Żydom. W dniu 3 lipca wieczorem chłopiec powrócił do domu. Później, podczas procesu, ojciec chłopaka zeznawał, że nie pytał syna o to, gdzie był, lecz kazał mu się udać na spoczynek. Zainteresował się jednak tą sprawą sąsiad, a wtedy chłopiec – wracam do urzędowego aktu oskarżenia – “opowiedział wyuczoną i nieodpowiadającą prawdzie historię, jakoby spotkał na ulicy jakiegoś nieznajomego mężczyznę, który dał mu do niesienia paczkę i 20 zł na drogę. Mężczyzna jakoby zaprowadził go do domu zamieszkanego przez Żydów, gdzie odebrano mu paczkę i pieniądze, a jego samego wsadzono do małej i ciemnej piwniczki, nie dając mu jedzenia. Z piwnicy wydostał się on podobno potem przy pomocy jakiegoś chłopca, który podał mu przez okienko stołek, na który wszedłszy, uciekł oknem.
Rodzice chłopca na [podstawie] takiej opowieści, podmówieni przez osoby postronne, ustalone w śledztwie, tego samego dnia wieczorem zameldowali o tym Milicji Obywatelskiej, a wersję o zatrzymaniu i powrocie chłopca szerzono celowo po mieście. Rano dnia następnego rodzice chłopca, podmówieni, poszli znów z chłopcem na milicję, prowadząc go przez most i opowiadając o wypadku znajomym. Chłopak po drodze wskazał dom przy ul. Planty 7, gdzie rzekomo go więziono, i pokazał pierwszego napotkanego przypadkowo Żyda jako na sprawcę tego. W tym samym czasie na ul. Planty gromadził się już tłum. Po przyjściu rodziców z chłopakiem na komisariat MO wysłany został patrol 6 milicjantów celem ujęcia rzekomo podejrzanego osobnika, który na skutek wskazania chłopca został ujęty i osadzony w komisariacie MO.
Z komisariatu MO powtórnie wysłano patrol złożony z kilkunastu milicjantów celem przeprowadzenia rewizji i ustalenia miejsca, gdzie podobno miał siedzieć zatrzymany chłopak. Doraźne dochodzenie milicji ustaliło natychmiast ponad wszelką wątpliwość, że oświadczenia chłopaka są fałszywe i zmyślone, niemniej jednak podburzony tłum, widząc chłopaka i ulegając szerzonej przez agitatorów propagandzie, rozpoczął pogrom Żydów zamieszkałych przy ul. Planty nr 7″.Tyle urzędowy akt oskarżenia. Moglibyśmy go uznać za prawdziwy opis początków wypadków, gdyby nie to, że jego analiza wywołuje pewne co do tego wątpliwości i gdyby nie sam proces sądowy, który wątpliwość tę jeszcze pogłębia.
Akt oskarżenia mówi, że chłopiec znikł 1 lipca “w nieustalonych na razie okolicznościach”. Akt oskarżenia jest datowany 8 lipca, w chwili gdy to piszemy, jest 1 września, a zatem od 4 lipca upłynęło blisko już 2 miesiące. Prasa rządows codziennie prawie porusza wypadki kieleckie, a jednak do tej pory władze rządowe nie kwapią się z ogłoszeniem tych okoliczności, choć jest to sprawa niezwykle doniosła. Nie mógł ich ustalić i prokurator, choć miał na to 4 dni czasu, a ściśle biorąc, nie powinien był się zgodzić na sporządzanie aktu oskarżenia, dopóki nie miał pełnego materiału dowodowego. Jeżeli chłopiec 1 lipca opuścił dom i udał się do wsi Pielaki, to mógł to zrobić z następujących powodów: albo uciekł z domu na skutek złego traktowania, albo urządził sobie wycieczkę samowolnie, bez wiedzy rodziców, albo został do tego przez kogoś namówiony. Jest rzeczą dziwną, że nie udało się wydobyć od chłopca odpowiedzi na te pytania. Ale największej wątpliwości dostarczył sam proces sądowy. Urzędowy akt oskarżenia mówi, że chłopiec opowiadał “wyuczoną i nieodpowiadającą prawdzie historię” o przetrzymywaniu go przez Żydów.
Wiceminister bezpieczeństwa publicznego Wachowicz opowiedział to przedstawicielowi SAP-u w sposób bardziej szczegółowy: “Dziecko wzięte na spytki przez dwie godziny powtarzało wyuczoną lekcję o Żydach i więzieniu, zamierzonym morderstwie itp. w obawie, że jeśli powie prawdę, zostanie ukarane przez rodziców. Po dwóch godzinach dziecko przyznało się do prawdy i wyszły na jaw szczegóły tej potwornej prowokacji, do której zdegenerowani przestępcy nie zawahali się użyć naiwnego dziecka”.
Otóż chłopiec ten był w świetle urzędowego aktu oskarżenia bezpośrednim i głównym sprawcą wypadków kieleckich dnia 4 lipca. Nie ulega najmniejszej wątpliwości, że on przede wszystkim powinien był być badany podczas procesu sądowego. Tymczasem w dniu 8 lipca na rozprawę sądową nie dostarczono go. Najważniejszy świadek oskarżenia był na procesie nieobecny, choć władze rządowe miały go w rękach. A przecież jeśli prawdą jest to, co podawał wiceminister Wachowicz, zeznania chłopca byłyby jak najlepszym argumentem na korzyść tezy wysuwanej przez akt oskarżenia. Komu zależało i na tym, by nie zeznawał w sądzie, by nie pokazał się obrońcom i publiczności?
Fakt, że Henryka Błaszczyka, głównego sprawcę zajść kieleckich, badał tylko prokurator, że jego zeznań nikt potem nie słyszał, że obrońcy nie mogli go pytać i nie widzieli nawet, podważa wybitnie prawdziwość urzędowego aktu oskarżenia.
Ale to nie koniec wątpliwości. Zaraz 4 lipca chłopca wraz z ojcem aresztowano i nie pozwolono nikomu się z nim widzieć. Siedzi on w więzieniu aż dotąd. Jeżeli po pewnym czasie nie zostanie on wypuszczony na wolność, ew[entualnie] oddany do jakiegoś domu poprawczego, lecz zaginie w więzieniu, to wówczas będzie wolno wyprowadzić z tego tylko jeden wniosek, a mianowicie, że prawdziwe zeznania chłopca były inne niż podawał urzędowy akt oskarżenia i że władze rządowe obawiały się, by chłopiec nie powiedział w sądzie co innego, niż one sobie życzyły.
Jeszcze jedna sprawa niejasna. Młody Błaszczyk wskazał na osobnika, który jakoby zaprowadził go do domu zamieszkanego przez Żydów. Osobnik ten został ujęty i osadzony w komisariacie. Tyle tylko mówił urzędowy akt oskarżenia na ten temat, nie podaje on nawet, jak się ów osobnik nazywał i kim był. Sprawę widocznie zbagatelizowano, choć była ona jedną z głównych przyczyn wypadków kieleckich. I znowu pytanie: dlaczego owego osobnika nie skonfrontowano w sądzie z Henrykiem Błaszczykiem, by temu ostatniemu dowieść kłamstwa? Dlaczego z góry, bez możności sprawdzenia tego przez adwokatów, przyjęto dziwną perwersję chłopca, który wskazał na pierwszego lepszego spotkanego po drodze Żyda?
Niektórzy świadkowie mówią, i powtórzył to za nimi jeden z korespondentów pism zagranicznych, że Żyd ów nazywał się Antoni Pasowski. On to ich zdaniem wmówił w Błaszczyka, że Żydzi z domu Planty nr 7 chcieli go zamordować, a oprócz tego, sterroryzowawszy chłopca, kazał mu o tym opowiadać naokoło. Nie wiadomo dokładnie, na czym się ta wersja opiera, nie wydaje się ona jednak zmyślona, gdyż analiza wypadków raczej ją potwierdza niż podważa. Chłopiec musiał być przez kogoś namówiony do szerzenia opowiadania o postępowaniu Żydów. Sam nawet urzędowy akt oskarżenia nie mówi, że uciekł on z domu lub że zrobił samowolną wycieczkę, lecz że “znikł w nieustalonych na razie okolicznościach”. Ktoś mu w tym zniknięciu pomógł. A dalej, jeśli chłopca istotnie nie męczyli Żydzi, to ktoś mu również kazał opowiadać o tym. Gdyby opowiadanie chłopca było całkowicie przez niego zmyślone, to niewątpliwie pokazano by chłopca w procesie sądowym na dowód, że sam przyznaje, iż kłamał. Tego nie zrobiono widać w obawie, by się nie wsypał. A wobec tego, kto namówił chłopca do opowiedzenia całej tej historii? Mogli to zrobić jacyś reprezentanci WiN czy NSZ lub też, co a priori biorąc, wydaje się paradoksalnym, sami Żydzi. Pierwszą możliwość omówiliśmy w rozdziale poprzednim, wykazując, że jest ona nie do przyjęcia. Pozostaje zatem druga, choć wydaje się, że jest nieprawdopodobna i absurdalna, bo wynikałoby z niej, że Żyd był głównym sprawcą mordowania Żydów w Kielcach.
Czy jednak naprawdę jest ona absurdalna?
Przed daniem odpowiedzi na to pytanie trzeba wspomnieć o dwóch wiążących się z nim zjawiskach.
Po pierwsze faktem jest, że Żydzi europejscy pragną wywrzeć presję na rząd Wielkiej Brytanii, by oddał im w niepodzielne władanie Palestynę. Niedawno dokonany przez terrorystów żydowskich zamach w Jerozolimie na hotel króla Dawida, podczas którego zginęło podobno sporo Żydów, jest wymownym dowodem tej presji.
Po drugie, aby łatwiej uzyskać możność wyjazdu do Palestyny, Żydzi europejscy starają się dowieść, że w niektórych krajach europejskich są prześladowani. Do takich krajów należy Polska, której Żydzi, zwłaszcza rosyjscy, szczególnie nie lubią za to, że nie chce dobrowolnie przyjąć narzucanego sobie ustroju komunistycznego.
Ze względu na przytoczone zjawiska nie jest wykluczone, że ktoś z Żydów mógł skłonić Henryka Błaszczyka do opowiadania wyżej przytoczonej historii w przewidywaniu, że skłoni ona podniecony już i tak przeciw Żydom tłum do ekscesów, które będzie można potem obszernie wyzyskać. W świetle tej hipotezy jasne jest i zniknięcie Błaszczyka na trzy dni (obojętne jest przy tym, czy był od 1 do 3 lipca na wsi, czy też w piwnicy przy ul. Planty 7), i niepokazanie go nawet podczas procesu. Potwierdza ją także w sposób silny fakt, że milicja nie próbowała przeszkodzić tłumom w mordowaniu, co wyjaśnić można w ten tylko sposób, że takie miała rozkazy. Poniżej przytoczymy jeszcze więcej danych na potwierdzenie wyrażonej tu supozycji.
I wreszcie jedna jeszcze uwaga. Urzędowy akt oskarżenia twierdzi, że w czasie między 1 a 3 lipca rozpuszczono w Kielcach pogłoski o ginięciu dzieci. Twierdzenie to jest niezgodne z prawdą, bo wiadomości o ginieniu dzieci kursowały po Kielcach już wcześniej, jak o tym była mowa w rozdziale pierwszym. W czasie od 1 do 3 lipca świeżych na ten temat pogłosek, poza osobą Błaszczyka, nie było.
Tyle urzędowy akt oskarżenia. Moglibyśmy go uznać za prawdziwy opis początków wypadków, gdyby nie to, że jego analiza wywołuje pewne co do tego wątpliwości i gdyby nie sam proces sądowy, który wątpliwość tę jeszcze pogłębia.

Przebieg zajść
Tyle urzędowy akt oskarżenia. Moglibyśmy go uznać za prawdziwy opis początków wypadków, gdyby nie to, że jego analiza wywołuje pewne co do tego wątpliwości i gdyby nie sam proces sądowy, który wątpliwość tę jeszcze pogłębia.
Urzędowy akt oskarżenia, a za nim prasa rządowa, opisuje początek i przebieg zajść kieleckich w trzech zdaniach: z komisariatu milicji wysłano kilkunastu milicjantów, którzy mieli sprawdzić, czy Błaszczyk był rzeczywiście przetrzymywany w domu Planty nr 7; po przybyciu na miejsce dochodzenie milicji “ustaliło natychmiast ponad wszelką wątpliwość”, że oświadczenie chłopca jest fałszywe i zmyślone, “niemniej jednak podburzony tłum, widząc chłopaka i ulegając szerzonej przez agitatorów propagandzie, rozpoczął pogrom Żydów zamieszkałych przy ul. Planty 7″.
Tyle ów akt urzędowy. Nie odpowiada on wcale na dwa budzące się przy tym pytania: w jaki sposób milicja ustaliła “ponad wszelką wątpliwość”, że chłopiec mówił nieprawdę? Czy badano piwnicę domu i przesłuchiwano zamieszkałych w nim Żydów? I drugie pytanie: dlaczego milicjanci nie powstrzymali tłumów, choć było ich kilkunastu i choć akcja odbywała się na schodach, gdzie z braku miejsca tłum nie mógł być duży?
Te pytania okażą się zbędne, jeżeli przedstawi się przebieg tej sprawy ze szczegółami, które urzędowy akt oskarżania prawdopodobnie celowo przemilcza.
Wszyscy świadkowie zeznają zgodnie, że wypadki zaczęły się około godz. 10. Do domu przy ul. Planty 7 przybył w towarzystwie tłumu mały oddział milicji, który zażądał otwarcia drzwi mieszkania na pierwszym piętrze w celu przeprowadzeniu w nim rewizji. Żydzi odmówili, mówiąc, że otworzą tylko na rozkaz UB, to jest Urzędu Bezpieczeństwa. Ta odmowa rozjątrzyła zarówno milicjantów, jak i tłum, gdyż UB jest to organizacja analogiczna do niemieckiej Gestapo i kierowana przez Żydów.
Wyglądało na to, że Żydzi chcą się tylko przed Żydami tłumaczyć, że nie mają zaufania do polskich milicjantów. Zgromadzony przed domem tłum szemrał, nastrój podniecały kobiety, między innymi jedna z nich, która zawodziła głośno: “Moja droga dziecina… Tu ją zamordowali”. Kobiecie tej rzeczywiście musiało zaginąć dziecko. Ktoś z tłumu, w cywilnym ubraniu, rzucił z ulicy kamieniem w szybę mieszkania żydowskiego, za tym posypały się inne kamienie. Wobec tego milicjanci znajdujący się na ulicy zaczęli nawoływać do spokoju, a jeden z nich czy też paru strzeliło w górę dla postrachu. Jedna z kul oderwała gzyms nad oknem mieszkania żydowskiego. Wśród tłumu zaczął się popłoch. I wtedy właśnie dano serię strzałów z okien domu zamieszkanego przez Żydów. Parę osób zostało rannych. Tłum zaczął uciekać, po chwili jednak zawrócił, gdy strzały umilkły.
To działo się na ulicy. Tymczasem w samym domu milicja wyważyła [drzwi] mieszkania na pierwszym piętrze, ale gdy drzwi zawaliły się pod naporem cisnących, posypała się nań seria strzałów. Zostało rannych parę osób i zabity jakiś oficer. Atakujący wycofali się z części schodów.
Fakt ten, że Żydzi zaczęli pierwsi strzelać do milicji i tłumu, nie ulega najmniejszej wątpliwości. Stwierdzają to wszyscy bez wyjątku świadkowie. Pierwszymi ofiarami podczas zajść kieleckich byli zatem Polacy. Nawiasem mówiąc, posiadanie broni palnej jest w Polsce zakazane pod karą śmierci. Te strzały żydowskie sprowokowały dalszy bieg wypadków. Gdyby nie one, skończyłoby się prawdopodobnie wszystko na wybiciu szyb Żydom i milicjanci potrafiliby uchronić ich od linczu. Zaatakowani milicjanci odpowiedzieli jednak strzałami i zamiast rozpędzać tłum, stanęli po jego stronie. Świadkowie mówią, że wewnątrz domu Żydzi bronili się i granatami.
Na ulicy przed domem stał tłum coraz gęstszy. Około godz. 10 min. 30 na ulicy zjawili się funkcjonariusze służby bezpieczeństwa, ale zachowali się biernie, przyjmując tylko postawę obserwatorów. Zjawił się też silny oddział wojska i zaczął otaczać dom, usuwając z ulicy tłumy. Obserwatorzy stwierdzają, że był wówczas moment, gdy można było zlikwidować całe zajście, gdyby ze strony służby bezpieczeństwa padły odpowiednie po temu rozkazy, gdyby ktoś z nich wykazał należytą energię, gdyby służba bezpieczeństwa, milicja i wojsko chciały rzeczywiście działać. Tymczasem milicja i żołnierze prowadzili głośne rozmowy z tłumem. Widać było, że wojsko zwłaszcza podziela nienawiść do Żydów. Z tłumu wołano zresztą: “Niech żyje armia polska!”.
Jeden ze świadków naocznych opowiadał, że jeden z oficerów usłyszawszy, że Żydzi mordują “naszych”, wyciągnął rewolwer i pobiegł do wnętrza domu. Tam również udała się i część żołnierzy. Milicjanci i żołnierze mordowali Żydów w mieszkaniach lub też bijąc ich kolbami, wyprowadzali na ulicę, a tu w obecności innych żołnierzy i milicjantów masakrowały ich zhisteryzowane jednostki. Nawet przewód sądowy stwierdził, że 2/3 Żydów zginęło z ran postrzałowych, a tylko 1/3 została zamordowana przez jednostki z motłochu. Funkcjonariusze Urzędu Bezpieczeństwa i teraz zachowywali się bezczynnie…
Gdyby Żydzi nie bronili się w swych mieszkaniach, byliby wymordowani lub pobici w ten sposób wszyscy w ciągu godziny. Tymczasem toczyła się walka o każde mieszkanie i powtarzało się zabijanie ich lub wywlekanie na ulicę.Około godz. drugiej po południu zaczęła się druga faza zajść. Przyszli tłumem, przebywając przestrzeń około kilometra, a jednak nie powstrzymywani przez nikogo po drodze robotnicy z fabryki “Ludwików” i z tartaku państwowego, uzbrojeni w drągi, klucze francuskie itd. Robotnicy ci należą prawie wyłącznie do dwóch partii rządowych, PPR i PPS. Zaczęło się jeszcze szybsze wyciąganie Żydów z domów i mordowanie ich na miejscu lub na ulicy, która została zasiana trupami. Dopiero po południu, około godziny trzeciej, tłum, nie mając już nic do roboty, zaczął się rozchodzić, atakując tu i ówdzie napotkanych po drodze Żydów. Stwierdza to i akt oskarżenia, pozwalając jednak w ten sposób na wniosek, że skoro zajścia trwały tak długo, to wynika z tego alternatywa: albo władze nie chciały przerwać mordowania Żydów, albo nie zostały usłuchane przez własnych ludzi. Jeśli przyjąć ten drugi wniosek, to wynika z niego inny. Widać mianowicie, jaki posłuch w wojsku, a nawet w milicji ma rząd obecny i jak wielka jest w masach nienawiść do głównych tego rządu zwolenników, tj. do Żydów.
Tyle urzędowy akt oskarżenia. Moglibyśmy go uznać za prawdziwy opis początków wypadków, gdyby nie to, że jego analiza wywołuje pewne co do tego wątpliwości i gdyby nie sam proces sądowy, który wątpliwość tę jeszcze pogłębia.

Proces sądowyTyle urzędowy akt oskarżenia. Moglibyśmy go uznać za prawdziwy opis początków wypadków, gdyby nie to, że jego analiza wywołuje pewne co do tego wątpliwości i gdyby nie sam proces sądowy, który wątpliwość tę jeszcze pogłębia.
Piętą achillesową urzędowego przedstawienia wypadków kieleckich jest niewątpliwie proces sądowy w tej sprawie. Rzuca on cień na szczerość tych, którzy go prowadzili i zdradza ich istotne tendencje. Do odpowiedzialności pociągnięto 12 osób, w tym tylko 6 spośród tych, którzy brali udział w zajściach. Jeśli się zwróci uwagę na to, że zamordowanych było 39 osób, a ranionych 40, to liczba oskarżonych jest wysoce niewspółmierna do liczby zabitych i rannych. Prokurator rządowy jednak inaczej postąpić nie mógł, gdyż istotnie spośród osób cywilnych zabijających było niewielu, 2/3 Żydów wymordowali i poranili milicjanci, żołnierze i robotnicy, a tych jako ludzi rządowych do odpowiedzialności prokurator pociągnąć nie chciał.
Na proces przyjechał najwyższy sąd wojskowy, choć według prawa nie jest on kompetentny do sądzenia spraw w pierwszej instancji ani do sądzenia spraw osób cywilnych, o ile ich czyn nie pozostaje w bezpośrednim związku z przestępstwem osób wojskowych. Władzom rządowym chodziło, zdaje się, o dobór takich sędziów, którym by można było zaufać. Byli też nimi niejacy Marian Barton, Antoni Łukasik i Stanisław Baraniuk.
Pierwszy z nich miał wybitne cechy mongolskie, nie wyglądał na Polaka, dwaj pozostali mieli wygląd semicki. Innym zupełnie dziwnym pogwałceniem prawa był fakt, że o zajściach w dniu 4 lipca nie powiadomiono wcale prokuratora miejscowego, nie on też oskarżał przed tym sądem, lecz również specjalnie przysłany prokurator sądu najwyższego major Szponderski oraz miejscowy prokurator sądu wojskowego, Żyd Golczewski. Do obrony powołano z urzędu pięciu adwokatów, w tym tylko dwóch obrońców wojskowych, trzech zaś cywilnych. Gdy ci ostatni podnieśli zarzut, że nie są kompetentni do stawania w sądach wojskowych, sąd odpowiedział, że istotnie mógłby wyznaczyć na obrońców nawet żołnierzy, ale kieruje się dobrem oskarżonych.
Nawiasem mówiąc, spośród tych trzech obrońców cywilnych jeden z nich, Zenon Wiatr, jest znany jako żyjący b[ardzo] dobrze z kołami PPR, w ten sposób dwaj pozostali byli zmajoryzowani. Rola ich była tym trudniejsza, że nie występowali nigdy w sądach wojskowych, a co więcej, ze sprawą nie zdążyli się nawet zapoznać. Oto 8 lipca po południu zawiadomiono ich, że mają występować w sprawie zajść kieleckich dnia następnego o godzinie dziewiątej rano. W ten sposób nie dano im nawet 24 godzin do przygotowania obrony, co więcej, uniemożliwiono im porozumienie z oskarżonymi. Na widzenie się z tymi ostatnimi dano im dosłownie niecałą godzinę czasu i to bezpośrednio przed samym procesem, gdy na dyskusje, na przygotowanie wspólnej linii postępowania ławy obrończej, a nawet na dokładne zapoznanie się z aktem oskarżenia było już stanowczo za późno. Zresztą akt oskarżenia przeczytano podsądnym dopiero na godzinę przed zaczęciem rozprawy, wbrew kodeksowi postępowania karnego wojskowego, który daje oskarżonym 5 dni czasu na wręczenia lub odczytania aktu oskarżenia do rozprawy, wprawdzie podsądni podpisali oświadczenie, że zrzekają się tego przysługującego im okresu 5 dni, ale dziwne jest, że zgodzili się w ten sposób na utrudnienie zadania obrony, że nie porozumieli się w tej sprawie uprzednio z obrońcami, dziwniejsze, że zrobili to wszyscy, jeszcze dziwniejsze, że pozwolił na to sąd. Ten zupełnie niezrozumiały krok oskarżonych można wytłumaczyć jedynie tym, że tak im zrobić kazano i to prawdopodobnie w sposób, jaki jest praktykowany w polskich więzieniach. Jeden z oskarżonych miał świeże rany na głowie, inny wyraźnie powiedział na rozprawie, że go bito podczas śledztwa.
W procesie tym były jednak rzeczy jeszcze dziwniejsze. W ataku na Żydów brali udział i milicjanci, podczas zajść zabito paru Polaków (dwóch wylicza akt oskarżenia), którzy przecie nie padli z rąk polskich, a więc musieli być – sądząc nawet z aktu oskarżenia – zabici przez Żydów, wszyscy świadkowie stwierdzają, że pierwsi zaczęli strzelać do Polaków Żydzi, poza tym zajściom towarzyszyło zrozumiałe podniecenie. To wszystko powinno było być wzięte w rachubę przez sąd i wyjaśnione, bo rzucało światło na sprawę. Działanie w afekcie zawsze zmniejsza winę, zwłaszcza wtedy, gdy przestępca jest jednym z tłumu przestępczego, gdy jest przez tenże podniecany, niejako zachęcany. Sąd jednak z góry zastrzegł, że tych rzeczy poruszać obronie nie wolno. Obrońcy wiedzieli, co to znaczy, toteż ograniczyli się tylko do wysunięcia zarzutów natury czysto proceduralnej i do rzeczy drugorzędnych. Sąd nie zgodził się też na wysłuchanie świadków, których proponowali obrońcy.
Z tego wszystkiego widać, że sądowi chodziło tylko o demonstrację, o skazanie jak największe liczby ludzi, nie zaś o ustalenie istotnego przebiegu wypadków i w związku z tym prawdziwego stopnia winy oskarżonych.
Jeżeli urzędowy akt oskarżenia twierdzi, że w związku z osobą Błaszczyka tłum pod wpływem agitatorów rzucił się na niczego nieprzeczuwających, spokojnych mieszkańców domu przy ul. Planty 7, to jest zupełnie niezrozumiałe postępowanie sądu, bo przecież gdyby to było prawdą, to sąd nie zakazywałby prowadzenia tej sprawy, przeciwnie, położyłby na nią nacisk. Skoro jednak sąd nie dopuścił do rozprawy na temat początku zajść, to znaczy, że [mu] na tym zależało, że miał w tym jakiś interes. A z tego wynika jednak, że urzędowe wyjaśnienie początku zajść nie odpowiadało prawdzie. Obawiano się niewątpliwie usłyszenia od świadków takich faktów jak ten, że Żydzi nie chcieli wpuścić do swego mieszkania milicjantów, że pierwsi zaczęli strzelać, prowokując w ten sposób milicję i tłum, oraz faktu, że większość Żydów została zamordowana przez milicjantów, żołnierzy i robotników i że milicjanci państwowi wywlekali Żydów z mieszkania i oddawali ich na pastwę rozwścieczonego tłumu.
Uderzają w tym procesie poza tym dwie jeszcze niezwykle ciekawe okoliczności. Pierwsza to wygląd oskarżonych i ich zeznania. Prawie wszyscy mieli wygląd ludzi przestraszonych, jeden z nich powiedział, że go bito w więzieniu, innemu, który chciał odwołać swe zeznania uczynione w śledztwie, prokurator groził, że spotka go… – choć, zorientowawszy się, nie dokończył zdania. Sprowadzony na rozprawę ojciec Błaszczyka wyglądał jak człowiek niezupełnie normalny, był mocno nastraszony. W zeznaniach swych większość oskarżonych przyznawała się do wszystkiego, niektórzy mówili więcej nawet na swoją niekorzyść, niż powiedzieli podczas śledztwa, a wszyscy podawali to, czego od nich żądano. Słowem był to typowy proces, taki, jakie się często odbywają na Wschodzie, a które są tajemnicze dla ludzi Zachodu.
Prokurator Golczewski w swym oskarżeniu obszernie opowiadał o faszyzmie i reakcji, choć na omówienie tła i początku zajść sąd nie pozwolił, ubliżał obrońcom, choć byli przecie naznaczeni z urzędu, obrzucał błotem patriotyzm i honor Polaków, choć to miało miejsce w polskim sądzie. Napadał na Kościół katolicki, choć przedstawicieli tego Kościoła nie pytali wcale, co sądzą o wypadkach kieleckich. Bez żadnego dowodu, bez przytoczenia choćby jednego świadectwa przyjął za pewnik, że chodziło o pogrom zorganizowany przez podżegaczy spod znaku Andersa i że tłum pierwszy wpadł na spokojnych, niewinnych Żydów. Sąd nie zajął się sprawdzeniem prawdy tych powiedzeń, nie przeprowadził na ten temat śledztwa, nie dopuścił proponowanych przez obronę świadków, odrzucił wszystkie wnioski obrony. Nie pozwolił na omawianie genezy zajść i udziału w nich milicji, bezpieczeństwa i wojska. Rozprawie nie przewodniczył żaden z sędziów, lecz sam prokurator udzielał głosu obrońcom i oskarżonym. Zamiast stwierdzić tylko winę oskarżonych, skoro na inne tematy mówić nie pozwolono, sąd w wyroku swym przyjął bez dowodu łączność zajść kieleckich z zagranicą, uznał wypadki za dzieło agentów generała Andersa. Zabawił się też w propagandę, twierdzącą, że Polska Ludowa musi walczyć z pozostałościami faszyzmu.
Fakt, że sąd przyjął za pewnik te rzeczy, co do których nie było żadnych absolutnie dowodów, których nawet nie pozwolił poruszać, wskazuje na to, że sąd ten działał na rozkaz z góry, że cały proces był tylko parodią. Sądowi nie chodziło widać o zbadanie przyczyn zbrodni, lecz o wyzyskanie jej dla celów propagandowych, o użycie jej na korzyść polityki rządu.
W związku z tym pozostaje druga ważna okoliczność. Wypadki kieleckie niezależnie od ich tła, niezależnie od tego, że były sprowokowane, niezależnie od tego, że władze rządowe mogły, lecz nie chciały do nich nie dopuścić, były jednak zbrodnią zostawiającą plamę na społeczeństwie polskim. Wiadomo było, że czynniki wrogie Polsce będą się starały atakować ją z tego powodu. Każdy uczciwy rząd polski, tak jak każdy rząd na świecie, z obowiązku starałby się przedstawić wypadki kieleckie jak najsumienniej, podać wszystkie okoliczności łagodzące, bo takie były niewątpliwie, zabijający w Kielcach nie byli przecież zawodowymi zbrodniarzami. W tym wypadku zaniechano tego jednak, a nawet z góry zabroniono poruszać te okoliczności łagodzące, nie dopuszczono do omawiania prawdziwego początku zajść, starając się w ten sposób o ułatwienie roboty czynników zohydzających społeczeństwo polskie. Sąd kielecki, odbyty w dniach 9-11 lipca, wykazał niezbicie, że tymczasowemu rządowi polskiemu chodziło o przedstawienie wypadków kieleckich z 4 lipca w świetle możliwie jak najgorszym.
Oprócz powyższych danych potwierdzeniem tego jest fakt, że rozprawie sądowej starano się nadać możliwie jak najsilniejszy rozgłos, że ściągnięto na nią nie tylko tłum sprawozdawców polskich pism rządowych, ale i sprawozdawców cudzoziemskich. Rząd nie miał czasu na to, by go udzielić obrońcom na zapoznanie się z materiałem oskarżenia, otrzymali tylko parę godzin, ale miał czas na zawezwanie i sprowadzenie całego tłumu korespondentów pism zagranicznych. Liczono widać na to, że nie znając stosunków polskich, a specjalnie kieleckich, nie zorientują się w tym, że proces był z góry wyreżyserowany, że usunięto zeń wszystko, co mogło być niewygodne rządowi, a pokazano tylko to, o co rządowi chodziło. Zdaje się, że zamiar ten na ogół się udał.

Prasa rządowa o wypadkach kieleckich.
Rola Kościoła
Prasa rządowa, a niestety także informowana przez nieuczciwych lub naiwnych korespondentów część prasy zagranicznej, zaczęła wyprowadzać z wypadków kieleckich następujące wnioski: Agenci faszystowscy, agenci generała Andersa organizują w Polsce pogromy Żydów. Ci, którzy nie chcą potępić wypadków kieleckich w ten sam sposób, jak to robi prasa rządowa polska, są związani z faszyzmem i z generałem Andersem. Takimi są w Polsce członkowie PSL Mikołajczyka i dlatego należy stronnictwo to rozwiązać.
Ponieważ zabijający Żydów w Kielcach byli katolikami i ponieważ Kościół katolicki nie chce również potępić wypadków kieleckich w sposób wymagany przez rząd, Kościół zatem odpowiada za te wypadki, jest antysemicki i faszystowski, dlatego też uzasadnione jest podjęcie z nim walki i osłabienia jego wpływów.
W społeczeństwie polskim jest jeszcze wiele wpływów faszystowskich, czego dowodem jest okazany w Kielcach antysemityzm, a zatem całkowicie uzasadnione jest postępowanie tymczasowego rządu polskiego.
Wnioskom tym trzeba się przypatrzyć z bliska. Co do pierwszego z nich, to abstrahując w tej chwili od zagadnienia, co robią w Polsce agenci faszystowscy i agenci generała Andersa, bo to nie należy do omawianej przez nas sprawy, powiedzieć trzeba, że proces sądowy nie dostarczył ani jednego dowodu, by wypadki kieleckie były przygotowane przez andersowców. Jeden tylko świadek Henryk Witelis mówił, że 4 lipca w Piekoszowie pod Kielcami bił Żydów tłum ludzi, wśród których był mężczyzna w mundurze armii gen. Andersa. Sprawa ta jednak nie wiąże się z wypadkami kieleckimi, wyżej wykazaliśmy, że zajścia kieleckie nie mogły być dziełem andersowców i że większość Żydów wymordowali żołnierze, milicja rządowa i członkowie partii rządowych.
Co do stanowiska PSL, to potępiła ona niedwuznacznie mordy kieleckie, ale znając metody postępowania tymczasowego rządu polskiego i znając, zdaje się, prawdziwy przebieg wypadków kieleckich, chciała widać zgodzić się na sposób potępienia wymagany przez rząd, aby wbrew prawdzie nie zohydzać własnego społeczeństwa.
Najcięższe zarzuty z racji wypadków kieleckich spadły na Kościół i jego hierarchię, dlatego też sprawę tę należy omówić obszernie.
Chodzi tu o odpowiedź na pytania:
Czy Kościół w Polsce szerzył antysemityzm?
Czy księża kieleccy mogli, lecz nie chcieli powstrzymać mordu kieleckiego?
Czy Kościół odmówił potępienia zbrodni kieleckiej ?Pierwsze z tych pytań właściwie nie wymaga odpowiedzi. Nauka Kościoła, głosząca że każdy człowiek jest bliźnim i że zabijać ani krzywdzić nikogo nie wolno, jest zupełnie wyraźna. Kościół potępia skrajny nacjonalizm i walkę klas. Postępowanie księży nie było i nie jest odmienne. Najlepszym tego gwarantem jest sama prasa rządowa, która choć zajmuje się tym problemem niezwykle obszernie, nie potrafiła zacytować ani jednego orędzia biskupiego o charakterze antysemickim, nie potrafiła przytoczyć żadnego nazwiska księdza katolickiego, który by do napadania i bicia Żydów zachęcał.
Prasa rządowa zgodnym chórem atakuje kardynała Hlonda za jego wywiad udzielony sprawozdawcom pism zagranicznych na temat wypadków kieleckich, choć nigdy w całości go nie przedrukowała, lecz operowała zawsze powyrywanymi z kontekstu, a często poprzekręcanymi zdaniami. Prymas Polski dał w tym wywiadzie krótki, lecz prawdziwy obraz wypadków kieleckich. Stwierdził więc, że w Polsce istnieje niechęć do Żydów, gdyż zajmują oni wybitne stanowiska rządowe i starają się zaprowadzić ustrój komunistyczny.
Na tym tle stają się zrozumiałe wypadki kieleckie, które jednak kardynał uważa za opłakane, które też jego zdaniem Kościół jako zabójstwo potępia. Ale jeżeli należy ubolewać nad tym, że na froncie politycznym w Polsce giną Żydzi, to trzeba ubolewać również i nad tym, że giną, i to w znacznie większej ilości, Polacy. Oświadczenie to jest tak zgodne z prawdą, że prasa rządowa w Polsce nie ośmieliła się podać go w całości, zrozumiałe jest jednak, że musiało ono wywołać jej wściekłość, bo trudno inaczej nazwać ataki na czczonego przez 90% Polaków prymasa. Prasę rządową zabolały dwie prawdy: jedna o roli Żydów, druga o mordowaniu Polaków. A przecie obydwie są niewątpliwe. Mówiliśmy już wyżej o pierwszej. Co do drugiej, to podkreślić należy, że codziennie niemal giną z rąk członków partii rządzących, z rąk milicji i służby bezpieczeństwa działacze PSL, działacze opozycji. W jednym tylko powiecie miechowskim ludzie rządowi wymordowali 260 chłopów polskich w ciągu 7 tygodni. A jednak choć zabójcy są znani, nie aresztuje się ich, nie wytacza się im procesów.
Milczy na ten temat prasa polska, nic o tym nie wie prasa zagraniczna. Stąd nic dziwnego, że gdy prymasa Polski zapytano, co sądzi o jednej zbrodni, zbrodni kieleckiej, odpowiedział, że potępia wszystkie, zarówno tę, której rząd nadał rozgłos, jak i te, o których mówić nie pozwala. Żaden biskup katolicki, żaden uczciwy człowiek nie mógłby się w tej sprawie wyrazić inaczej. Odmiennie sądzą tylko ludzie nieorientujący się w sytuacji lub ci, którzy uważają, że zabójstwo może być niedozwolone, ale może też być godne polecenia.
Czy księża kieleccy mogli, lecz nie chcieli powstrzymać mordów kieleckich ?W sprawie tej należy stwierdzić, co następuje. Biskup kielecki ks. Czesław Kaczmarek był wówczas w Kielcach nieobecny, gdyż od 4 czerwca do 24 lipca przebywał na Dolnym Śląsku. Zastępował go p.o. wikariusza generalnego ks. Piotr Dudziec. O zbiegowisku tłumu i mordowaniu Żydów przy ul. Planty 7 nikt nikogo z księży nie zawiadamiał. Przypadkiem dowiedział się o tym proboszcz parafii katedralnej ks. Zelek około godziny jedenastej i natychmiast udał się na miejsce wypadków. Zatrzymali go jednak żołnierze, mówiąc, że wszystko się już skończyło i że cywile muszą ulicę opuścić. Istotnie, przed domem Planty 7, jak to stwierdzają świadkowie, osób cywilnych wówczas nie było.
Około godz. 2 minut 20 po południu na wiadomość, że zabijanie Żydów zaczęło się na nowo, 5 księży udało się w dwóch grupach na ulicę Planty 7. Przybyli około godz. 3, ale i tym razem tłumu na ulicy nie było. Dom był otoczony kordonem wojska, a żołnierze poinformowali księży, że są niepotrzebni, bo wszystko się już skończyło. Rzeczywiście, jak to stwierdzają wszyscy świadkowie, zajścia przy ulicy Planty zakończyły się około godz. ósmej. Niewątpliwie gdyby księża zjawili się na ulicy Planty o godzinie 10 minut 15, może by ich rola mogła być aktywniejsza, ale milicja i Urząd Bezpieczeństwa nie uważały widać za wskazane wezwać ich na miejsce, tak jak i nie sądziły, by należało wezwać prokuratora. Oczywiście obecnie łatwiej jest za to na księży napadać.
Czy Kościół odmówił potępienia zbrodni kieleckiej ?Mówiliśmy wyżej o potępieniu jej przez przedstawiciela Kościoła w Polsce, kardynała Hlonda. Nie inaczej mogli postąpić inni biskupi polscy. W samych Kielcach zaraz 5 lipca wojewoda kielecki zwołał przedstawicieli miasta i duchowieństwa w sprawie wydania odezwy nawołującej kielczan do spokoju. Projektu takiej odezwy zebranie jednak nie przyjęło. Uchwalono, by odezwę taką przygotowała Kuria Biskupia. Ta istotnie przygotowała ją w dniu 6 lipca, ale władze rządowe jej nie opublikowały. Toteż Kuria przygotowała inną odezwę i kazała ją odczytać z ambon kościołów kieleckich w niedzielę dnia 7 lipca. Przyczyniła się ona wybitnie do uspokojenia umysłów w Kielcach. W dniu 11 lipca Kuria wydała do całej diecezji drugą odezwę. Wymowa jej jest niedwuznaczna, zupełnie wyraźna. Zbrodnia i zbrodniarze zostali potępieni z całą stanowczością. A jednak dziwna rzecz, odezwy tej prasa rządowa nie tylko nie przedrukowała, lecz ją w ogóle przemilczała, nie przestając mimo to atakować Kościoła w Polsce za jego milczenie w sprawie ekscesów kieleckich. Prasa ta domaga się zarazem zbiorowego wystąpienia Episkopu polskiego przeciwko antysemityzmowi. Jest to żądanie paradoksalne, a nawet ubliżające Kościołowi. Poza tym jest ono niewykonalne nie tylko z przyczyn o charakterze zasadniczym.
Ogromna większość Żydów w Polsce, jak już mówiliśmy wyżej, szerzy gorliwie komunizm, pracuje w osławionych urzędach bezpieczeństwa, dokonuje aresztowań, pastwi się nad aresztowanymi i zabija ich, a za to spotyka się z niechęcią społeczeństwa, które komunizmu nie chce, a metod Gestapo ma już dosyć.
I oto Kościół, stosownie do życzenia prasy rządowej, ma uroczyście ogłosić, że ta niechęć społeczeństwa jest nieuzasadniona, że postępowanie Żydów jest całkiem niewinne, że winni są tylko Polacy, którzy się na nich oburzają.
To jest właśnie prawdziwy sens żądań prasy rządowej. Przemilcza się to, że Kościół codziennie i stale głosi wykluczającą antysemityzm miłość bliźniego, że jak najszczerzej i najchętniej wyciąga rękę do Żydów dobrej woli, że zakazuje niezwykle surowo napadania na Żydów (zabójstwa kieleckie nazwano przecie w odezwie Kurii Kieleckiej z 11 lipca “zbrodnią wołającą o pomstę do Boga”, godną całkowitego i bezwzględnego potępienia), ale żąda się, by kościół publicznie, urzędowo orzekł, że Polacy i katolicy nie mają do nich słusznej urazy.
Wygląda to na żądanie od Kościoła, by zaaprobował system terroru, jaki jest obecnie w Polsce stosowany.
Jeżeli prasa rządowa stale wytyka Kościołowi miłość bliźniego, którą się jakoby w stosunku do Żydów nie odznacza, jeżeli ustawicznie mówi o jego obowiązkach, to może wreszcie sprowokować Episkopat Polski, że wykona on to żądanie i spełni swój obowiązek, a mianowicie powie katolikom polskim całą prawdę, nie tylko o zabijaniu Żydów, ale i mordowaniu tych tysięcy Polaków, po śmierci których nie urządza się śledztwa i wspaniałych procesów sądowych, o których nie mówi się przez wszystkie radia i o których nie piszą dzienniki całego świata.
Następstwa procesu sądowego w sprawie wypadków kieleckichZajścia kieleckie tymczasowy rząd polski rozgłosił możliwie jak najbardziej, postarał się o to, by dowiedziała się o nich jak najobszerniej zagranica, urządził proces-monstre w stosunku do zabójców. Genezy wypadków nie pozwolił poruszać przed sądem, ale choć cała prasa rządowa stale i obszernie mówi o niej już przez dwa miesiące, prawdy niezupełnie dało się zataić.
Nic w prasie, bo o tym pisać nie wolno, ale prywatnie w społeczeństwie zaczęto stawiać pytania, na które proces nie dał odpowiedzi, których w sposób niezrozumiały nie poruszył i nie wyjaśnił. A więc pytano na przykład o to, w jaki sposób zginęli podczas zajść dwaj Polacy, skoro Polacy byli stroną napadającą, a Żydzi bezbronnymi? Jak wytłumaczyć śmierć oficera, który przecież był uzbrojony i któremu towarzyszyli żołnierze? Jak wyjaśnić zjawisko, że mordowanie Żydów mogło się odbywać w biały dzień i to przez 8 godzin.
Pytania te, a może i odpowiedzi, jakie na nie dawano, dochodziły prawdopodobnie do wiadomości władz rządowych, te ostatnie musiały coś robić, aby zapobiec wytworzeniu się przekonania, że proces z 8-11 lipca nie odtworzył całej prawdy, że przeciwnie, tylko ją zaciemnił. I oto 15 lipca, tj. w 11 dni po wypadkach kieleckich, PAP podała suchą notatkę, że w związku z wypadkami w Kielcach zostali aresztowani szef Wojewódzkiego Urzędu Bezpieczeństwa w Kielcach Sobczyński, wojewódzki komendant milicji i jego zastępca oraz komendant komisariatu. Jako powód aresztowania podano nie dość energiczną działalność władz podczas wypadków. Krok ten miał dać odpowiedź na pytania, które sobie wszyscy w związku z wypadkami kieleckimi zadawali.
Nie można jednak wytłumaczyć wszystkiego brakiem energii tych paru oficerów rządowych, szereg pytań nadal czeka na odpowiedź. Zresztą nawet fakt ów aresztowania powiększa tylko wątpliwości, bo przecie gdy wypadki kieleckie czekały na proces tylko 4 dni, to od aresztowania tych oficerów upłynęło już półtora miesiąca. Aż do tej pory nie wytoczono im procesu, choć minister bezpieczeństwa, komunista Radkiewicz, w rozmowie z korespondentem “New York Timesa” przyznał winę Urzędu Bezpieczeństwa w wypadkach kieleckich i choć mogliby oni wiele powiedzieć o genezie i początku zajść, nie wiadomo nawet, czy osadzono ich w więzieniu. Informacja o tym byłaby tym bardziej wskazana, że są pogłoski, iż aresztowano ich tylko dla pozoru, że w rzeczywistości Sobczyński otrzymał już pod zmienionym nazwiskiem awans na inne stanowisko. W rezultacie coraz więcej osób nie wierzy dziś w urzędową wersję o zajściach kieleckich, nawet część prasy zagranicznej zaczyna na nią patrzeć krytycznie. Istotnie, dokładna analiza całej tej sprawy oraz zeznania świadków naocznych, którzy nie są kupieni lub sterroryzowani, jak to miało miejsce w procesie kieleckim, obalają tę wersję zupełnie.
Wnioski i zakończenieAnaliza wypadków i zeznania świadków doprowadzają nas do następujących wniosków w sprawie zajść kieleckich 4 lipca 1946 r. Wskutek komunistycznej działalności Żydów wytworzyła się w stosunku do nich nienawiść szerokich mas w Polsce. Rzeczywiste wypadki ginięcia dzieci w Kielcach przypisywane Żydom nie wywołały jej, lecz powiększyły ją w wysokim stopniu. Z tego postanowiły skorzystać pewne komunistyczne czynniki żydowskie w porozumieniu z opanowanym przez siebie Urzędem Bezpieczeństwa, aby wywołać pogrom, który by dało się potem rozgłosić jako dowód potrzeby emigracji Żydów do własnego kraju, jako dowód opanowania społeczeństwa polskiego przez antysemityzm i faszyzm i wreszcie jako dowód reakcyjności Kościoła, którego zabijający byli członkami. W tym celu władze bezpieczeństwa nie zapobiegły powstającemu zbiegowisku, nie zawiadomiły o zajściu prokuratora, nie dały rozkazów milicji i wojsku do energicznego wystąpienia. Władze bezpieczeństwa nie przewidziały jednak, jak się zdaje, rozmiarów zajścia. Żydzi z ulicy Planty 7, nie chcący na skutek instrukcji czy też z innych powodów otworzyć drzwi milicji, sprawili tym, że zaczęła je wyważać siłą. Odpowiedzieli na to strzałami, które spowodowały atak na nich milicji i motłochu, przy czym milicjanci i żołnierze chwytali Żydów, mordowali ich lub wydawali tłumowi na ulicy, a ten pastwił się nad nimi na oczach oddziałów milicjantów i wojska. Przedstawiciele Urzędu Bezpieczeństwa ograniczyli się tylko do obserwowania osób, zresztą w drugiej fazie zajść nie byli już w stanie ich opanować, gdyż większość milicji i wojska sympatyzowała z tłumem.
Do mordujących na ulicy Planty 7 należy zaliczyć milicjantów i żołnierzy, robotników oraz zebrany przypadkowo motłoch. Aresztowań dokonano tylko wśród tego ostatniego, gdyż posadzenie na ławie oskarżonych także milicjantów i robotników, będących członkami PPR, uniemożliwiłoby ukucie zarzutu, że mordowali tylko katolicy, uniemożliwiłoby atakowanie Kościoła katolickiego oraz andersowców i PSL. Ponieważ odsłonięcie całej prawdy o wypadkach skompromitowałoby rząd wobec społeczeństwa polskiego i zagranicy, a nawet wobec Żydów, których krwi chciano użyć dla celów politycznych, przeto na procesie nie pozwolono omawiać początków zajścia, gdyż świadkowie procesu mogliby się z tego domyślić istoty rzeczy.
Tak się przedstawiają w świetle bezstronnego badania wypadki kieleckie z dnia 4 lipca 1946 r. Wnioski nasze pozwalają na danie łatwej odpowiedzi na pytania, któreśmy w toku niniejszych rozważań wysuwali. Na zakończenie jeszcze jedna uwaga. Ci, którzy zabijali w Kielcach, godni są niewątpliwie najsurowszego potępienia niezależnie od tego, że byli sprowokowani, że działali w afekcie. Wszelki antysemityzm jest uczuciem poniżającym człowieka i nieetycznym. Mordowanie ludzi, choćby innej rasy czy przekonań, czy klasy społecznej, jest zawsze zbrodnią. Ale jeżeli w dniu 8 lipca zasiadło na ławie oskarżonych tylko 8 zabijających, to nie można tego nazwać aktem sprawiedliwości, bo powinni na niej zasiąść także i ci, którzy do wypadków kieleckich doprowadzili, którzy je sprowokowali, którym na nich zależało.
Nie umieścił ich wśród oskarżonych sąd, ale umieszcza ich moralnie opinia polska. Umieszcza ona na ławie oskarżonych i tych wszystkich, którzy sieją nienawiść, którzy ze zbrodni kieleckiej robią towar na sprzedanie, starając się pogłębić różnice w społeczeństwie polskim i zohydzić Polskę zagranicy.Źródło: Akta śledztwa, t. 3, k. 321-538, kopia, mps.

* * *

z pełnym poszanowaniem i respektem dla autorów, wydawców i praw autorskich, w dzisiejszych czasach powszechnego przemilczania i fałszowania historii i faktów historycznych, uważamy za szczególnie ważną powinność i obowiązek rozpowszechniania informacji, celem edukacji i uświadamiania, oraz bezpardonowej walki z owymi przemilczeniami i fałszami.

wersje internetową przygotowała, opracowała i fotografiami opatrzyła Polonica.net

Polski Związek Patriotyczny

Katolicko-Narodowy Ruch Oporu kontrjudaizacji i kontrdepolonizacji

O.R.K.A.N.

Poland was the only occupied country in which the Germans issued a decree warning that anyone helping the Jews
would be executed. In house-to-house searches, the Nazis often found Jews hiding there, and shot them along
with the Poles ( and their families ) who sheltered them. That the Germans even issued such a decree is
indicative of the fact that Polish assistance to the Jews was widespread. Many Poles were so traumatized that
they chose to remain neutral for fear of their lives. Our perception of them as passive or indifferent is unwarranted.
Considering the circumstances theirs was not a decision influenced by anti-semetism. But even with the threat
of discovery, and German reprisals, many Poles continued in their mission to shelter and hide Jews.

German and Soviet propaganda distorted and magnified the facts in order to inflame Polish-Jewish hostilities
Among the countless incidences staged by the Nazis was one in which Germans in Lodz destroyed a statue of the
Polish patriot Kosciuszko, and blamed it on the Jews. The Germans forced a group of Jews to stand in front of the
rubble and photographed it as “evidence”. Immediately thereafter, the Germans burned down a synagogue and
accused the Poles for having done so in retaliation. In Warsaw, on Passover, the Germans staged a riot which
lasted, ironically, for eight days. They recruited a thousand Polish youths to destroy Jewish homes and shops while
German soldiers were nearby filming the entire onslaught. The sole objective of Nazi propaganda was to bring
about Poland’s self-destruction by playing on Polish fears of being conquered by the Soviets. Moreover, the
suspicion that Britain and the US had abandoned the Poles and was about to betray them to the Soviets were
reasons enough for some Poles to collaborate with the Nazis. Any illusion of acquiring special protection or
benefits by collaboration, quickly vanished, as the German terror on Polish underground continued unabated.

The Polish Underground waged a continuous battle using counter propaganda of its own to demoralize and disrupt
the German rank and file. More importantly, the Underground sought to influence Polish attitudes by instructing
them to resist German propaganda and enticements to collaborate with them. The Nazis made numerous
concessions to the Polish people including re-opening Polish theatres and museums, and elminating the
requirement of passes for Poles using the trains. The Germans sometimes succeeded in luring members
of the AK out of hiding, only to deport them to concentration camps, or execute them.

While the majority of the Poles complied with the directives of the Polish Underground, others did not. Poland
endured a siege of German terror and brutality that over time contributed to the increase in delinquency, especially
in the youth. No morals or laws prevailed other than that which ensured Nazi supremacy. Every kind of depravity
was encouraged by the Nazis to erode the moral fabric of Polish society. The Poles who collaborated with the
Germans represented only a fraction of the Polish population.

In the political sphere, the most rabid element was the ONR ( Oboz Narodowo Rady Kalny ), a radical-nationalist
party which produced much of the Polish anti-semetic propaganda. They accused the Jews of starting the war,
and claimed that the Jews were collaborating with the Nazis and the Soviets in order to destroy Poland. This
political party was not represented in the Polish Underground State, nor in the Polish Government-in-exile, in
London.

Little or no attention has been given to the sacrifices made by heroic Poles – the men, and women who made
daring attempts to shelter Jews, under extraordinary circumstances. Catholic nuns frequently sheltered Jewish
children in their convents, teaching them Catholic prayers, and catechism, so that they could pass the scrutiny of
German interrogation. Among the religious orders that gave assistance to the Jews were: the Sisters of Maria’s
Family ( in Otwock, Pludy and several other Polish towns), the Ursuline Sisters ( in Warsaw-Powisle, among other
provincial convents), the Franciscan Sisters, in Lasku, the Sisters of the Lady Immaculate ( in Warsaw, Szymanow,
and Niepokalanow), the Sisters of Charity ( in the hospitals of Warsaw), and the Polish Relief Council in Otwock.

At the start of the war, there were Poles who were anti-semetic but who had changed their outlook because of the
Nazi atrocities committed against the Jews – men such as Stanislaw Piasecki, Adolf, Nowaczynski, Kozidkiewicz,
Witold Rudnicki, among many others. There are thousands of Poles who risked their lives and died in the process
of helping the Jews. Only a few of them have been documented and are honoured by Yad Vashem, in the
Righteous Among Nations. None have gained so much attention as the selfless act of one individual, Father
Maximillian Kolbe, a Franciscan monk. He was a Polish prisoner in Auschwitz, number 16670, who volunteered
to die instead of the fifteen Jews selected for death by slow starvation. The first victims of the gas chambers at
Auschwitz were 300 Poles and 700 Soviet POWs. Until 1942, Poles constituted 90% of the inmates of Stutthof.

Jan Karski, a national hero of the Polish Underground, was the first to report the news of German atrocities to the
Allied nations. He embarked on a gruelling mission through several occupied countries, transporting secret
microfilm to the Polish Government-in-exile in London – on it was documented evidence of the crimes committed
by the Germans – photographs, decrees, and statistics.

The most elaborate covert operation in saving the Jews was an organization called Zegota. Although its officical
name was Council for Aid to the Jews, it had to have been referred to in code in order to protect the organization
from blackmailers and informers. Zegota members represented a wide cross-section of Polish society. It was
an enormous network which overlapped with organizations in the Polish Underground State, Home Army, and
a countless array of individual Poles from every profession and trade. All were devoted to helping the work of
Zegota. The major scope of activity dealt with finding safe houses in which Jews could be hidden, the provision of
food, clothing, and whenever possible, medical care. They produced thousands of fake documents, such as birth
certificates, and passports, to conceal the true identity of the Jews. Many Jews were able to live on the Aryan side
(outside the ghettos) because their features were not semetic. They were the lucky few. Many others whose
appearance was obviously semetic, had to be hidden at all times, otherwise they would risk their death and the
death of the Poles sheltering them. Because of this risk, many Poles had no choice but to refuse to help them.
The largest source of aid to the Jews, which far surpassed Zegota, and the spontaneous efforts given randomly by
groups or individuals, was the Polish Underground State. Its’ organization, along political, military and civilian
divisions, was devoted to the restoration of Polands freedom and independence. Among its activities was the
mission to provide the Jews with a means of escape and shelter from Nazi persecution.

In 1940-41, the Polish government-in-exile and the Underground State were the first to report the news of the
persecution of the Jews in Poland. Initially, the British government received the reports with a great deal of
skepticism, believing that the Poles may have exaggerated. It was difficult for the British to comprehend how
German Kultur could descend to such depths of depravity. Irregardless of British stonewalling, Polish interventions
were immediately set into motion. Diplomatic meetings were held in Britain, and the U.S., resolutions were drawn up
and submitted to the United Nations. Ambassador Papee made several visits to the Vatican, meeting with
Secretary of State Cardinal Maglione, and Monsignor Tardem and Montini. He presented them with a memo from
Prime Minister Sikorski, in which he discussed the persecution of the Poles and Jews under Nazi occupation, and
requested the intervention of Pope Pius XII. Issues of the Black Book were also submitted. Papee also met with the
General of the Jesuit Order, Father Wlodzmierz Ledochowski to discuss using the Church and its agencies to
shelter Poles and Jews in Poland.

The Polish Foreign Office published a White Book entitled, ” The German Occupation of Poland “, printed in
English, French and Spanish. There were also two Black Books; Volume I ” The German Invasion of Poland ”
described the September Campaign. Volume II, ” The German New Order in Poland ” described the German
administration in Poland and the Soviet-German war of June 1941. It provided details concerning the fate of the
Jews, German regulations, descriptions of German atrocities, the burning of synagogues, locations of burials and
names of victims, confiscation of Jewish property, loss of freedom and rights, forced labor, ghettoes, and
death camps. Included were 30 photographs illustrating in graphic detail, life in the ghetto, as well as copies
of German decrees. This book was widely distributed in Great Britain and the US. Copies were sent to press
agencies and newspapers around the world.

Prime Minister Sikorski made several visits to the US as well as to London, and the Polish Embassy in Washington,
D.C. A flurry of telegrams between London and Warsaw document the extent of Polish efforts in pressuring the
Allies for military assistance. In 1941-42, Sikorski asked for an American declaration condemning German
oppressive policies against the Poles and the Jews. The US was unresponsive. As time passed, the situation\
grew more ominous, Sikorskis appeals became more frequent and urgent. Poles and Jews demanded that
Britain execute Germans in reprisal for Nazi atrocities committed against the Polish nation. The British refused
to intervene because it was not within the scope of their political objectives.

The American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress were receptive to Sikorskis arrival in the US,
and expressed hope for the liberation of Poland, but they quickly resorted to a litany of accusations of Polands
pre-war administration. They accused the Polish military of anti-semetism and referred to the periodical issued by
the ONR, entitled ” Jestem Polakiem ” ( I am Polish), that was radically nationalistic. Its circulation lasted only from
August 4, 1940 to May 15, 1941, at which time the Sikorski govenment called a stop to its publication, declaring it
to be detrimental. Sikorski tried to assure the Allies that the governments position was strongly opposed to
anti-semetism and considered it foreign to its government. He stated that ” the common suffering has created a
community of spirit between Poles and Jews”

The Jewish Morning Newspaper did acknowledge that the Sikorski government was moderate, but instead chose
to focus entirely on the fact that a few of its members were National Democrats. Many criticisms were made
purely on hearsay – as one by Jozef Tennenbaum, President of the American Federation of Polish Jews. He
claimed that tens of thousands of Poles helped the Germans to exterminate the Jews – it is completely
unsubstantiated. Jews were frequently at odds even with each other over the issue of anti-semetism. Rabbi Z.
Babad, who represented the Polish Agudists in Great Britain, condemed the Jews who made irresponsible
generalizations about Polish actions towards the Jews. He was a loyal supporter of the Sikorski government,
and he criticized foreign Jews, especially Zionists, for interfering in Polish internal affairs. Ludwik Grosfeld, a
Polish Jew, was appointed Minister of Treasury by Prime Minister Mikolajczyk. Grosfeld was severely criticized
by the Jews who accused him of being an ” assimilationist ”

After the Germans invaded Russia, the attacks on the Jews intensified. The Polish government countered German
propaganda by issuing a Declaration, entitled, ” Instruction No. 2 “, dated June 23, 1941. It read as follows:

” The government lays great stress on the necessity of warning the nations not to give in to German
baiters and not to adopt an active anti-Jewish attitude in the territories freed from Soviet occupation.
This is imperative for reasons of principle and political ones such as actions would be bound to make
it terribly difficult for the government to profit from the situation in the international field. ”

On Jan 13, 1942, Sikorski attended an inter-allied conference of nine countries ( which had been occupied by
Germany ), including delegates from Britain and the US. A resolution was made calling for the prosecution of
Germans who violated international law by committing violent crimes against civilians. Britain and the US
refused to sign it on the grounds that there was no verification that the reports were true.

The Polish Underground reported on the increase in German killings. One of many memos read as follows:

” I inform that the news about the murder of several thousand Jews in eastern Galicia is true. Mass
murder of Jews were also committed in the Wilno province, in Byelorussia, and in the Lublin province. In
Wilno alone, about sixty thousand Jews were murdered…. Delegate, April 8, 1942 “

Ambassador
Victor Ashe
Greetings from Warsaw!

November passed very quickly here. It was a very full month, starting off with great interest: the election on November 4 of Barack Obama as President.

Over 1,200 people gathered in Warsaw’s Hotel Intercontinental for an Election Night event hosted by the American Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw (AmCham), which the Embassy co-sponsored. In addition to the live coverage on giant screens provided by CNN and Poland’s TVP, TVN24, and Polsat, guests were treated to live music, a DJ, a great buffet, and a chance to vote in a “mock election” (Senator Obama defeated Senator McCain in this election too). All Polish television news programs were broadcasting from the event along with major radio stations and print press, with TVN24, Polsat, and TVP remaining throughout the night. Returns started coming in around 2:00 am Warsaw time. Poles were tremendously impressed by both the victory speech by President-elect Obama and the concession speech by Senator McCain. The cordial and respectful tone of each towards the other was well commented on.

Poles, like people in the United States, have discussed actively what a Barack Obama presidency will mean for the issues that concern them, like accession to the visa waiver program or the construction of a missile defense facility. Embassy diplomats and I have taken part in a number of interviews, talks, and panel discussions on the subject over the past month. Polish President Lech Kaczynski and Prime Minister Donald Tusk both sent letters of congratulations to President-elect Obama and spoke personally with him in phone calls on November 7.

November 4 had additional significance for Poles – on that day in Szczecin the Polish Government held an official welcome home ceremony for the last Polish soldiers to return home from Iraq after finishing their successful mission there. President Bush expressed the appreciation of the United States for Poland’s distinguished service alongside our troops since the war in Iraq began in an October 29 letter. Although the Polish military has concluded its service in Iraq, it has increased its presence in Afghanistan, where it has taken over primary responsibility for the province of Ghazni. The Poles have hit the ground running – and we hope that the many armored personnel carriers they have received from the U.S. military will help them succeed in their critical mission in safety.

Our recognition of Polish heroism in Iraq and Afghanistan continued with a poignant ceremony at the Embassy on November 19, in which Mrs. Dorota Pietrek received the Purple Heart awarded to her son Dawid Pietrek, who died in Afghanistan on June 14 while serving as a Private First Class in the U.S. Marines. Dawid had immigrated to the United States in 2005 and worked in health care before enlisting. Illinois Lieutenant Governor Pat Quinn and Embassy U.S. Marine Security Guard Detachment Commander Sgt. Robert Kunard joined me in expressing our appreciation for Dawid’s sacrifice to his mother, his sister Ewelina Pietrek, and his grandmother Jadwiga Huniewicz, who had traveled to Warsaw from Police, near Szczecin, for the occasion. The ceremony was covered by the Polish public television channel TVP.

In happier news, we have taken further steps toward the official launch of a year of celebrating the 90th anniversary of U.S.-Polish Diplomatic Relations in 2009. The United States not only was the lead country pushing for an independent Poland as part of the peace plan for the end of World War I, but was also the first country to recognize the new Polish government. The finishing touches are now being put on a book, jointly produced by the Polish Foreign Ministry and the U.S. Embassy, which will commemorate our shared history. On November 7, I took part in a conference at the Igancy Jan Paderewski Museum in Warsaw’s Lazienki Park to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of Poles in Jamestown, Virginia. That same day, I visited the Rogow Forestry and Environment Experiment Station of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW) to preview a site that will host a new North American Trail in honor of the 90th anniversary.

The environment and climate change are topics of much conversation in Poland, with the 14th annual UN Conference on Climate Change (COP-14) running December 1-12 in Poznan, Poland. The Polish Government and all embassies have been busy preparing for the 8,000 delegates and 600 news reporters that will descend on the western Polish town for the follow-on to last year’s conference in Bali and precursor to Copenhagen in 2009. The U.S. Delegation will be led by Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky. Several Members of the U.S. Congress are also expected, if Congress does not extend its session throughout that period. The U.S. goal for the session is to make forward progress for a possible new international agreement on climate change to be reached next year in Copenhagen. During the conference, the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan plans to confer an honorary doctorate on former Vice President Al Gore, who will attend the conference. In anticipation of the Poznan events, the Warsaw School of Economics (SGH) hosted climate change expert and former CIA Director James Woolsey for a well-received talk on November 13.

Other distinguished visitors this month included an American astronaut with Polish ancestry: George Zamka, a pilot for the Space Shuttle Discovery. Zamka visited Warsaw, Olsztyn, Krakow, Chorzow, and Sopotnia Wielka November 16-23 for public talks, meetings with students, and interviews with the press. At a reception at my Residence on November 17, Zamka helped me present awards to students who participated in and won prizes in two space-related contests sponsored by the Embassy with the Students’ Space Association and with Fundacja Wspomagania Wsi (Rural Development Foundation). Zamka also presented to the Museum of Polish Army during a ceremony on November 18 a Kosciuszko Squadron patch that was produced by Polish film producer Adam Ustynowicz – which had flown in space with him on the Discovery. The Embassy had recently given the museum a grant to make upgrades to their Kosciuszko Squadron exhibit.

At the same time that our thoughts have turned to celebrating Thanksgiving, we have also been reaching out to thank and highlight 16 Polish individuals who have done great work in their activities to end gender-based violence. Starting with the November 25 International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, we have been featuring a new profile each day as our participation in the U.N.-sponsored “16 Days of Activism Against Gender Based Violence.” We have already profiled such women as Manuela Gretkowska, Renata Durda, Malgorzata Tarasiewicz, and Monika Ksieniewicz. To learn more about these remarkable individuals and a dozen others, please visit our website.

Other noteworthy events this month include the Pole’s celebration of the country’s 90th anniversary of independence at the end of World War I. The Embassy’s Marine Security Guards participated in the November 11 march in Warsaw, with our flag enjoying a place of honor during the ceremony. A week later, the Special Olympics International Torch Run relay passed through Warsaw, making a stop by the Embassy, where I was privileged to greet them with brief remarks, and I also hosted the participants and organizers for a reception at my residence. In a related event, Polish medal-winning athletes from the Beijing Olympics and previous Olympics joined American basketball players from the Polish professional league in a luncheon at my Residence on November 24. The Embassy and the Fulbright Commission also produced an excellent education conference for International Education Week on November 18.

As we look forward to the holiday season, we will still find ourselves fully engaged in other activities. In addition to the climate change conference in Poznan, the last of the original order of F16s Poland purchased will arrive on December 11, we will launch a new documentary contest with Polish Public Television TVP for the 90th anniversary, and negotiating teams will continue to meet to conclude the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). We also look forward to the Social Security Totalization Agreement being implemented in the early part of 2009.

I wish you all a safe and happy holiday season.

Sincerely Yours,

Victor Ashe

The Diversity Visa Lottery is congressionally mandated and administrated
annually by the Department of State (DS) according to the provisions of the
Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The DS’ Web
site states: “Section 203(c) of the INA provides a maximum of up to 55,000
Diversity Visas (DV) each fiscal year to be made available to persons from
countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. (…) Within
each region, no one country may receive more than seven percent of the
available Diversity Visas in any one year”. According to the same source,
Poland is not eligible to participate in this year’s edition of the program
as more than 50,000 immigrants from the country received their visas to the
U.S. over the period of the previous five years.

As a Pole living in the United States since 1987 I am shocked and offended by this injustice which is taking place in the USA, the very same country that is the symbol of freedom and social justice to the rest of the world.

Why is this system so corrupt? Where was the Polish minority in America then? Is this how our cooperation should look like? Did the Founding Fathers want THIS? Is this the ‘special relation’ between Poland and the United States? Is this why Poland is the main partner in the coalition with the USA? Is this why Poland sends her troops to Kosovo, Haiti, Iraq, Afghanistan, Golan Heights, Panama and many other regions in the world?

Is this why 20 Polish soldiers died in Iraq? Is this why General Kosciusko and General Pulaski fought for the freedom of this country? Is this why Polish soldiers fought and died in WWII on the battlefield against Nazi Germany, constituting the 4th army in the allied forces?

Is this how you thank us for our destruction of communism and the bringing of freedom to many countries of the world? Is this the thanks we receive for agreeing on the location of the new anti-ballistic shield in Poland?

Here, in the USA, you cast a blind eye on terrorists, drug dealers and criminals, but deport an honest, hard-working Polish family living in the USA for 21 years; a mother with 5 children. This is sick, inhumane, immoral and difficult to understand for every person with common sense.

What is the Polish American Congress doing in regards to this matter? They eat pierogi and bigos, and raise toasts in the Polish Embassy in Washington, that’s all. And these are the results.

Where is any legal help? If that family had been given any legal help in time, they would not have been deported. Where is the co-operation with Polish government and Polish Families’ League?

What is the Committee for Cooperation with Polish Emigrants doing?
Here, in the USA, and in Europe, the anti-Polish media slanders Poland and Poles. But our Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Polish Embassy in Washington and the Polish American Congress in the USA do nothing about it.

Alex Lech Bajan
Polish American Arlington Virginia
Email: Polonia@raqport.com 703 -528-0114

Jewish collaboration with the Soviets provoked an outpouring of condemnation by the Polish people. They accused
the Jews of conspiring with the Soviets to destroy Poland. When the newly-created Polish Army was relocated from
Russia to the Middle East, thousands of Polish Jews, who had enlisted, deserted the army en masse. Though
General Anders granted them all amnesty, it is not surprising that resentment within the army ranks grew – but
not for reasons of anti-semetism. This desertion was a betrayal of Poland, on the very eve of battle. But with the
establishment of the Jewish Ghettos, Polish opinion began to transform from one of hatred and anger to that of
sympathy and deep compassion. Poles who had themselves been victims of German bestiality knew with what
anguish the Jews suffered. They were witness to the horrors of the ghettos and the sentence imposed upon its’
victims – slow starvation and the deportations to death camps. Many Poles felt compelled to act on the grounds of
decency and humanitarianism, overlooking past resentments, betrayal, even anti-semetism, to come to the aid of
the Jews. At great risk to their own lives, Polish men, women and children tossed bundles of food over the ghetto
walls. Polish families opened their homes to Jews fleeing Nazi persecution. Many Poles even constructed secret
bunkers beneath their basements, or erected fake wall partitions, for the purpose of hiding as many Jews as
possible. Elaborate means were used to smuggle food, clothing and medical care to the Jews in hiding, so as not
to arouse public suspicion.

Poland was the only occupied country in which the Germans issued a decree warning that anyone helping the Jews
would be executed. In house-to-house searches, the Nazis often found Jews hiding there, and shot them along
with the Poles ( and their families ) who sheltered them. That the Germans even issued such a decree is
indicative of the fact that Polish assistance to the Jews was widespread. Many Poles were so traumatized that
they chose to remain neutral for fear of their lives. Our perception of them as passive or indifferent is unwarranted.
Considering the circumstances theirs was not a decision influenced by anti-semetism. But even with the threat
of discovery, and German reprisals, many Poles continued in their mission to shelter and hide Jews.

German and Soviet propaganda distorted and magnified the facts in order to inflame Polish-Jewish hostilities
Among the countless incidences staged by the Nazis was one in which Germans in Lodz destroyed a statue of the
Polish patriot Kosciuszko, and blamed it on the Jews. The Germans forced a group of Jews to stand in front of the
rubble and photographed it as “evidence”. Immediately thereafter, the Germans burned down a synagogue and
accused the Poles for having done so in retaliation. In Warsaw, on Passover, the Germans staged a riot which
lasted, ironically, for eight days. They recruited a thousand Polish youths to destroy Jewish homes and shops while
German soldiers were nearby filming the entire onslaught. The sole objective of Nazi propaganda was to bring
about Poland’s self-destruction by playing on Polish fears of being conquered by the Soviets. Moreover, the
suspicion that Britain and the US had abandoned the Poles and was about to betray them to the Soviets were
reasons enough for some Poles to collaborate with the Nazis. Any illusion of acquiring special protection or
benefits by collaboration, quickly vanished, as the German terror on Polish underground continued unabated.

The Polish Underground waged a continuous battle using counter propaganda of its own to demoralize and disrupt
the German rank and file. More importantly, the Underground sought to influence Polish attitudes by instructing
them to resist German propaganda and enticements to collaborate with them. The Nazis made numerous
concessions to the Polish people including re-opening Polish theatres and museums, and elminating the
requirement of passes for Poles using the trains. The Germans sometimes succeeded in luring members
of the AK out of hiding, only to deport them to concentration camps, or execute them.

While the majority of the Poles complied with the directives of the Polish Underground, others did not. Poland
endured a siege of German terror and brutality that over time contributed to the increase in delinquency, especially
in the youth. No morals or laws prevailed other than that which ensured Nazi supremacy. Every kind of depravity
was encouraged by the Nazis to erode the moral fabric of Polish society. The Poles who collaborated with the
Germans represented only a fraction of the Polish population.

In the political sphere, the most rabid element was the ONR ( Oboz Narodowo Rady Kalny ), a radical-nationalist
party which produced much of the Polish anti-semetic propaganda. They accused the Jews of starting the war,
and claimed that the Jews were collaborating with the Nazis and the Soviets in order to destroy Poland. This
political party was not represented in the Polish Underground State, nor in the Polish Government-in-exile, in
London.

Little or no attention has been given to the sacrifices made by heroic Poles – the men, and women who made
daring attempts to shelter Jews, under extraordinary circumstances. Catholic nuns frequently sheltered Jewish
children in their convents, teaching them Catholic prayers, and catechism, so that they could pass the scrutiny of
German interrogation. Among the religious orders that gave assistance to the Jews were: the Sisters of Maria’s
Family ( in Otwock, Pludy and several other Polish towns), the Ursuline Sisters ( in Warsaw-Powisle, among other
provincial convents), the Franciscan Sisters, in Lasku, the Sisters of the Lady Immaculate ( in Warsaw, Szymanow,
and Niepokalanow), the Sisters of Charity ( in the hospitals of Warsaw), and the Polish Relief Council in Otwock.

At the start of the war, there were Poles who were anti-semetic but who had changed their outlook because of the
Nazi atrocities committed against the Jews – men such as Stanislaw Piasecki, Adolf, Nowaczynski, Kozidkiewicz,
Witold Rudnicki, among many others. There are thousands of Poles who risked their lives and died in the process
of helping the Jews. Only a few of them have been documented and are honoured by Yad Vashem, in the
Righteous Among Nations. None have gained so much attention as the selfless act of one individual, Father
Maximillian Kolbe, a Franciscan monk. He was a Polish prisoner in Auschwitz, number 16670, who volunteered
to die instead of the fifteen Jews selected for death by slow starvation. The first victims of the gas chambers at
Auschwitz were 300 Poles and 700 Soviet POWs. Until 1942, Poles constituted 90% of the inmates of Stutthof.

Jan Karski, a national hero of the Polish Underground, was the first to report the news of German atrocities to the
Allied nations. He embarked on a gruelling mission through several occupied countries, transporting secret
microfilm to the Polish Government-in-exile in London – on it was documented evidence of the crimes committed
by the Germans – photographs, decrees, and statistics.

The most elaborate covert operation in saving the Jews was an organization called Zegota. Although its officical
name was Council for Aid to the Jews, it had to have been referred to in code in order to protect the organization
from blackmailers and informers. Zegota members represented a wide cross-section of Polish society. It was
an enormous network which overlapped with organizations in the Polish Underground State, Home Army, and
a countless array of individual Poles from every profession and trade. All were devoted to helping the work of
Zegota. The major scope of activity dealt with finding safe houses in which Jews could be hidden, the provision of
food, clothing, and whenever possible, medical care. They produced thousands of fake documents, such as birth
certificates, and passports, to conceal the true identity of the Jews. Many Jews were able to live on the Aryan side
(outside the ghettos) because their features were not semetic. They were the lucky few. Many others whose
appearance was obviously semetic, had to be hidden at all times, otherwise they would risk their death and the
death of the Poles sheltering them. Because of this risk, many Poles had no choice but to refuse to help them.
The largest source of aid to the Jews, which far surpassed Zegota, and the spontaneous efforts given randomly by
groups or individuals, was the Polish Underground State. Its’ organization, along political, military and civilian
divisions, was devoted to the restoration of Polands freedom and independence. Among its activities was the
mission to provide the Jews with a means of escape and shelter from Nazi persecution.

In 1940-41, the Polish government-in-exile and the Underground State were the first to report the news of the
persecution of the Jews in Poland. Initially, the British government received the reports with a great deal of
skepticism, believing that the Poles may have exaggerated. It was difficult for the British to comprehend how
German Kultur could descend to such depths of depravity. Irregardless of British stonewalling, Polish interventions
were immediately set into motion. Diplomatic meetings were held in Britain, and the U.S., resolutions were drawn up
and submitted to the United Nations. Ambassador Papee made several visits to the Vatican, meeting with
Secretary of State Cardinal Maglione, and Monsignor Tardem and Montini. He presented them with a memo from
Prime Minister Sikorski, in which he discussed the persecution of the Poles and Jews under Nazi occupation, and
requested the intervention of Pope Pius XII. Issues of the Black Book were also submitted. Papee also met with the
General of the Jesuit Order, Father Wlodzmierz Ledochowski to discuss using the Church and its agencies to
shelter Poles and Jews in Poland.

The Polish Foreign Office published a White Book entitled, ” The German Occupation of Poland “, printed in
English, French and Spanish. There were also two Black Books; Volume I ” The German Invasion of Poland ”
described the September Campaign. Volume II, ” The German New Order in Poland ” described the German
administration in Poland and the Soviet-German war of June 1941. It provided details concerning the fate of the
Jews, German regulations, descriptions of German atrocities, the burning of synagogues, locations of burials and
names of victims, confiscation of Jewish property, loss of freedom and rights, forced labor, ghettoes, and
death camps. Included were 30 photographs illustrating in graphic detail, life in the ghetto, as well as copies
of German decrees. This book was widely distributed in Great Britain and the US. Copies were sent to press
agencies and newspapers around the world.

Prime Minister Sikorski made several visits to the US as well as to London, and the Polish Embassy in Washington,
D.C. A flurry of telegrams between London and Warsaw document the extent of Polish efforts in pressuring the
Allies for military assistance. In 1941-42, Sikorski asked for an American declaration condemning German
oppressive policies against the Poles and the Jews. The US was unresponsive. As time passed, the situation\
grew more ominous, Sikorskis appeals became more frequent and urgent. Poles and Jews demanded that
Britain execute Germans in reprisal for Nazi atrocities committed against the Polish nation. The British refused
to intervene because it was not within the scope of their political objectives.

The American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress were receptive to Sikorskis arrival in the US,
and expressed hope for the liberation of Poland, but they quickly resorted to a litany of accusations of Polands
pre-war administration. They accused the Polish military of anti-semetism and referred to the periodical issued by
the ONR, entitled ” Jestem Polakiem ” ( I am Polish), that was radically nationalistic. Its circulation lasted only from
August 4, 1940 to May 15, 1941, at which time the Sikorski govenment called a stop to its publication, declaring it
to be detrimental. Sikorski tried to assure the Allies that the governments position was strongly opposed to
anti-semetism and considered it foreign to its government. He stated that ” the common suffering has created a
community of spirit between Poles and Jews”

The Jewish Morning Newspaper did acknowledge that the Sikorski government was moderate, but instead chose
to focus entirely on the fact that a few of its members were National Democrats. Many criticisms were made
purely on hearsay – as one by Jozef Tennenbaum, President of the American Federation of Polish Jews. He
claimed that tens of thousands of Poles helped the Germans to exterminate the Jews – it is completely
unsubstantiated. Jews were frequently at odds even with each other over the issue of anti-semetism. Rabbi Z.
Babad, who represented the Polish Agudists in Great Britain, condemed the Jews who made irresponsible
generalizations about Polish actions towards the Jews. He was a loyal supporter of the Sikorski government,
and he criticized foreign Jews, especially Zionists, for interfering in Polish internal affairs. Ludwik Grosfeld, a
Polish Jew, was appointed Minister of Treasury by Prime Minister Mikolajczyk. Grosfeld was severely criticized
by the Jews who accused him of being an ” assimilationist ”

After the Germans invaded Russia, the attacks on the Jews intensified. The Polish government countered German
propaganda by issuing a Declaration, entitled, ” Instruction No. 2 “, dated June 23, 1941. It read as follows:

” The government lays great stress on the necessity of warning the nations not to give in to German
baiters and not to adopt an active anti-Jewish attitude in the territories freed from Soviet occupation.
This is imperative for reasons of principle and political ones such as actions would be bound to make
it terribly difficult for the government to profit from the situation in the international field. ”

On Jan 13, 1942, Sikorski attended an inter-allied conference of nine countries ( which had been occupied by
Germany ), including delegates from Britain and the US. A resolution was made calling for the prosecution of
Germans who violated international law by committing violent crimes against civilians. Britain and the US
refused to sign it on the grounds that there was no verification that the reports were true.

The Polish Underground reported on the increase in German killings. One of many memos read as follows:

” I inform that the news about the murder of several thousand Jews in eastern Galicia is true. Mass
murder of Jews were also committed in the Wilno province, in Byelorussia, and in the Lublin province. In
Wilno alone, about sixty thousand Jews were murdered…. Delegate, April 8, 1942 ”

As the massacres began to spread throughout eastern Poland into the General Gouvernement, Prime Minister
Sikorski sent dispatches to the Allied govenments reporting that :

” Extermination of the Jewish population is taking place at an unbelievable extent…mass slaughter
of tens of thousands of Jews is being carried out. In the ghettos of Warsaw and Krakow, mass
executions are being carried out every day. Jews ill with typhus are being shot. The Jews of Poland
are suffering the most terrible persecution in the entire history…”

Alex Lech Bajan

RAQport Inc.
2004 North Monroe Street
Arlington Virginia 22207
Washington DC Area
USA
TEL: 703-528-0114
TEL2: 703-652-0993
FAX: 703-940-8300
sms: 703-485-6619
EMAIL: polonia@raqport.com
WEB SITE: http://raqport.com

Chomsky on Dershowitz’ “jihad” against Finkelstein Part 2

It was a few years ago when corporate TV stations showed a terrible situation in Argentina – a country of a stormy past, but in a pretty good shape since the introduction of global economy. Crowds of people protesting in the streets, soldiers shooting at them. Smoke, squibs, fire and unemployment surpassing 22 per cent. In 2001 Argentina was on the bottom of an abyss, from which – according to Western economists – there was no escape. Globalists, industrialists and bankers were massively leaving the country taking away with them whatever still could be taken. The media were ordered to forget about that country and its sheer existence.

In December 2001 Argentina fund herself in an economical hole into which it was pushed by its elites and globalism. The banks stopped paying out the money. Nobody was able to control the economy of the country. President Carlos Menem, previously in power, an industrialist chosen for the post in 1989, had promised Argentineans beautiful women and Ferrari cars. But through the back door he would sell out the country’s assets to foreign hands for ridiculously low prices. He borrowed large sums of money from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The citizens of Argentina, which thanks to the borrowed money was prospering like never before, cheered for their President and declared him a genius of the free market.

The idyll ended when they had to start paying back the borrowed money. In 2001 the gross domestic product went down as much as 11 per cent. However, the country did not receive any additional funds or any concrete pieces of advice from the IMF.

The history of Argentina is full of unsuccessful uprisings, sudden upheavals, protests and wars. It is also full of poverty of masses and unimaginable richness of a small group of the chosen ones. It is full of corruption, horrible torture and fascist prisons. But by the end of 1990s the whole world was left speechless. What was going on the streets of Argentina was a warning and a prophecy for the enthusiasts of global economy.

In private the journalists were wondering how it was possible to ruin a whole country in such a short time. How was it possible that no one noticed that and no one counter-reacted? Such questions were circulating in the Internet and in private conversations. But newspapers and TV bulletins were chasing for sensation and blubbering about fiscal irresponsibility on a large scale. Average Argentineans and the new president, De la Rua, were soon to be blamed for everything.

Argentina was alive and kicking, but corporate media did not want to let the public know about it. In 1999, when De la Rua was chosen President and the country had already been in recession for 3 years, conniving CNN would announce that Menem had not been re-elected because he could not enter for election for the third time, according to the constitution. However, he said that he would enter the election in 2003. Menem belonged to Peronists party, the biggest political power in Argentina. He was closely linked with the USA, globalism and free market.

The new President of Argentina had almost no move. Peronists were still in power and they attacked him from the very beginning. De la Rua asked his countrymen in his speeches: ‘Please, understand how important is unity. I want to be the President of all Argentineans.’

When economic crash came, International Monetary Fund was the first to wash their hands. Its experts claimed that Argentina spent too much Money although the country’s budget was much smaller than the budget of the USA during the Great Depression. When the economists ridiculed such an explanation, the lawyers of IMF began their attack. They claimed that Argentina had had such rights to distribute the loans to which the Fund had to adjust and which made normal economical functioning impossible. It means that the Fund wants us to believe that poor Argentina dictated them the conditions.

All that show was supervised by the elites of the USA. For the last 55 years, during the whole existence of the International Monetary Fund, the voice of the United States has been decisive. Other rich member countries could easily oppose the USA in voting and win, but by some strange coincidence they never did. When we take a closer look at IMF we will find out that in fact it is only a group of lenders ruled by the American Treasury. We should not be surprised then that the American government (and the obedient American and Western media after them) unanimously stated that Argentina must be submissive to the rules imposed on her by the IMF.

Economical analysis

Today we know already why Argentina’s economy collapsed, although the media do not want to say it. I am begging here for a special attention of the readers in Poland. In 1991 Menem based the country’s economy on a ‘higher’ currency which was the American dollar. A stable exchange rate of 1:1 between the dollar and the Argentinean peso was introduced. Menem hoped that the dollar would soon become the circulating currency in Argentina. It was quite a good idea at first, but soon it turned out that the value of the dollar was overrated. Automatically the value of the Argentinean peso was also overvalued. Let us pay attention how the euro is functioning in Poland.

At the moment when investors figured out that the value of the peso is overrated they started fearing that it would fall. That is why they began demanding higher and higher interest rates on everything. Also on private and government loans. It caused a huge debt. The interest rate was raised to 40 per cent.

To keep up the parity on the American currency, the Argentinian government had to have adequate amount of American dollars in the banks. The more the crisis developed the more American dollars the government had to buy for a significantly overrated price. More and more people demanded transactions in cash. This process pushed Argentina into a debt of 140 billion of dollars. In December 2001 the Argentinian government announced to the world that they are not able to pay anything. Argentina became the pariah of nations.

To keep up the overrated value of the peso, International Monetary Fund gave Argentina huge loans. Only in one year to the country’s Treasury were sent 40 billion dollars as a package organised by many lending institutions. Only one basic requirement that was to guarantee that these loans would be paid off was to maintain zero budget deficit. Which meant that Argentina had to oscillate on 100 per cent of the budget. It is impossible during a recession to keep 100% of a budget, besides it takes some painful operations like serious cuts in the budget, which in turn cause high level of unemployment eventually leading to street fighting on a big scale.

How did that process look like from the point of view of an average, hard-working Argentinian? At the beginning of the 1990s Argentinians were encouraged to buy almost everything. Companies were privatized and incorporated into conglomerates. People were encouraged to build houses by giving them low-mortgage loans. People were asked to set up their own companies and those who were laid off were given compensation packages. Luxury cars were shown to the middle class and sold for very low down-payments for high-percentage loans and long-term payments. The media shouted out that the situation is so good, that everybody would be able to afford to pay off the loans on cars or houses. ‘You can have everything now – you will pay off later!’. The Argentinians – like Poles today – enjoyed the prosperity not knowing that a trap had been set up for them. After 40 years of poverty and wars they could at last have in their gardens or garages what so far they had seen in American films.

With the Western capital came the people whose task was to watch its flow. They taught Argentinians what the free market and global economy is about. Soon they had such huge influence on Argentina’s administrating structure that the country, practically speaking, lost its independence.

In the situation when the American dollar was bought with the peso at the rate of 1:1, everything that was produced in Argentina (as well as services) was too expensive to be exported. The whole country – just like Poland and other countries – was literally choked to death. Import of goods was much cheaper than their production. In that way almost 10% of gross domestic product was destroyed.

Mass privatizations at the beginning of the 1990s of almost all national assets for a fraction of its market value had already caused unemployment on a big scale. Mainly electricity, municipal and telecommunication companies were privatized. Globalists know very well how to do it. You start privatizing from the chosen key sectors. After that, other co-operating sectors become incompatible. Then there is no way out but to privatize all other sectors in the structure upwards. When the spiral of privatization went up, the spiral of dismissions from work went down. At the bottom there was a bigger and bigger number of unemployed people ending up with no means of living.

On the scale of the country, the spiral movement up was balanced by the movement down. Finally more and more people stopped doing their shopping and the money stopped circulating. So did the taxes. Poor Argentinians did not pay taxes because they had nothing – instead, they started buying rifles. When the money stopped circulating, now privatised companies laid off more and more people to keep up the economy of their firms. Those three inter-related crisises (taxes, unemployment, overrated value of the currency) get the Argentinian government to beg IMF for help or advice. International Monetary Fund, after long negotiations, made their decision. ‘Argentina is too much in debt. We can’t help. Let us leave that country in the state of free falling into an abyss.’ Also, during many military councils the decision was made how to cut off Argentina from the outside world if the expected rebellion of armed Argentinians was to spread across the borders.

This decision by IMF get the Argentinians (who foresaw the fall of the value of the peso) to rush to the banks to pay out their savings. The banks were closed, the salaries in many sectors of the country’s economy were held up. In desperation, the President declared that Argentina stopped paying off her debts. The press foretold that in the country there would be hair-raising scenes and after that they lost their interest in the matter.

The Argentinian miracle

It seemed that there was no retreat for Argentina. The rats began to leave the sinking ship. President Menem left for Chile. The businessmen and their international advisors were leaving for their countries. Even small investors, whose parents had come to Argentina in search for a better life, frantically tried to get entry visas to their mother countries. Whole factories with full machinery equipment were left behind – it was not profitable to produce there anything any more. The workers were laid off with nothing. Beautiful residences with swimming-pools were left abandoned, as well as whole office blocks lined out with marble. Those who had led to that crisis were moving like locust on other fields which could still be eaten up.

’Time’ magazine was wondering: ‘What can President De la Rua do now? This is a million-dollar question. Whether alone or in a coalition, he immediately needs a plan to ease the crisis. He has to help his countrymen to fill their stomachs and, maybe, to revive economical growth. The problem is that – to ease the results of the crisis concerning poor people – the government has to spend millions of dollars on food and basic needs. And this will cause a further escalation of the financial crisis. Something must happen…’

And it did happen! The Argentinians trusted their President who broke the negotiations with international financiers. The army, police and ordinary people lined up in support. They claimed that Argentina belonged to Argentinians, not to international financial mafia. The Argentinian government, left alone, made a decision which get the White House and international bankers furious. Against their recommendation, the exchange rate of the peso was freed. Minister of Economy, Roberto Lavagna, stated: ‘Having competitive prices of currency exchange will help our export and enable fulfillment of the country’s needs.’ They also decided to end the free market policy to which the country’s economy was a prisoner. An economical co-operation with Brazil and China was established. Some capital started to flow to the country. The central bank began to buy the dollar again, but only as much as necessary to keep up the economic growth.

When Argentina announced that after 3 years from the moment of separation from degenerated ideas of globalists she was able to pay 30 cents for every dollar of her debt and keep up her unprecedented economical growth, at first nobody believed her. Then the media were strictly forbidden to inform about it. We should not be surprised as it is a palpable proof how quickly an economy of a given country and life of its citizens can improve when they forget about globalist absurdities.

In December 2004 the British ‘Guardian’ wrote: Three years ago, in December, Argentina was in crisis. The economy was rolling down uncontrolled into an abyss, banks closed their door to the investors, company presidents changed every week. Today the common opinion among the economists in Buenos Aires are that the country has left the worst behind. Yes, Argentina is still fighting with a complicated process of reconstruction of her debt, but the economy has undergone incredible changes.’

Like Phoenix, the economy has risen from the ashes. After an 11-per-cent fall in 2002, in 2003 the domestic product rose almost 9% and it will rise another 8% this year*. The government carefully announces that GDP will rise 4% in 2005, but most experts in economy believe that in fact the growth will be 5%.

The assumptions of ‘free market’ were bad for jobs and employment. In 2002 the unemployment reached its peak with 22%. Now it is 12%.

Whether you are faithful believers or not, some commentators say about the rise of Argentina as of a miracle which Rodrigo Rato, the director of IMF, could not cause. The hand of God turned out to be more powerful than the hand of International Monetary Fund. Now nobody is cheating any more.

Another thing which is hidden by the media was the fact of absolute unification of the working class with the management class. When the factory owners closed their firms and fled to other countries, their workers and directors occupied nearby cafes and park benches. When they were sitting idly on the streets, they were discussing how to improve their life and situation of their country, doomed to fail. The employees of such abandoned factories as Zanon looked at the gates melancholically. They spent most of their lives in those factories. Finally they made up their minds. They entered the grounds of their empty and devastated factories, started the machines and began production out of the materials which were still in the warehouses.

The authorities and the army looked at that almost communist-like behaviour of the people in a friendly manner. Soon department managers, office clerks and economic directors joined the turners, polishers and warehouse men. In the record-breaking time sales and export were initiated. There were no fixed hours of work. The decisions concerning their factories were taken by the people during short production meetings.

It turned out that the production is profitable and needed. What had not been profitable for globalists started to be such for common people without the help from banks and financial cartels. Soon production and sales reached their record levels in some factories. The people shared the profit with one another. They had never earned such sums of money before. So, they started to spend them. Thus building industry and other branches of industry got moving.

All that happened so quickly that America did not even have enough time to declare Argentina a communist country. The Movement of Unemployed Workers (MTD) was established. Soon this organisation had the power to influence politics. And that was yet another mystery of the Argentinian miracle.

The rats come back

The situation of Argentina began to improve. Globalists and factory owners began to come back and demand a return of their factories taken over by the people. Those who had left the country on the verge of a civil war 3 years before, now have some claims quoting international laws. Does that remind the Poles of something?

MTD, which was created almost literally on the streets, is strong. The organization is threatening with mass demonstrations. The ceramics factory, Zanon, the first one to be taken over by its workers and revived to the state of a profitable works, has become a symbol of the new and better, like Gdansk Shipyard used to be for Poles. MTD is considered by CIA and other similar organizations as a group which managed to create the most modern strategies and solutions how to unite and defend people from capitalism.

The returning rats from international financial circles are fighting back. Because Argentina constitutes a serious threat to the whole global economy, we should assume that if the USA wasn’t involved in Iraq now, the American soldiers would be defending their oil under the Argentinian grass in the name of democracy, or would be defending the freedom of their country there.

Kirchner, new President of Argentina, demands the extradition of the ex-president Carlos Menem, who is in Chile. Menem is wanted by the Argentinian authorities for corruption and bringing the country to ruin. He planned to enter for the presidential election in 2007 and used to promise the factory owners to return their property. Of course, that is why he enjoys the support from international financiers and can afford to laugh at the orders and decisions of Argentinian courts of law.

In January 2005 international bankers agreed to the proposal from the Argentinian government to be paid 25 cents for every dollar of the debt. An unseen thing happened – Argentina declared a war to IMF and several other globalist organizations and won. Argentina, protected by her own army, not only blackmailed the globalists, but also refused any negotiations with 700,000 holders of the state bonds. Argentina has an open way to be accepted back to the community of international societies from which she had been thrown away before. And she did it on her own conditions, as a full member, making decisions on her own.

Many bankers and international investors accuse Argentina of totalitarism and cheating investors and lenders. It caused quarrels among big financiers, Italian and American among others, who claim that if it was not for 9/11, they would be talking to Argentinians in a different manner.

Three months later IMF again began demanding a full payment of the debts. But Argentina was already strong enough being in economic co-operation with Brazil and China to show the bankers from Wall Street ‘the middle finger of her right hand’. Argentina started to prove to the world that about half of the creditors had already made a considerable profit on the Argentinian debts and that it was not fair that they should demand any more. This opinion was exposed by Chinese and Indian media. By the way, Argentina showed in black and white how some people tried to bring the country to bankruptcy and what it meant in practice.

The British ‘Guardian’ writes: ‘Three things worked for the benefit of Argentina. First, Kirchner’s card was strong thanks to the strong economy. Secondly, the truth about IMF was being revealed, that is why they wanted a quick settlement. Thirdly, Wall Street left Argentina just before the crisis and the negotiations were led by European banks. So the American Treasury was not pressed to play hard with Argentina. Also, they did not want Kirchner to make friends with a strong populist, President of Brazil, Lula.

Now many indebted countries may follow Argentina’s footsteps – and show the globalists their behind. Including Poland. And that is what the financial circles fear most. A precedence was created. A relatively non-significant country, held up against the wall, defied the wide-spread slogans of democracy, law and free market. And she won – at least so far. There has emerged a big chance for other countries. Now, when the American army is involved in Iraq, they can get rid of the yoke. You only need to want it and go for it. Just like the citizens of Argentina did, regardless of their social function, possessions and education.

Alex Lech Bajan
Polish American
CEO
RAQport Inc.
2004 North Monroe Street
Arlington Virginia 22207
Washington DC Area
USA
TEL: 703-528-0114
TEL2: 703-652-0993
FAX: 703-940-8300
EMAIL: alex@raqport.com
WEB SITE: http://raqport.com

We can use the words from John Wayne and John Paul II Pope in Obama Campaign and It was and is up todate now.

John Wayne ” Yes we can do it! Yes we can! We are Americans! ”

John Wayne ” I don’t do those things to other people and I require the same from them.”

John Paul II Peace to the world Pope message:

” Do not be afraid! You the people have to decide about your own future ”

Alex Lech Bajan
Polish American
RAQport Inc.
2004 North Monroe Street
Arlington Virginia 22207
Washington DC Area
USA
TEL: 703-528-0114
TEL2: 703-652-0993
FAX: 703-940-8300
sms: 703-485-6619
EMAIL: polonia@raqport.com

[ 13 Aug 2008 17:19 ]
Tbilisi – APA. Presidents of Poland, Lithuania, Estonia and Prime Minister of Latvia has held a press conference in Tbilisi today and expressed full support for Georgia, APA reports quoting Regnum.

Leaders of EU member states called on the western states to interfere in the situation for solving Georgian-Ossetian, Georgian-Abkhazian conflicts and forcing out Russian troops from the territories of unrecognized republics.
President of Lithuania Valdas Adamkus said that Georgian government should be allowed to protect its citizens, who had undergone violence in the territories under Russian occupation.
“It is clear that Georgia has no right to solve the conflicts in its territory. Sovereignty is only on paper and the international community is not active enough. If we want peace to be established here, occupation troops should leave Georgia,” he said.
Mentioning World War II, Adamkus noted that connivance caused death of millions of people.
Polish President Lech Kaczynski demanded to put Article on recognition of Georgia’s territorial integrity into cease-fire pledge.
“If the principle ensured long-term stability in Europe is violated, Europe will face chaos”, he said. Kaczynski added Georgia had obviously been undergone aggression and called European Union to be active.
“I call our biggest ally, responder for global security the US to ensure security of Georgia. Strict measures have been demanded on the situation occurred in Georgia”, he said.
Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves accused Russia of still believing “the era of the empire was coming back”.
“Security of small nations and countries should be ensured by NATO, EU and the US. If we win aggression against Georgia, we will see restoration of situation existed till 1991”, he said

translation : Maciek Zabierowski

And while we here are occupied with implementing democracy in Ukraine and Belarus, the Judeans are sneaking up from the back, trying to force our government to pay protection money, concealing that fact by calling it a compensation. But, let me start from the very beginning.

The demands for compensation emerged in mid-90’s when Poland announced she would join the NATO. The Jewish circles, mostly from the US, demanded a bribe from the Polish government for that. And the government did pay the bribe. It came as a legislation about the relations between the Polish state and Jewish communities, which ordered that the property of the former kehillot be returned to the few existing ones and the World Jewish Restitution Organization in New York. I call this a bribe since from the legal standpoint there should be no ’return’ of property, neither to the Jewish communities nor to the New York organization whatsoever. But what’s done is done.

The World Jewish Congress, which is the main company of the holocaust industry, felt encouraged by such easy money and demanded more than that. The word came from the then WJC Secretary General, Mr. Israel Singer. This time the case was the property left by the Jews killed by Germans. Mr. Singer, himself not being related to those Jews, had the cheek to threaten that Poland ’will be humbled in the international arena’ if she doesn’t satisfy the Congress’ demands and pay at least $60 billion.

As a result of such ’humbling’ we had Jews making scenes in the Auschwitz concentration camp, the exagerration about the incident in Jedwabne and now the preparations for the propaganda event in Kielce to commemorate the anniversary of the so-called ’pogrom’. While the ’humbling’ is going on, there is an effort to remove responsibility from the Germans. The US press, controlled by the holocaust industry, is careful enough never to write about ’the Germans’ but always ’the Nazis’, which even used the ’Nazi language’ while Poland is mistreated as eg. the country of „the Polish concentration camps’. Well, but it’s the Germans who paid at least 100 billion German Marks to Israel and are still paying eg. by supplying submarines. Still, you have to find someone guilty otherwise the world might think that those Jews died from natural causes.

In order to soften the Poles and extort at least $60 billion on one hand you have to damage our reputation by calling us a nation of killers and on the other make us defenseless against Jewish claims by taming us in the spirit of so called ’tolerance’ and ’dialogue’. The ’tolerance’ in fact means accepting the Jewish point of view while ’dialogue’ equals indulging every grim of the holocaust industry.

’Gazeta Wyborcza’ plays a crucial role in this process of taming, being a unique example of the Jewish fifth column in Poland. Last December the representatives of the Israeli authorities visited Poland and demanded Radio Maryja to be silenced as it was crossing up the holocaust industry. At the same time ’Gazeta Wyborcza’, in alliance with some ’useful idiots’ including particular representatives of clergy, fiercely attacked Radio Maryja. Only in December did I find 26 articles about the radiostation. All of them were in the tone of High Priest Caiaphas talking to Jesus. This newspaper campaign aimed at bringing pressure on the government to make concessions to the Israeli government representatives. Not to mention that the Israeli demand to silence Radio Maryja is an unprecedented intervention into Poland’s own internal affairs and violation against the freedom of speech and the freedom of press. Perhaps it’s worthwhile to have a closer look into ’Gazeta Wyborcza’ efforts to supress the free media in Poland.

Why did they launch this campaign against Radio Maryja last December ? Because on the 16th Dec. Mr. David Harris came to Poland and demanded money from the Polish government again. Mr. Harris is in charge of the American Jewish Committee. It is one of the minor companies in the Holocaust industry, which is the only good thing about it. While the World Jewish Congress goes as far as claiming $60 billion, Mr Harris’s Committee demands only $2,5 bln. It’s smaller and cheaper but indolent at the same time. President Kaczynski during his visit in the US asked him for support against the American media using the term ’Polish concentration camps’. Despite his own promises Mr. Harris has no influence on that and the largest US newspapers persist in using the term.

And so Mr. Harris came to Poland on 16th March, demanding the money again. Unfortunately, this time he was promised that the government would try to solve the problem ’by the end of this year’.

Why ’unfortunately’ ? Because from the legal standpoint neither Mr. Harris nor his Committee or the World Jewish Congress should receive any money. According to the Polish law of succession from Oct. 8, 1946, a property had to be claimed before Jan 1st 1949 otherwise it would be nationalized.

This means that the holocaust industry managers are trying to extort the dollars from the Polish state.

Why then, the Polish government made its promise ? One should say this clearly : any attempt to grease this fat chunk of meat with money extorted from Poland, which is a country struggling with economic difficulties, is in contradiction with the need to defend the interest of the nation.

We should remember the pledges to defend the interest of the state in international relations, given by President Kaczynski and PM Marcinkiewicz. May they defend it and have the courage even if Mr. Harris was to come to Poland again with our enemy, Mr. Israel Singer.

Praised be the Lord !

Stanislaw Michalkiewicz

Nasz Dziennik, 2007-09-16

A few questions politically incorrect…

1. Those who listen to Radio Maryja know that the radio station does not identify with any political party. People from various backgrounds, circles speak on the air, even those who belong to various political societies. Of course you will hear words of critique on the air; their target is not any particular political party and its structures but the morale of specific persons irrespective of their political attachments. This critique is delivered in the spirit of Gospel, that is not just a “sweet story about Jesus”, who pats everyone on the head and agrees with everyone, but as an evaluation of human attitudes that Jesus himself conducted, very often very harshly, e.g. when he called King Herod “a fox”, and the Pharisees – “grobami pobielanymi”. Additionally, it’s not Radio Maryja that identifies with a specific political party but it’s the liberal media that tries to identify Radio Maryja with some political groups! It is worth noting that various media identified Radio Maryja with different political parties at different times, always simply to discredit the radio station by attaching its name to a chosen political party. This is why mass media attempts to convince the public of the Catholic station’s supposed political outlook.

2. The “criticism” of Radio Maryja in the media usually comes down to labeling it as “xenophobic radio” or “voice of hatred”. The truth is that the radio station sometimes airs harsh criticism of actions of some groups operating in Poland and outside; the Torun based station never calls for any hatred towards anybody, especially any nations! Additionally, those that speak or are quoted on the air are people from different countries, speaking different languages, who love the truth and are its advocates in the name of true and pure brotherhood and cooperation between the nations. There was a time when a well-known actor publicly declared his surprise when he heard that Radio Maryja is spreading hatred towards other nations. He stated he never heard any such things at Radio Maryja. Nothing less, nothing more. This only leaves a question: when will someone finally present proof to support the allegation that Radio Maryja calls for hatred towards other nations? Or maybe someones will have to face the truth and apologize for distributing slander against the Torun-based radio station?

3. One of the most serious, and at the same time the strangest allegations against Radio Maryja is that it is breaking the unity of Church. Meanwhile Radio Maryja’s contribution to uniting worshippers in Poland and around the world is extremely valuable. Unity of Church is not a static value but a reality requiring constant development. Gospel and the word of God, propagating healthy teachings of the Church, participation in sacristy, prayer, caring for the underprivileged, and finally declaration of Christianity that is given not only by clergy but also by laics, are meant to build that unity. Is there any other Polish or international media that spreads Gospel, the Pope’s teachings, lectures and speeches of the bishops, katechezy given based on the Catholic Church Katechizm, commentaries and biblical meditation daily? How much more can you contribute to the strengthening of the unity of Church?

4. In all this current medial noise it is often difficult to see the fact that those media that often take great care to promote the unity of Church are those used to propagate atheism. They eagerly allow speaking the members of the clergy that, worried about the good of the worshippers, spread. These clergymen act with good intentions when they try to use any possible newspaper, magazine, radio or television station to propagate Catholicism, without paying any attention to the anti-religious profile of some of these media. It must be remembered that the means never justify the ends – the media as well! Those members of the clergy that appear in magazines, newspapers, radio and television stations that often spread anti-Christian texts cause the disturbances in the Church unity causing confusion amongst the believing mass media recipients. In this way they are authenticating those communicators that are fighting against the Church and the truth of the Gospel. Why is such little attention being paid to the dangers that result from the activities of antagonistic mass media, which misshape the image of the Church and try to divide the believers?

5. Radio Maryja is a public broadcaster; its operation is possible thanks to donations from the listeners that speak on the air. It is a stage that allows Catholics to partake in the evangelism, and with that – in unifying the Church. Thanks to the radio station they have a way to influence the public, political, cultural, and educational activities of Poles in Poland and around the world. Is there a better mean of public communication encouraging Catholics to – according to the teachings of the Church – take responsibility for the political and public life in the name of justice and Christian love?

6. To paraphrase a famous American preacher, Archbishop Fulton John Sheen we ca say that if you want to see what if holiest in the world take a look at what is most persecuted. Radio Maryja is persecuted not because someone spoke unfortunate words on the air, lied to the listeners, or disrespected someone (in laic mass media this is standard practice) but because it is through the radio station that the Gospel is spread around the world. If Radio Maryja and its founders were not a danger to the society of atheists that is trying by all means to make Poland and the world a society of atheists, we would not be persecuted. If the truths spoken on the air had no real value, were not real, good, truthful land faithful, they would not be attacked, falsified, and laughed at. If it wasn’t for Radio Maryja, the Polish Church would be virtually helpless and silent, following the example of the traditionally strong Irish Church, whose “evangelical power” and the influence on the daily life are weakening because – as stated by one the lecturers at a seminary academy at Maynooth – they do not have access to media or laic capable of protecting the Church in public. Whose interests lie in weakening or even annihilating Radio Maryja?

Fr Prof. Dr. hab. Ryszard Hajduk CSsR

Dziekuje i cieszy mnie ze jest nas wielu.
Dla ktorych sprawa Polski jest wazna.

z powazaniem,

Alex Lech Bajan
Polish American
CEO
RAQport Inc.

This Polish-language book has the title: HUSHED-UP CRIMES: JEWS AND POLES IN THE EASTERN BORDERLANDS IN THE YEARS 1939-1941. Much press attention has been devoted to Polish crimes against Jews, such as the massacre at Jedwabne and the so-called Kielce Pogrom. Why no mention of the other side of the coin? Jerzy Robert Nowak believes that it owes to political correctness, in which the sensibilities of Jews are respected owing to their losses in the Holocaust (pp. 65-66). But Nowak points out that there is no such respect for Polish sensibilities despite Poles having experienced their own Holocaust (3 million Poles murdered by the Germans alone), least of all (in Nowak’s opinion) from Jews.

Anyone who follows Jan Tomasz Gross (Jan T. Gross) in believing in the insignificance of Jewish-Communist collaboration is in for a rude awakening upon reading this book. According to cited Jewish scholars, Jews frequently constituted 75%-90% of the Soviet-serving administration in Soviet-conquered eastern Poland (p. 246, 223). In fact, no sooner had the Red Army invaded eastern Poland than her Jews began to engage in large-scale, aggressive anti-Polish actions. Jews helped disarm Polish soldiers, and humiliated them by tearing off their insignia (p. 239). Ironic to the scene in Steven Spielberg’s SCHINDLER’S LIST, a mob of Jews threw mud and stones at defenseless Polish prisoners (p. 89). Jews helped the Russians round up Poles on many occasions (p. 9, 61) and played an instrumental role in identifying Poles for imprisonment or deportation to horrible deaths in Siberia (p. 112). Jews helped destroy monuments of Polish heroes (p. 148), frequently desecrated Christian churches (p. 161-on), and even produced a mock atheistic parade in which a horse was dressed up in the vestments of a Catholic priest.

Nowak elaborates on the known murders of Poles by Jews in 17 named cities and towns in Soviet-occupied eastern Poland in 1939 alone (pp. 47-on). Jews were also involved in the murder of Poles (and Ukrainians) imprisoned by the Soviets while the latter were beating a hasty retreat ahead of the unexpected German invasion of June 1941 (p. 62-on).

The fact of extensive Jewish-Communist collaboration is attested to by not only anti-Semitic Poles, but also philo-Semitic ones such as Jan Karski (p. 237) and Stanislaw Kot (p. 240). And to show that this is no Polish imagination, Jerzy Robert Nowak discusses (p. 33-on, pp. 82-83, 105, 115, 142, 220, 225) numerous Jewish authors who don’t mince words about the large scale of Jewish-Soviet collaboration, including Harvey Sarner, Ben-Cion Pinchuk, Alexander Smolar, Hugon Steinhaus, Dov Levin, Abraham Sterzer, Arnold Zable, Charles Gelman, Alexander Wat, Henryk Reiss, Mark Verstandig, Yitzhak Arad, Pawel Szapiro, and Henryk Erlich. Smolar was especially candid about the murders of Poles by Jews (p. 48).

Recently (2006), Jan Thomas Gross (J. T. Gross) has written FEAR, in which he obsesses about Polish acquisitions of post-Jewish properties. But long before Poles did this, Jews were already expropriating Polish properties under Soviet rule (pp. 132-135). In fact, Jews sometimes knew which Poles were about to be deported to Siberia, and cajoled these Poles into selling them their properties for almost nothing.

Many rationalizations have been offered for the widespread Jewish-Communist collaboration (the Zydokomuna). Nowak examines these and finds them all wanting. (In a sense, it doesn’t matter. Regardless of exact motives, whenever Jews choose to become Poland’s enemies, they also make a deliberate choice to receive Polish enmity in return, and thereby forfeit the right to complain about such things as Polish anti-Semitism).

The most common rationalization is the one about Jews clinging to Soviets out of fear of extermination by the Nazis. In actuality, Hitler’s diatribes were not taken seriously by most Polish Jews in 1939 (p. 210), who saw the Germans as a cultured people (p. 212), and for whom Nazi anti-Semitism was either unimportant (p. 211) or transient. It is a little-known fact that Polish Jews sometimes welcomed the invading Nazis (p. 213-on), and even attempted to cross from the Soviet-occupied zone of Poland to the German-occupied one (p. 210, 212). Finally, the mass shootings and mass gassings of Jews by Germans were not to begin for nearly two more years!

The Jewish collaborators were not, as sometimes claimed, just radicalized youth and the very poor (p. 223). Furthermore, they also included many big-name Jews (p. 166-on).

Nowak also rebuts Krystyna Kersten (pp. 206-208), who would have us believe that Jews showed proportionate anti-Soviet as well as pro-Soviet behavior. In fact, records show that few Jews were arrested for anti-Soviet actions (pp. 224-225) and relatively few Jews were deported to Siberia (and then primarily for trying to cross into the German-occupied zone)(p. 225-226). (In any case, it makes no difference. Jews had turned against other Jews in various other contexts).

Against the view that Jews were merely retaliating against Poles for past anti-Semitism, Nowak points out that Jewish-Soviet collaboration against Poles also took place in several towns where, according to local Jewish opinion, prewar Jewish-Polish relations had been good (pp. 218-219). (One may also ask when the Jews ever retaliated against Russian anti-Semitism, which historically had been much more severe than its Polish counterpart. And, of course, the victims of Jewish-Communist collaboration included Polish children and other Poles who could not possibly have ever wronged any Jews. Those who complain about the collective scope of the Polish reprisal against the Jews of Jedwabne must remember the earlier collective anti-Polish scope of the Jewish-Soviet collaboration).

Nowak believes that Jewish-Soviet collaboration against Poles had been driven by the fact that many eastern Polish Jews were recent descendants of Russian Jews (the Litvaks) who felt no loyalty to Poland (pp. 230-231). Against the view that the Litvaks were never made to feel welcome, Nowak provides contrary examples, including Pilsudski’s favorable treatment of them. (In any case, in a non-pluralistic society such as Poland, one expects the minority to conform to the majority, not the other way around. When in Rome, do as the Romans do).

List do Redakcji

Halifax, Kanada , 21 lipiec 2008

Każdy kto zwiedza wschodnie prowincje Kanady a zwłaszcza Nowa Szkocje, winien odwiedzić w Halifaksie Muzeum Emigrantów mieszczące się w portowym budynku, przy molu zwanym Pier 21. Przez ten budynek w ciągu 50 lat od czasu pierwszej wojny światowej przewinęło się około miliona europejskich emigrantów do Kanady.

Zwiedzający maja możliwość obejrzeć film „dokumentarny” albo raczej artystyczna ilustracje tego co się kiedyś w tym budynku działo, w czasie kiedy emigranci lądowali w Halifaksie.

Jednym z takich symbolicznych emigrantów w pokazanym w tym filmie była mała, 10 letnia, chyba, polska Żydówka, która opowiadała pielęgniarce, że uciekła z Getta i ukrywała się w chrześcijańskiej rodzinie, która ciągle ja straszyła, że jak nie będzie grzeczna to ją oddadzą w ręce „władz”. Widz odnosi wrażenie, że te „władze” są władzami polskimi i to one są odpowiedzialne za tego dziecka tragedię i śmierć jej rodziców. Na zakończenie pielęgniarka uspokaja dziecko, że teraz nie musi się niczego bać i już nigdy jej nie wyślą z powrotem do Polski. Nigdzie w tym filmie nie jest wspomniane o Niemcach albo nawet Nazistach, którzy ostatnio są modnym zastępstwem dla niemieckich zbrodniarzy z okresu wojny. Film ten mocno nas zbulwersował i za namową mej amerykańskiej żony napisałem list protestacyjny do Muzeum Pier 21 jak i prasy kanadyjskiej i odnośnych ambasad, polskiej w Ottawie i kanadyjskiej w Warszawie. Moja reakcja była podyktowana faktem, ze rodzice dwojga moich bliskich przyjaciół z narażeniem własnego i swych dzieci życia, wykradli z Getta i ocalili, dwie miale Żydówki w podobnym wieku do dziewczynki pokazanej we wspomnianym obraźliwym filmie.

Szkalowanie Polski i Polaków ciągle jest w toku na amerykańskim kontynencie i można je znaleźć w najmniej spodziewanych miejscach i okolicznościach, nawet w wydawałoby się w przyjaznej Polakom Kanadzie.

Jeśli ktoś chciałby zasięgnąć więcej informacji z samego źródła, oto jest adres tego Muzeum: Pier 21 Society
1055 Marginal Road
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4P6
Canada

Telephone Switchboard: (902) 425-7770 Fax: (902) 423-4045
Email: info@pier21.ca Dr.inz. Jan Czekajewski

Columbus, Ohio, USA

Członek Polskiego Instytutu Naukowego (PIASA) w NY

janczek@aol.com

Pier 21 Society Staff

Che casino on net com stanze di gioco fruit slots omaha hold poker en ligne à télécharger gratuitement…

OBAMA 08 !!!

By Bob Considine
TODAYShow.com contributor

Polish émigré 5 years since entering U.S., he gets into 7 Ivy Leagues
Polish émigré couldn’t speak English; now he’s admitted to 17 top schools

By Bob Considine
TODAYShow.com contributor
updated 9:05 a.m. ET, Wed., June. 18, 2008
Lukasz Zbylut has taken “the old college try” to a whole new level.

The New York teenager, who emigrated from Poland only five years ago, applied to seven Ivy League schools — and was accepted by every one of them.

Now he’s thrilled to further his education at his “dream school” of choice — Harvard. What, Yale wasn’t good enough for him? How about Princeton?

——————————————————————————–

“I do feel sorry, and I feel awful for turning down such great institutions,” Zbylut told TODAY co-hosts Matt Lauer and Meredith Vieira. “But it’s Harvard.”

Among the other schools he declined were Columbia, Dartmouth, Penn, Cornell, Georgetown, Stanford and New York University.

There were 10 other prominent schools that also accepted the ever-smiling 18-year-old. But he knew he could only pick one.

“It’s a great feeling to have,” Zbylut added. “And it’s very exciting — and confusing, to an extent.”

A class act
Lukasz Zbylut (pronounced Loo-KASH Zbeh-LOOT) was in seventh grade when he came to the United States. At that point, he admits, he had only a limited grasp of the English language.

“It’s quite amazing that the first words you learn in any language are the curses,” Zbylut said with a laugh. “It’s ‘thank you’ and the curses. Someone should study that at some point. But I’ve come a long way since then.”

Zbylut said the transition to attending school in the U.S. was “easier than expected.”

“Schools in Poland are very rigorous, as you can imagine,” he said. “When taking my first exam, I was constantly turning to the girl next to me because in Poland, [testing] is very collaborative. Here, it’s the opposite.”

In addition to holding such high grades, Zbylut is co-captain of his school’s United Nations team; founder of its debate team; president of its mock-trial team and editor of the school newspaper. And, just for kicks, he plays soccer.

With such credentials, Lauer asked, why did Zbylut apply to so many schools when he knew he’d be accepted to so many of them?

“That isn’t really true, especially the last decade,” Zbylut explained. “[It’s] very competitive. We’re into the single digits when it comes to acceptance rates.

“I thought of myself as a great candidate, but I was never certain of getting into a single one college.”

Zbylut plans to study politics, law and philosophy at Harvard. But there was one school that actually did turn him down — the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Zbylut said he didn’t mind the snub.

“I really don’t regret it, because I would never be as passionate as a student they potentially could have given the spot to,” he said. “I’m hoping that the spot they gave would have been to someone who is very passionate about politics and everything.”

How can this quote equal even a single consideration of a Jewish vote?

Muslims are aware that a million people have died violently in Iraq because of the US war there, and this is one of the major causes of their anger. They see the US as agressive, imperialistic and a threat to them. They know that the US supports the most violent Israeli treatment of Palestinians and Lebanese and never takes an even-handed approach to the dispute, despite the fact that the rest of the world sees Israel’s illegal occupation as a major source of the conflict.

The US supports many brutal and corrupt regimes in the region, and this causes resentment as well, as does the fact that the US has in the past violently intervened in these countries’ internal affairs. For example in 1954 the US and Britain overthrew the democratically elected leader of Iran because he threatened the profits of Western oil companies, so they overthrew him and installed a brutal dictator instead. Iran has never recovered and this is something many Middle Easterners know all too well.

If you want to reduce the threat from militant Islam, you should support American leaders who seek to diffuse some of this hatred by improving relations. This is the only way America and Israel can have long term security.

This is the transcript from the former national security advisor’s keynote speech.

-MK

Here is Pastor Wright’s ‘Black Value System’
posted at his website. This is what Barak Obama
pledged an oath to for the past 20 years:
http://www.tucc.org/black_value_system.html

Pastor Wright gave Louis Farakan a life time
achievement award. Here is what Louis Farakan believes:
Posted at his own website.
http://www.noi.org/muslim_program.htm

AMERICANS JUDGE FOR YOURSELVES …